15700+ entries in 0.02s
mod6: i'll check back in later all! <3
mod6: in scheme news, i learned how to read a file and print it out the screen. lol
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> breaks do a body good. << yeah for sure. and i think it totally helps to step back and see the entire forest through the trees.
mod6: it's been weird to even be afk for 24 hours.
mod6: mircea_popescu: how's everything been around here
mod6: shinohai: cool! maybe take a backup at somepoint before you get to 100% so incase of power-cycle you won't have to start over from genesis.
mod6: really quite helpful to just relax for a couple of days.
mod6: thanks to whomever updated the wiki
mod6: i'll dig it up, but none the less, everyone should be using v99995 now
mod6: i dunno where that other version came from.
☟︎ mod6: asciilifeform: re yesterday (line 47) of some version of the V99997 build script.... I took a look at the one that was deedbot'd and that line was correct.
mod6: ben_vulpes: re shiva, cool that you're getting into that!
mod6: in this case, 'read-char'
mod6: and since i have no clue "what lispers typically do", I'll ask: I usually read files one line at a time and then do things accordingly, is this a typical lisp convention? Or do most just read one word at a time and then do stuff?
mod6: so, with tinyscheme, there is no 'read-line' -- which we sort of talked about; having to write a bunch of our own procedures.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> every time blockchain counts a new million blocks. << sounds good!
mod6: jurov: test worked with just a regular clearsigned message.
mod6: mircea_popescu: thanks Sir. :]
mod6: That way we don't wait, but we don't slam the door yet either.
mod6: Perhaps this: Implement with Cramer-Shoup, and if the implementation is finalized before any worthy submissions come to us, then end the contest and pay the btc to alf?
mod6: no, not even. posted feb 4th.
mod6: I'm kinda torn, I want us to move forward with 'g', so Cramer-Shoup fits the bill for sure. On the other hand, I'd like to think that over a long interval we might see some interesting submissions eventually.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> well lessee here, one of mod6 ben_vulpes give an opinion on this ? << In relation to the contest? I'm good with Cramer-Shoup.
mod6: is there such a thing as adhd in china? if a kid just wont do stuff or doesn't pay attention they just hit you with a stick no?
mod6: maybe he whitelists 'em?
mod6: thought that was her twitter feed haha
mod6: is that going to drop every tweet into a deed?
mod6: shit that was seventeen years ago.
mod6: friend of mine only ever talked about "cons-boxes" for about 2 months.
mod6: I think they used to teach this SICP directly as the first programming class at UofM - used it as a weed-out course.
mod6: Snarf: ``To grab, especially a large document or file for the purpose of using it either with or without the owner's permission.'' Snarf down: ``To snarf, sometimes with the connotation of absorbing, processing, or understanding.'' (These definitions were snarfed from Steele et al. 1983. See also Raymond 1993.)
mod6: She asked me if "snarffed" was a technical term, now I can point at this:
mod6: im actually glad for that. and personally, I don't even want to look at any other lisp really because other lisps seem to have a bunch more built-in functions that we'll basically not use.
mod6: or do we need to write a proc for that too?
mod6: alright. i was thinking with using scheme (like I was saying lastnight), we'll have to build some pretty extensive libs of procs of our own. which is probably better anyway... but, it'd be cool if this thing would tell you what you've already defined.
mod6: lol, no idea how that correlates yet, but that is indeed the actual stored defintion no?
mod6: so in "foo.scm" i have defined a "square" procedure, but in (oblist), among everything else, its listed as: (square char-ci>=? cddddr expt)
mod6: phf, asciilifeform: so you know whats weird?
mod6: i didn't know that's what you called those works of art.
mod6: i learn so many good words here.
mod6: i'll have to go back and re-read some of our previous threads on the topics.
mod6: food for thought perhaps.
mod6: ok, so that's a possible whole replacement piece, sure. was just thinking is it worth possibly making a temporary tool for this until bitcoinfs? or just wait and do bitcoinfs.
mod6: mircea_popescu: awesome. yeah, i agree we should do something there. that's super annoying that it happened to these guys.
mod6: qq: Can something be developed to help these guys with the corrupted databases when they get a hard-reboot?perhaps something similar to cutblock that will say lopp off the last blk####.dat file or something? is this worth looking into?
mod6: i'll test that out tomorrow when i get a sec.
mod6: thanks asciilifeform
mod6: is there a way to see what procedures are currently loaded into the construct?
mod6: phf: and I meant "is #<EOF> normal?"
mod6: oh unexpected reboot 'eh
mod6: i'll try that. (im just playing with tinyscheme on its own, outside of shiva/bitcoin) -- figure its a good idea to use THIS interpreter as opposed to some other one/lisp.
☟︎ mod6: asciilifeform & ben_vulpes: yup that worked.
mod6: ben_vulpes: anyway to do this without emacs?
mod6: !up thestringpuller
mod6: just put code in "foo.scheme" and then somehow load it with tinyscheme ?
mod6: so if i wanna a bunch of scheme code in a file and then load that file into the interpreter so I have my procedures defined without having to type them all in... how do I do that?
mod6: i'll check out the ps tho
mod6: some good examples of stuff in there.
mod6: yeah, i've figured that from what i've seen thus far in sicp. which is alright.