99200+ entries in 0.057s
a111: Logged on 2018-05-16 04:56 mircea_popescu: and why is
the chassis 1k ? am i missing something besides "aluminum" ? and why is
the bitcoin 17252/2.75 = 6273?
a111: Logged on 2018-05-16 04:53 ben_vulpes: ~112 per RC, 2500
transpo, 1k for chassis, 4 chassis, 17,252
a111: Logged on 2018-05-16 04:51 mircea_popescu: fwiw, i see
the ROC-RK3328-CC at ~40
to maybe as high as 55 depending on quantity. 100 in one batch should be about 4000 realistically.
mimisbrunnr: Logged on 2018-05-15 15:37 mod6: ah, maybe
that as for 96. anyway, will wait for ben_vulpes
ave1: diana_coman, I will
try myself
too, but need
to do some disk shuffling first (I do not have enough room available). Could you send me
the config.log in build/build-bootstrap/binutils-2.25.1/build1?
spyked: ftr, I've gathered about 700k keys in
the last 3-4 days; if
the
total number hasn't changed
too much from
the previous 6.9M, I estimate I should have all of
them in 20-30 days from now.
☟︎☟︎☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-05-15 22:31 jurov: spyked, iirc we used 4 accounts and it
took about a month? surely it's in
the log
diana_coman: good
to know really; perhaps add
those notes
to
the post so it's all in one place?
ave1: note also,
that a lot of it is disk bound,
the run
takes longer with slow disks
ave1: btw
the build process is not small, (nothing is cleaned during
the run,
to get partial build running)
diana_coman: well, I'd rather cross compile
too if it works because
then I can use
the rockchip as launchpad for everything else, why not
☟︎ ave1: also you can drop
the x86_64, as you will probably not be cross compiling
to x86_64
diana_coman: ah, let me change
that and
try it again
then
ave1: it's
the 'build-ada.sh' script
ave1: so far I only ran
these starting on x86_64
ave1: then
the ada-build.sh needs adaptation
ave1: oh wait, you are running
the scripts on
the rockchip?
ave1: this seems
to be
the very first "real" step, compile
the binutils for your own system. it may be a CFLAGS problem
ave1: as for
the error, can you go
to build/build-bootstrap/binutils-2.25.1/build1 and paste
the config.log?
diana_coman: it seems it wants --host
to cross-compile
the x86
diana_coman: sure, I'll paste
the stuff
today and ping you
diana_coman: well, I was
testing so at least
tested it
to break it, ofc :P
ave1: I would be interested in how
the scripts failed on your side
ave1: btw, I've not
tried running
the scripts with
the generated native compilers, I always start with
the binary from adacore
ave1: I will update
the directory names as
this is now confusing
ave1: yes,
the original scripts only produced cross compilers, and
the new ones now also create "real/native" compilers
ave1: yes,
the non-native is a cross compiler, so run on x86_64 and compile for aarch64
diana_coman: I did not investigate further but I can do
that
diana_coman: basically
the non-native was not arm;
the native at least ran but
then
the script failed anyway
a111: Logged on 2018-05-15 21:50 diana_coman: and fwiw I
tried running from
there also ./aarch64-musl-linux-cpp -> same result
ave1: diana_coman, Sure no problem, I'll put it on
the site and send a link. Which one did you
try?
a111: Logged on 2018-05-16 04:19 ave1: it does not matter if
the linux is glibc or musl, I
tested also on a clean ubuntu arm64 image
diana_coman:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-05-16#1814099 <- hm, at least
the one asciilifeform obtained did not run on my rockchip (arm arch) so I might need
to look deeper into
this as
to why it didn't; at any rate: mind adding
to your post
the obtained gnat binaries so I
try with
them directly from you and
then report what fails if anything?
☝︎ mircea_popescu: it's not
the sort of question
that you can answer for yourself in a minute.
☟︎ diginet: yes,
that just made me more confused
a111: Logged on 2018-05-16 03:39 ben_vulpes:
http://logs.bvulpes.com/trilema?d=2018-5-16#356543 << i've got folks in-wot i've already pushing btc
to over amazon; i'm pretty comfortable with orders in
the range of 500-2000 usd; what i'm looking for are folks
that want
to eat on
the order of 10kusd of btc every month or so,
that's
the comfortable headroom i'd like
ben_vulpes: i'm running out of steam, will have
to resume
tomorrow unless mircea_popescu has pressing qs or comments
mircea_popescu: other
than
that, did you fuck anything
to include "index.html" ?
ben_vulpes: quite possible, i'll look at some others
tomorrow.
ben_vulpes: it
tries
to redirect
to what
the right url should be,
though
mircea_popescu: it is possible your
theme is not supportive of your directory structure.
try "custom structure" = "/%year%/%postname%/" ?
ben_vulpes: i have
the permalink structure as /index.php/year/month/day , but when i switch it over
to /year/month/day it 404's
ben_vulpes: well i got
the rewrite, but can't get mpwp
to serve at /y/m/d/post
ben_vulpes: so i guess
that i have
to
then write a regex
to capture all of
the old /index.html/y/m/d/post, redirect 'em
to /y/m/d/post
trinque: ben_vulpes: you're welcome
to snag
the /home/trinque/www/.htaccess
ben_vulpes: if any of
the mpwpists in
teh republic can lend a hand, i could really use it in getting urls
that don't have index.php in
them
ben_vulpes: i had
this in i suppose a
too-terse form
the other day; shall document with words and links.
mircea_popescu: re but also a week's stay, like if rich nsa is paying him a little vacation. altogether it comes
to
this much on
the basis of
those assumptions" and so on.
mircea_popescu: that's why it's important
to run documented estimates rather
than either loose or
tight estimates.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes, it's a
tight rope, either way can get unpleasant.
ben_vulpes: unpleasant
to run an estimate
that comes out kind of marginal and watch hopesndreams go up in smoke as reality sets in
mircea_popescu: absolutely fine, if not outright premier way
to maximize shareholder value.
mircea_popescu: the cheaper you get your stuff, you understand,
the more your intaingibles and equity lines are worth.
☟︎ ben_vulpes: i haven't updated
the rc price since
the pilot run, and
that number assumed 1
transportation run per chassis since i'd not gotten
the refutation of
that number until just now.
mircea_popescu: the "
the price inevitably dips"
theory works A LOT better if it doesn't have
to dip under 6k.
mircea_popescu: and why is
the chassis 1k ? am i missing something besides "aluminum" ? and why is
the bitcoin 17252/2.75 = 6273?
☟︎ ben_vulpes: ~112 per RC, 2500
transpo, 1k for chassis, 4 chassis, 17,252
☟︎ mircea_popescu: fwiw, i see
the ROC-RK3328-CC at ~40
to maybe as high as 55 depending on quantity. 100 in one batch should be about 4000 realistically.
☟︎ mimisbrunnr: Logged on 2018-05-15 15:37 mod6: ah, maybe
that as for 96. anyway, will wait for ben_vulpes
mircea_popescu: otherwise, nsa is not adverse
to making a new run, but it will
take a while.
ben_vulpes: ya reasonable, will answer on
the next context switch
mircea_popescu: you got
three items, shared, rc, rc+fg. you
tell us, which sells in what proportion
to what.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes, it's a significant chunk of
the cost of
the rc, you realise ? YOU should be answering
this, on
the basis of, what you can sell.
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: what fraction of
the plant do you figure should be equipped?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform, honestly, it can wait for
the better model. not like he's ~without~ fgs.