26900+ entries in 0.087s
BingoBoingo:
mircea_popescu: The old civil defense detectors tend behave pretty erratically
phf:
mircea_popescu: laziness coefficient L
phf:
mircea_popescu: i didn't understand that last question
phf:
mircea_popescu: i clarified it a bit with "non-trivial to transfer"
phf:
mircea_popescu: non transferable perhaps
phf: danielpbarron expressed some concern that the following part of yesterdays #b-a log was an accusation made by me against
mircea_popescu. i don't see it, but perhaps i'm missing something?
http://paste.lisp.org/display/311820/raw BingoBoingo:
mircea_popescu: Nah, they got another party to unterrorize the ipnoHe
ben_vulpes: and as
mircea_popescu has pointed out, courts' mandate descends from the king but may not bind him
ben_vulpes: i am fully torn between the poles of wanting to understand why
mircea_popescu burned the coins to make the point, desperately wanting continuity with the logs-as-they-were, and recognizing the futility-cum-insubordination of a footsoldier asking anything
BingoBoingo:
mircea_popescu: I may need one of those weathervanes
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> urgh, i scroll between two chans, and one is full of american election and the other - ThickAsThieves << I think something about the details of the process contains electrolytes
mircea_popescu needs to mix up his hatorade
BingoBoingo: <
mircea_popescu> but why ? an' wherefore ? << It's how conventions worked routinely before 1970. They got the delegates and then made the rules. Now they just change the rules afterwards.
BingoBoingo: <
mircea_popescu> well yeah, and what's the free booze, bud and everclear ? << Everyclear is expensive even when adjusted for alcohol content. The cheapest stuff goes by names like Crystal Palace, COuntry Club, and Gem Clear
trinque:
mircea_popescu: it's using a password with that nick, strange that it's not auth'd
assbot: Logged on 14-01-2016 15:11:05;
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell mike_c here's a thought, in
http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/ might be a good idea to hide users not seen in i dunno, a quarter ? a year ? something ? explained, and with link for "full list".
assbot: Logged on 24-03-2016 15:12:01;
mircea_popescu: anyway, i'm not going to read the latest installments in fiatista turdology, much like hte prev ones. nor do i need to, they're perpetually the same crud. in any case : loyalty is not a bad thing. loyalty to bad people is a bad thing, but loyalty in general is the only saving grace of manhood. the one probem socialism generally encounters is loyalty, which is why the whole song and dance.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 23:43:30;
mircea_popescu: and to be perfectly clear - it ~was~ my stupid fucking idea of seeding the lordship off the stats page on roughly the basis of activity that got us in this mess.
davout:
mircea_popescu: domain received!
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 23:35:36;
mircea_popescu: i dunno, but the fact remains this nonsense can't continue, if for no reason then because i won't be any part of the most recent attempt of fiat world to reclaim the republic. so for the sake of variety, let's go with : kakobrekla, you willing to take nubbins off the l1 ?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 23:35:31;
mircea_popescu: 2 requires the man who just saw the product of his not-inconsequential efforts die over "not doing what mp says, with money" have to choose whether to do what mp says... but with people, this time. we did in fact start this channel together, just like bitbet, and he did do a lot of infrastructure work here, just as there. so... what do ?
nubbins`: <+
mircea_popescu>let me point out to you that bitbet came down over my realisation that this is how you lot think. stop fucking thinking like this before i have to cut more heads. <<< or, put another way, "stfu talking dangerous talk, alf, or s.nsa is next"
nubbins`: <+asciilifeform>apparently all of us but
mircea_popescu are idiots ? << you just now realizing?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 19:51:30; hanbot: <jurov> and it did not use that to settle later claims << so when actual operator error occurred,
mircea_popescu ate it, and your reaction is basically "hey, if he can pay for that, he should pay for this unrelated problem too! let's him pay for everything!", and this amidst weeks of bitching about "bad faith"?
hanbot: <jurov> and it did not use that to settle later claims << so when actual operator error occurred,
mircea_popescu ate it, and your reaction is basically "hey, if he can pay for that, he should pay for this unrelated problem too! let's him pay for everything!", and this amidst weeks of bitching about "bad faith"?
☟︎ trinque: now if kakobrekla and
mircea_popescu disagree on this point... here we are!