log☇︎
202100+ entries in 0.116s
mircea_popescu: you mean, on the public record ? so next time starry-eyed Framedragger walks in and is all "oh, princeton, respectable institution" i link him above3 and he has to somehow deal with the cognitive dissonance ?
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: what original thing did they take from phuctor, may i ask? ☟︎
asciilifeform suspects that it'll end the same way as all of the other cases
mircea_popescu: since when the fuck does stern look @ slavegirl include litany of misdeeds ? let HER know what she did wrong and let HER fix it.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i'll include the why in a formal proceeding. let them FIRST clean up their act
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: i'd include the 'why'
Framedragger: did you send this already mircea_popescu lol
Framedragger: asciilifeform: the one with whatshisname, the german?
asciilifeform: i in fact did 'write to their ml', review what came of it.
Framedragger: if they ignore then - i'll donate to bitcoin foundation a bit for generating noise.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: do you recall the seclist thread ?
Framedragger: well, why don't i (unless someone else already planned to do it first?) write to those folks on that ML, informing of phuctor, to see their response? maybe futile at this point and useless, but at least a more constructive reaction.
asciilifeform: years of this nonsense.
asciilifeform: and various media folx ( the risky.biz people, i wrote to several times also , for instance. 0 reply. )
deedbot: http://phuctor.nosuchlabs.com/gpgkey/7232807AAC462CD20992D2246A28C5DA1B22375772CB8C9C4D8AD53B8EC873AC << Recent Phuctorings. - Phuctored: 1434...1633 divides RSA Moduli belonging to '194.135.30.143 (ssh-rsa key from 194.135.30.143 (13-14 June 2016 extraction) for Phuctor import. Ask asciilifeform or framedragger on Freenode, or email fd at mkj dot lt) <ssh...lt>; ' (Unknown RU)
deedbot: http://phuctor.nosuchlabs.com/gpgkey/7232807AAC462CD20992D2246A28C5DA1B22375772CB8C9C4D8AD53B8EC873AC << Recent Phuctorings. - Phuctored: 1673...4139 divides RSA Moduli belonging to '194.135.30.143 (ssh-rsa key from 194.135.30.143 (13-14 June 2016 extraction) for Phuctor import. Ask asciilifeform or framedragger on Freenode, or email fd at mkj dot lt) <ssh...lt>; ' (Unknown RU)
Framedragger: the fact that djb knows and ignores does indeed speak ill of him, i agree.
Framedragger: granted, phuctor gets crawled *more* / *a lot* (i presume, from what you had been telling). so i understand the incredulity of "you haven't heard?!!"
asciilifeform: and to others.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: i wrote to, e.g., bernstein, more than once.
Framedragger: well, my relay descriptor search service also got crawled loads, but the fact that people didn't know about it wasn't because people ignored it; but just that meat-people (not bots) weren't aware of it.
Framedragger: top hit for every pgp keyid? that's pretty neat.
asciilifeform: so nope, nice try.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: tall order, it gets crawled every 3 sec. and is ~top hit for, e.g., ~every pgp keyid on the planet.
Framedragger: and you absolutely cannot fathom the humble thought that they simply didn't hear about phuctor?
asciilifeform: the 'nothing to see here, move along, it was all this one d00d with broken key gen' aspect is also lulzy.
Framedragger: asciilifeform: ok i've read it; so your chief issue is that they didn't mention phuctor in-between the initial 2012 study and the 2016 years correct? i mean, bear with me, i'm not baiting.
Framedragger: ah! ty.
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2017/minigame-smg-march-2017-statement/ << Trilema - MiniGame (S.MG), March 2017 Statement
asciilifeform: studiously ignoring the years in between. because they contain -- solely -- phuctor.
Framedragger: asciilifeform: wait you must mean some other page than https://nymity.ch/anomalous-tor-keys/ because para 3 on there starts with "What does our work mean for Tor users?"
asciilifeform: goes straight from heninger, who, while a hot chick, never published the actual data !
mircea_popescu: Framedragger the "originate the idea" hogwash is ridiculouys. next you'\re going to bring defenses in copyright cases based on "grimm brothers didn't invent the alphabet so therefore ineptitude is a ok!!1"
Framedragger: okay i think i know how trinque feels when being side-dragged into non sequiturs.
