log☇︎
99600+ entries in 0.063s
ben_vulpes: no this is incorrect. i am fighting a fire elsewhere right now, will be back as soon as i can.
mod6: I may have screwed this up: http://cascadianhacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/rockchip.lisp
mircea_popescu: i have nfi how this works, but pizarro seems to be getting ever less for ever more money.
mod6: Just trying to see if we have enough money to get 48 RC's built and delivered down there.
mod6: I think.
mod6: 24032 (from ben's lisp thing) / 8500 = 2.82 BTC at todays prices for 24 Rockchips delivered is what we had figured out.
asciilifeform: mod6: in theory: in 2u
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, well, actually, the whales eat the way successful business sells : like we breathe.
asciilifeform: ( recall, btw, the crackpot who wanted to disperse food into the air and breathe it , lol )
mircea_popescu: nevertheless, the problem of selling starts with the cheaper bits.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: right, the whale eats the way we breathe
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, that's true.
mircea_popescu: results in just enough protein intake to maintain its mass.
asciilifeform: ( the other front line , is that we gotta get moar saleables, in particular rockchip system, asap )
mircea_popescu: takes up 50 tons of water per mouthful, one mouthful per minute, each minute, all day fucking long, each day of the loving year.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: sorta why i doubt that the whale is the correct model. not all protein , from our pov, is created equally, a webtard with a few satoshi to his name, does us no good
mircea_popescu: whale's just looking for protein. how the protein subjectively sees itself as packaged, "krill", "rabbit"... frankly none of the whale's problem.
mod6: Well, I can agree, we need to get the word out.
asciilifeform: whale is looking for plankton; if he were filter feeding for, e.g. , rabbits, in the sea -- might have problem
mircea_popescu: whale takes up what, 50 tons of water PER MOUTHFUL ?
asciilifeform: fact of the matter is, for the price of pizarro rockchip, heathen can get 5x the cpu with 10x the bandwidth in heathendom. how to persuade him to instead buy this ?
mircea_popescu: i don't know of any method besides filter feeding. and do you know what's the primary ingredient for filter feeding ?
asciilifeform: and the lack of discussion , is quite worrisome
asciilifeform: this is why asciilifeform has serious headache , re the heathen component -- currently i've nfi how to appeal to them in any way at all
mircea_popescu: dorks don't even bother to crop the copyright notices off their "profile" pics.
asciilifeform: for a sec i was thinking 'hmm wat'
a111: Logged on 2018-05-12 07:57 mircea_popescu: reminds me of this chick on fetlife, "So you don't want to have a smart discuss, you're here for what ? What do you research here ? Because I'm agree with your description."
asciilifeform: what's the smart discussion there? i'm not seeing it
mircea_popescu: they're even more retarded than tardstalk, if that were even possible.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, ok, but take https://forums.digitalpoint.com/threads/how-to-get-more-traffic.2694475/ : oodlebunches of linda patels having a smart discuss!
mircea_popescu: consider for instance how the whole http://www.dianacoman.com/2018/04/17/rfc-euloras-communication-protocol-eucomms/#comment-1169 pile worked. we know things from there we don't know from what you're describing.
asciilifeform: ( heathens virtually always insist on 'private' comm, and have to be beaten with a stick to even contemplate sane conversation )
asciilifeform: entirely correct, i was not even able to persuade'em to join #p
mircea_popescu: but you didn't do this in a useful way ; because there's, for instance, no way for your friends (such as, say, you from the future) to reference it! or for the op to see anything.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-04 01:50 asciilifeform: here's a sample of convos b/w asciilifeform and heathens ( whom he knows irl, over yrs ) : 'why didja put it in UY, bw costs 4x moar than in usa and cia will still steal yer iron eventually' ; 'i have to do what!? to get server in the rack?!' etc
asciilifeform: asciilifeform reached out to several intelligent heathen folk of old acquaintance ; and got same response from each , i.e. http://btcbase.org/log/2018-05-04#1808491 ☝︎
mircea_popescu: and this;d be a major problem ~even if~ l1 added up to 50%+1 of the entire world.
mircea_popescu: the problem as far as i discern it is, "not only there's no conversation going, but the mutism threatens to entrench itself as a 'way to be', and it's not sustainable". when's the last time pizarro talked to anyone ? gotta talk to people, somehow, somewhere. silence is a first approximation of death.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> does this make sense to you ? << Yes, Sir. Got it.
asciilifeform: heathens on the board, for instance, imho would thoroughly trash the 'l1 isp' premise.
asciilifeform: asciilifeform's particular concern , is , in short form : right now we have the ~physical~ component of the item we wanted for yrs , a l1-operated locking-cage isp. but not ~economic~ component, because l1 does not presently add up to sufficient custom to power the thing 100% . so it needs heathen power. but this must be achieved without compromising on the 'l1 isp' .
mircea_popescu: pretty much the ~whole~ of economic activity is the process of a) building b) truthful propositions that c) describe some sort of comparative advantage and d) lots of it, especially e) of a very easily defended kind.
mircea_popescu: does this make sense to you ?
mircea_popescu: mod6, you understand, refinancing is people putting money on a proposition. it depends immensely what the proposition is. P1 = "our book value is ~11 and consists 95% of exotic hardware nobody else can get where it is" is very different from P2 = "we ate through our seed A+++ would do some more dicking about with files we download. oh and there's also some hardware."
