log☇︎
12 entries in 0.621s
BingoBoingo: In other news: Miners signaled for SegWit 'Lock In" UASF averted, network turbulence expected
BingoBoingo: Well, this is a most idiotic of forks, use luke-jr UASF client, and you fork onto luke-jrXT chain at X date with no miners required
a111: Logged on 2017-06-23 04:59 pete_dushenski: turns out it's quite the mish-mash out there. far from the taught controversy of reddit : "uasf" vs "core" vs "blockstream" . pretty much none of the software versions you read about anywhere outside #t are actually the ones in use.
pete_dushenski: turns out it's quite the mish-mash out there. far from the taught controversy of reddit : "uasf" vs "core" vs "blockstream" . pretty much none of the software versions you read about anywhere outside #t are actually the ones in use. ☟︎
pikachu: yes im developing an ulcer thanks to jihan/uasf
pikachu: uasf camp say, you must support uasf, or jihan wu fork will win
pikachu: anyone else not worried because of uasf?
a111: 3 results for "\"UASF\"", http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=%22UASF%22
mircea_popescu: !#s "UASF"
IRC-Source_82051: what do you guys think about BIP148/UASF?
shinohai: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-March/013719.html "If 60% of blocks in any retargeting period signal for Double UASF,
shinohai: https://github.com/UASF/bitcoin/releases <<< the latest it appears from the segwit camp