Framedragger: what particular paragraph ticked you off on https://nymity.ch/anomalous-tor-keys/ asciilifeform?
Framedragger: so, phuctor didn't originate the idea, is all.
Framedragger: possible weaknesses of rsa keys and the idea to run a "your relay key is weak" service as part of tor metrics infrastructure (tor metrics itself is an old project, ca. 2011)
mircea_popescu: in other lulz : try and find WHERE you register a complaint with teh fucking shitshow that pretends to be a university.
Framedragger: how about "was discussed in developer meetings *long ago*" (the counter will be "you didn't tell us then so FU", so w/e i guess.)
mircea_popescu: Framedragger you can not klnow such a thing.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: didja read the quoted bit ?
mircea_popescu: ima file a complaint with the princeton plagiarism police.
Framedragger knows phf and asn from that list personally and knows for certain that they didn't 'plagiarize' from phuctor. but whatever, if phuctor not cited, it's plagiarism because independent thought not possible, etc.
mircea_popescu: (somebody plox send to asn@torproject.org claudiar@princeton.edu laurar@csa.princeton.edu an' pwinter@cs.princeton.edu a notice saying "you forgot to quote phuctor, you dorks".)
asciilifeform sings tom lehrer's 'Plagiarize!'
asciilifeform: ( goes straight from heninger etc 'Most recently, in 2016, Hastings et al. [3] revisited the problem of weak keys and investigated how many such keys were still on the Internet four years after the initial studies. ' )
mircea_popescu: there's by now a list of about 3-4 of these, all of them similarily sufficient on own strength.
mircea_popescu: and in ib, i expect the correct indexing will still be block height . tx index.
mircea_popescu: this item clearly gets rolled up into the "either move to ib or die with prb" eventual fork.
asciilifeform: i can only describe the known cuts here. it's this, or live with no-sane-index and geometric-grinds-to-a-halt.
mircea_popescu: as it expects somehow "what's right" to matter naturally.
mircea_popescu: right or wrong make absolutely no difference, even though it's how the female brain gets caught in this
mircea_popescu: understand something about "declarations" in this vein : they themselves are an attack, if you can't universally enforce them. the us collapsed out of an attempt to declare that "they, not us, are the bad guys" without the actual strength to enforce this ; so did the soviet union, and so does every inept mother who tries to tell her kid what to do out of line. ☟︎
asciilifeform: even though shitoshi, through having been dropped as a child, theoretically permitted it.
asciilifeform: i propose a declaration of 'tx replacement is an attack against sane bitcoin and whoever does it, is the forker, and not us, who thereafter ban it in trb and subsequent proggies.'
asciilifeform: shitoshi's tx format still uses only txid.
mircea_popescu: yes. what do you want me to do, shit antimatter ingots ?
asciilifeform: see the difference though ?
asciilifeform: tx replacement , and the mere contemplation of 'pruning', are a carefully crafted enemy rot weapon.
asciilifeform: thing is, there is NO sane (i.e. o(1)) way to index without demanding unique global txid. ☟︎
asciilifeform: ( per http://btc.yt/lxr/satoshi/source/src/main.cpp?v=wires_rev1#0968 , and last thread re same )
asciilifeform: it worx internally (in e.g., nqb) but the mere fact of tx replacement idiocy being supported in shitoshi's turd, means that a tx is not, in principle, self-contained, can mean entirely different movement if meanwhile its txid got recycled
mircea_popescu: there is that. but his proposed de facto multiindex (block height txn height txid) works.
asciilifeform still brainmelting over the 'txid is not unique' horrors
mircea_popescu: memory is a fuzzy thing.
mircea_popescu: yeah, on contemplation it's not actually used for anything "standard" so to speak, is it.
asciilifeform: this is not equivalent to 'you need a block hash to form a tx'. in point of fact you do not .
mircea_popescu: well... it's in there.
asciilifeform: but how does this 'need genesis block' ? yes it's a miner puzzle that uses genesis block as key. it could have just as easily used bible as key.
mircea_popescu: now then : 09f691b2263260e71f363d1db51ff3100d285956a40cc0e4f8c8c2c4a80559b1 spends a4bfa8ab6435ae5f25dae9d89e4eb67dfa94283ca751f393c1ddc5a837bbc31b ; for this purpose it actually uses the genesis block hash.
