84000+ entries in 0.048s
mod6: !!invoice
trinque 0.02383823 July Invoice for colo service and shared shell at pizarro
lobbes: mircea_popescu:
this makes a lot of sense,
ty. Ima read diana_coman's blog post you referenced and study Mocky's style of communication. I will
then provide a proper eta
tonight
deedbot: Invoiced
trinque 0.02401750 << June Invoice for colo service and shared shell at pizarro
mod6: !!invoice
trinque 0.02401750 June Invoice for colo service and shared shell at pizarro
deedbot: Invoiced jurov 0.02083823 << July Invoice for
The Bitcoin Foundation's colo service. #foundation #pizarro
mod6: !!invoice jurov 0.02083823 July Invoice for
The Bitcoin Foundation's colo service. #foundation #pizarro
deedbot: Invoiced jurov 0.02101750 << June Invoice for
The Bitcoin Foundation's colo service. #foundation #pizarro
mod6: !!invoice jurov 0.02101750 June Invoice for
The Bitcoin Foundation's colo service. #foundation #pizarro
a111: Logged on 2018-07-26 01:37 mod6: *nod* was just hoping
to find
that btc/fiat price. I never did find it. Roughly, I
think
the price was about $6800 when it would have
transpired. But I'll give others a chance
to chime on
this before I make a June invoice for
The Foundation.
mod6:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-07-26#1837786 <<
trinque informed me
that
the June rate was actually $6742.
There are
two invoices
that are were never sent for June, I'll be using
this price point
to create
this invoice, instead of
the round $6800 number mentioned in
the linked log entry.
☝︎ mircea_popescu: not yet yelling at him --
that's gotta be good for something, yes ?
mircea_popescu: because unlike
the empire, where
they speak
to feel good, like birds chirping,
the republic has
the log and
the mechanism of inference, one can very effectually land self in soup. all it
takes is apply
the "i want everyone
to be happy" imperial process for a few passes, until you've loaded yourself into such a ball of inference no one can possibly managed.
mircea_popescu: consider
that
the "top of hopper" item ALSO means, and what it means in
this context is "i've not done anything for
two weeks seeing how i've not yet
touched my
top of hopper" "but mp... i got distracted..." "then WHY do you even have a
top of hopper concept, if distraction's
the law of
the land ?"
mircea_popescu: so saturday we'll be having
the same discussion in
the same
terms, "why have you [implicitly] promised something you didn't deliver", which is just not a good way
to go about
things.
mircea_popescu: absence is meaningful, you understand, and what
that absence means here is "not worth
the mention", which in
turn
translates
to "may default
to any reasonable value of your choosing" which in
this case means
to me "definite;y done by saturday". because
that's what i want it
to be.
lobbesbot: mircea_popescu:
The operation succeeded.
mircea_popescu: !Qlater
tell lobbes yet i noticed you've not provided an eta.
diana_coman: mod6, I don't recall: was
there any option
to pay yearly for
the rockchip?
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-07-26 19:51 mircea_popescu: lobbes_sans_znc ok but i mean, it's been
two weeks!
deedbot: Invoiced lobbes 0.03308823 << Rockchip invoice for 3 months of service,
through October 31st, 2018
mod6: !!invoice lobbes 0.03308823 Rockchip invoice for 3 months of service,
through October 31st, 2018
☟︎ mod6: ^
this is what you're looking at
to
take you
through
the end of October.
a111: Logged on 2018-07-26 19:47 phf: !Qlater
tell lobbes not sure
that you really need
to introduce emacs into
the mix, if it's not your first language. an exception in a
thread ought
to log itself, but you can explicitly hook into debugger machinery and capture it manually: common lisp has *DEBUGGER-HOOK*, which is documented in hyperspec. sbcl further adds sb-ext:*invoke-debugger-hook*. you should also check
that
those values are nil after you load your
lobbes: mod6:
ty for
the reminder. I may as well renew now. plox
to invoice for another quarter
mod6: diana_coman: Same message for you above here ^. However, you're all paid up
through August 4th.
mod6: lobbes: As a courtesy, Pizarro would like
to let you know
that your quarterly rockchip rental is up for renewal after July 31st. Just a heads-up. You can renew now, or on August 1st (or
thereabouts).
mod6: jurov: Is it ok with you
then (or easy enough for you
to do) if I do: !!invoice jurov [btc_amt_for_june] June Invoice for
The Bitcoin Foundation's colocation service. #foundation #pizarro
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes well, rather changes
the model from "What foundation got"
to "what foundation did". i really don't see
that's such a loss.
BingoBoingo: ^
Title Fixed: 'Anti-Racist' Football
Tournament Cancelled After Racist Violence Between Refugee
Teams
ben_vulpes: sacrifices
the public verifiability of "all foundation funds in addrx" but i don't know
that's so valuable; foundation addr could just be
the proverbial
tip hat with some change in it and
the curious are directed
to read statements
mircea_popescu: if you're
the
treasurer of x, !!invoice jurov for payments owed by x seems
the heart of sanity.
mircea_popescu: i dunno why you can't just you know, use
the account. if you're worried about mixage have #hashtags in
the invoice,
then you see
them in
the ledger,
this invoice is #foundation and whatrever.
trinque: when you invoice someone,
this is what you're doing, right? requesting a payment
trinque: if you're paying, invoice should've been issued
to you
trinque: but not going
to make
the definitions of
things squashier.
trinque: I dunno why you guys are making it complicated; you can either deposit
to mod6's account, or he can invoice you
trinque: why are
they invoiced
to mod6 if
they're for you?
a111: Logged on 2018-07-26 00:01 mod6:
trinque: Question for ya regarding how jurov can make a payment for
The Foundation's hosting fees at Pizarro: Is
there a way
that I can get an outside BTC address
to give him
that would go directly
to my deedbot wallet? I see
that I can do `!!deposit amount`, which might work, but it could be days before a payment is made. Is
this a problem?