mircea_popescu: aite, let's get back to this. ☟︎
asciilifeform wishes there were a spare asciilifeform , because asciilifeform is 150% loaded with chores
mircea_popescu: did you ever manage to get a btc->fiatola conversion going ? or what, still mired in paperwork is it ?
asciilifeform: eventually will begin to run out, if no one else shares the chore of producing it
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, oh, are you running out of cash, too ?
mircea_popescu: i said it once, you know. aanyway : the original idea (get >=300 rockchips there, in a dozen+ Us) was trashed by practical considerations (as alf pointed out, he can't carry 12 us in one go) ; but it'd have required refinancing because you simply did not have enough money to pay for it.
asciilifeform: esp given as the fact that the project has cost asciilifeform a good % of his btc and the bulk of his usd
mod6: I suspected this as well.
asciilifeform: also worth to keep in mind, that, e.g., asciilifeform is willing to jump through certain flaming rings for 50% stake, that he would not so eagerly jump through for 1%
mod6: Alright, so what do you suggest here? I thought that you were saying, multiple times that we should refinance. This is what I've been thinking about most lately.
mircea_popescu: but you will have hell on wheel in your hands trying to get more money as a palliative solution to "i don't feel like building sales today". ☟︎
mircea_popescu: and of course you can also just issue bonds ; whether convertible or not, until conversion event they sit on the passive.
mircea_popescu: equity entitles you to a say, but the necessities of physical world (whereby there's only so many seats for the thing to work ; and whereby those have to be seated on by physical people) make the relationship between board and equity somewhat electoral.
mircea_popescu: there's an indirection layer there, between owning equity and board seats.
mircea_popescu: mod6, well, if it's a sale, like how you got it, then yes. if it's just refinancing, then you keep whatever %.
mod6: Yeah, I think 4 is plenty.
mircea_popescu: it's not really practical to have no boards, generally ; but also not larger than maybe a half dozen+1. even that's large.
mod6: What happens to old bond holders?
mod6: This is good to know.
mircea_popescu: mod6, generally, if you refinance the old board gets trashed.
asciilifeform: mod6: there is more than 1 difficulty with this scheme, but the most obvious one i know of, is that i dun think i actually know 5 people who ~have~ 10btc (much less wanting to play)
mod6: I believe this is probably a good way to get Pizarro into better financial shape, but it's hard for me to imagine how this works.
mod6: not each, 5 total.
mod6: Let's say, for instance, 5 different people each came in with 10 BTC. Would that create 5 new board seats each?
mod6: So, let's say that we thought that we would need to raise 50 BTC (just throwing it out there) - I'd like to talk about how that might work.
mod6: Again, not the top priority either. Anyway, moving on...
mod6: This makes 100% sense to me.
mod6: Customers, who's paid, who hasen't, what do we own, when are teh bills due.
mod6: I'm not impartial to database. I just want something that we can all see, and all the info about the business is contained within.
mod6: I dont even think that he really wants to use it specifically either, as, again, mod6 is not accountant.
mod6: asciilifeform: it wasn't months. I spent probably 1 weekend hacking on a psql ddl back in march, and ben_vulpes is finally getting around to looking at it now.
mircea_popescu: hey, you get a free db with the file system, i never was arsed to do any better on my reports. not that i'm proposing my laziness as the model for anyone else nor that i think the bikeshedding discussion needs to continue, now extented into a theoretical comparison of the merits and dismerits of postgress and implicit-fs-db.
mod6: I didn't say this was top priority either.
asciilifeform: and it has all of the pertinent functionality of a microshit spreadshit etc
asciilifeform: i made the above ^ in <1hr
asciilifeform: but it does not need to take months to make, wtf
asciilifeform: it wouldn't even bother me if it were a js hack, along the lines of my http://btcbase.org/log/2018-05-05#1809743 example ☝︎
mod6: I don't think anyone is arguing otherwise.
mircea_popescu: yes ; but if the present trend continues you won't have all that much to read altogether.
mod6: Perhaps, whatever it is, it must yield something that mod6 can read.
mod6: And I can agree, that it doesn't have to happen right now.
mod6: It is not a waste of time.
mod6: All I'm saying is, a business should have a formal way to track things, this is all.
mod6: How is this without merit?
mod6: How the fuck are we to know what is what.
mod6: God forbid that ben_vulpes get's hit by a car on his bike tomorrow and then we have to pick this up.
mod6: Just /SOMETHING/ that doesn't require debugging.
mod6: I want all of the things in a place we can all refer to and say "oh there it is! now I can see how many x are in there" or whatever.
mircea_popescu: you're a nice guy, mod6, and your point is without merit. nevertheless, the whole thing's a bike shed. who the hell even cares what the infrastructure is like for handling six numbers ?
mod6: We are discussing/thinking about how to recapitalize, get more rockchips, customers. So this is on going. I don't think anyone is wasting anytime by any streach of imagination.[ ☟︎
asciilifeform: mod6: it was my understanding that all of the inventory work was already done.
mod6: I'm no accountant, or anything, however, I find it insane to try to keep track of things in a lisp script. Do we really want to debug our accounting things every week/month?
mod6: This is a simply, 'nice to have', in my personal opinion.
mod6: I don't think it is a 'blocker', but Mr. Vulpes will have to respond to that.
mod6: I've said this as recently as last week.
mod6: And I guess, it is not up to me how Mr. Vulpes wants to track these things for Pizarro, however, if I'm asked to make decisions, I EXPECT that these things are clear, in plain language.