a111: Logged on 2017-04-05 13:18 asciilifeform: is what i see in there
a111: Logged on 2017-04-05 13:16 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i misstated. it spends bitcoin (from a4bfa8ab6435ae5f25dae9d89e4eb67dfa94283ca751f393c1ddc5a837bbc31b ) for which purpose it needs the genesis block hash
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-05#1637573 relates to http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-05#1637562 and is in response to http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-05#1637570 ☝︎☝︎☝︎
asciilifeform: iirc that was from the tardstalk thread last month
asciilifeform: the scripttron offers no such knob as 'gimme a block hash', not in satoshi's thing
mircea_popescu: god i'm going to have to delve into the whole pile of ancient history
asciilifeform: is what i see in there ☟︎
a111: Logged on 2017-02-25 20:19 mircea_popescu: idiot example #1 : peter todd & prb idiots came up with "a way to do things", which does not in fact work.
mircea_popescu: some puzzle bs. you might remember we discussed that whole nonsense recently.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: how does it need the genesisblockhash?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: i remember the 'stoned' lul
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i misstated. it spends bitcoin (from a4bfa8ab6435ae5f25dae9d89e4eb67dfa94283ca751f393c1ddc5a837bbc31b ) for which purpose it needs the genesis block hash ☟︎
mircea_popescu: in other random lulz / things nobody notices, http://btcbase.org/log/2014-02-21#521918 <<->> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/18/bitcoin_user_stoned_on_virus_warnings/ ☝︎
a111: Logged on 2017-04-05 13:08 mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes take for instance 09f691b2263260e71f363d1db51ff3100d285956a40cc0e4f8c8c2c4a80559b1 : it spends bitcoin produced in the genesis block, and it thereby uses the hash of that block.
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-05#1637556 << it does no such thing: genesis block is unspendable ( originally from a bug in shitoshi's tx db, but since cemented ) ☝︎
mircea_popescu: (ie, if you don't also save the block hash, you can't do some edge cases of (currently mostly unsupported, but historically used) txn.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes take for instance 09f691b2263260e71f363d1db51ff3100d285956a40cc0e4f8c8c2c4a80559b1 : it spends bitcoin produced in the genesis block, and it thereby uses the hash of that block. ☟︎
a111: Logged on 2017-04-05 05:09 a111: Logged on 2017-04-04 00:23 ben_vulpes: http://btc.yt/lxr/satoshi/source/src/main.h?v=wires_rev1#0261 << kinda looks like all one needs to bake CTxIn's is the hash of the transaction and output index, can someone spot check this for me?
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-05#1637547 << you certainly need the pubkey of the input address, which was back in the day the rationale behind the whole "don't reuse addresses" thing -- the pubkey of an address which has paid before is known ; the pubkey of an address which has not paid before isn't known. ☝︎☟︎
mircea_popescu: shinohai i have nfi what that is but anyway.
shinohai: Q: who here in this circle-jerk sycophant orgy supports the delusion of ideal money, given that Buttcoin is an anti-fragile standard top-down controlled by whales? Ideal for whom? No need to wait for the lulz."
shinohai: "Free feel to pass on my question, so he can prepare.
shinohai: Lel, I finally got around to checking that tardstalk thread mircea_popescu, re: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1837136.msg18367669#msg18367669
ben_vulpes: but ben_vulpes steals time from mary to pay peter or how did it go, must away again
a111: Logged on 2017-04-04 00:23 ben_vulpes: http://btc.yt/lxr/satoshi/source/src/main.h?v=wires_rev1#0261 << kinda looks like all one needs to bake CTxIn's is the hash of the transaction and output index, can someone spot check this for me? ☟︎
ben_vulpes: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-04#1636874 << directly relevant. afaict, producing a transaction with trb code boils down to making a 'ctransaction' with 'vin's shaped per the constructor http://btc.yt/lxr/satoshi/source/src/main.h?v=wires_rev1#0261 ☝︎
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: point me to a 'somewhere', if you'd be so kind
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes pretty sure you also need the block hash somewhere
ben_vulpes: eg produce some data a user can use on an entirely separate box to make and sign txns for rebroadcast however
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: this for wallets?