Thoughts?
phf: system. slime/swank doesn't do anything smarter
than overriding
them with own handlers, so you should be able
to manually give yourself as much visibility as slime will give you.
phf: !Qlater
tell lobbes not sure
that you really need
to introduce emacs into
the mix, if it's not your first language. an exception in a
thread ought
to log itself, but you can explicitly hook into debugger machinery and capture it manually: common lisp has *DEBUGGER-HOOK*, which is documented in hyperspec. sbcl further adds sb-ext:*invoke-debugger-hook*. you should also check
that
those values are nil after you load your
☟︎ lobbes_sans_znc: Also: need
to fix my znc (hopefully 'fix' is simple as: box just restarted and znc did not)
a111: Logged on 2018-07-22 18:27 ben_vulpes: lobbes:
that
the outbox
table has entries in it suggests
that logbot-start-pg-thread was never called
mircea_popescu would like
to provide some air
to
the fine pizarro folk, but... !
lobbesbot: mircea_popescu:
The operation succeeded.
a111: Logged on 2018-07-09 22:35 lobbes: asciilifeform: can haz. I'ma move
this up
to item #1 in hopper
mircea_popescu: seems
to me pretty plain & evident which case is run my "i'm ugly but don't see why
this means i get no voice" "#metoo" and which is not.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform consider
the case of stupid kid coming back
to his stupid mother from "School" ie daycare, face all blodied up. case 1. "Who did
this
to you ?" "Joe Nobody!!!!" vs case 2. "Who did
this
to you ?!" "It was
the cosmic rays!"
mircea_popescu: luxuries few enjoy, you know,
the retort "ask your mother who i am" readily available for any "who are you" inquiries and such.
mircea_popescu: sitting
there in
their sad hovels,
trying really hard
to not say
the dragon's name.
mircea_popescu: anyway, it's funny
to me just how PAINFULLY aware all
the losers are, of
trilema, of
things.
mircea_popescu: as long as i've not
turned out
the dole, it'll sit an pretend like it runs
the world.
mircea_popescu: what else can it be ? nation of africa is nation of africa, has not produced any new ideas ever seeing how ~that's what it is~. definitionally, if you create a "set of all morons" you're not
to expect
them
to not be morons.
mircea_popescu: it's gonna be a "we're all equal and interchangeable
therefore so are you" and "in order
to swallow
things
too big
to be swallowed first cut
them into parts" and "if anyone gets in your way say
the magic words" and so on.
mircea_popescu: inca
tryna digest bitcoin before bitcoin digests inca. "aspects" being what enzymes say.
mircea_popescu: i like how "crazed fundamentalist" is how
the pantsuit says "people smarter
than me" nowadays.
spyked: in other news,
trilemabot part ii will be published later
today, with fresh coad ready
to be scrutinized.
spyked: ^ ftr, I'll be away starting
tomorrow for about a week. I'll use
this key during
the interval.
spyked: !!rate spyked_trvl 1 spyked's
travellin' riverside key
deedbot: Invoiced mircea_popescu 0.22505299 << S.NSA colocation (dulap)
through June 2019
mod6: !!invoice mircea_popescu 0.22505299 S.NSA colocation (dulap)
through June 2019
☟︎☟︎ mod6: I didn't say it made sense, just
that's what was done before.
mod6: Turns out
that
there is a mark-up, as opposed
to a discount for yearly.
mod6: ah, fair point, i gotta figure out what
the discount would be on a year-contract might be.
mod6: Good with
this
then
through June 30th of 2019? ^
mod6: *nod* was just hoping
to find
that btc/fiat price. I never did find it. Roughly, I
think
the price was about $6800 when it would have
transpired. But I'll give others a chance
to chime on
this before I make a June invoice for
The Foundation.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: mod6 really, don't dig
through
the logs worth more
than what
the difference is, you know.
mod6: mircea_popescu: S.NSA was paid up
through June 30th, 2018 for dulap's colocation. We can do another quarter (back dated
to July 1st)
that will carry S.NSA
through September 30th, 2018 for a
total of: 0.06251472 BTC (0.02083824 BTC/mo). If
this is agreeable, let me know, or if you have any questions.
trinque: but
that feature is entirely intended
to be used both for sending your BTC and for receiving it from others
trinque: (when I start expiring
them, will announce)
trinque: and no,
the deposit request wont expire or anything, in any amount of
time
that'd affect you
trinque: mod6:
that is
the way
to do
that, !!deposit
mod6: *on
that day, June 12th
mod6: I have pulled up BTC/USD chart of Bitstamp (no particular reason I picked
this exchange) between June 1st and June 30th. I can see
that
the price was roughly about $6800 per BTC on
that day. Unless anyone chimes in very soon about what
the actual price point was for
the month of June, is anyone opposed
to me using
this rate?
a111: Logged on 2018-06-19 16:04 deedbot: Invoiced ben_vulpes 0.40847278 << "wire
to
the Pizarro DC sent 2018-06-12"