log☇︎
8400+ entries in 0.015s
mod6: I think it was patch, but yeah, maybe I'm mis-remembering that.
mod6: updated
mod6: maybe i aught to add 'diff' on that list. it is inexplicable to me that it wouldn't be there, but then again, lol.
mod6: Thanks for taking a look shinohai
mod6: http://thebitcoin.foundation/trb-howto-new.html
mod6: Hi, I've updated the howto, it's not "finalized" yet. Please take a look and let me know if this doesn't read quite right, or if I've left something out: ☟︎
mod6: mornin
mod6: sure. keep it in your back pocket.
mod6: yeah, worth the hunting trip
mod6: hmm, nice test though
mod6: <+erlehmann> something involving a goedelized perl script that builds all build rules that don't build themselves. drugs were probably involved. << dafaq is this dude on about?
mod6: BingoBoingo: 7-ish
mod6: meanwwhile, I'll add a preface to the HOWTO doc on the minimum requirements. thanks to diana_coman for gathering them up once upon a time.
mod6: These problems should be resolved once sane environment is achieved.
mod6: edivad's environment is indeed some sort of non-developer version of linux that has almost no tools pre-installed. also, had some non-english version, which my V does not work with. Yesterday asked him to remove gpg v2, and install v1.4.10.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> meanwhile in lulz for alf, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1959633.msg19501495#msg19501495 << HEH
mod6: hi :]
mod6: evenin'
mod6: gotcha
mod6: smaller word size creates more iterations eh?
mod6: ah.
mod6: very nice work
mod6: ah, cool alf
mod6: shinohai: ah, not much
mod6: how goes?
mod6: mornin
mod6: <+asciilifeform> 'oops, we forgot to stack the deck. can haz backsies?' << lol, exactly
mod6: that whole scam reminds me very much of the alt craze of '13
mod6: lol
mod6: everyone is doin it
mod6: :D
mod6: aha, how monday should begin!
mod6: how goes today?
mod6: wb
mod6: mornin
mod6: 'One broker said a mortgage-free homeowner with a house valued at £10m had taken out a fixed-rate loan of just under £2m to buy bitcoin, ...' ^ ☟︎
mod6: you said this would happen too: https://www.ft.com/content/d175fc82-76a7-11e7-90c0-90a9d1bc9691
mod6: lol!
mod6: yowza
mod6: good! you?
mod6: Anyway, I'm guessing that you did. As long as you have all of the 0.5.4-RELEASE patches/seals/keys you should be fine. you could be correct about some of the alterations for locks not taking on the bsd-side.
mod6: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-08-06#1694494 << did you use your vtron here? My vtron does not support bsd at this time, when we have a working trb on bsd, then will support bsd. ☝︎☟︎
mod6: <+trinque> in theory, the "profile" mechanism would allow for a tmsr ebuild tree that could build on multiple chosen platforms. << this in fact, would be pretty neat.
mod6: <+trinque> http://btcbase.org/log/2017-08-06#1694394 << portage will sit down on BSD. I plopped it onto openbsd sometime earlier this year. << interesting. ☝︎
mod6: Don't think we ever pinpointed something though.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> http://btcbase.org/log/2017-08-06#1694393 << it's most likely deep in the bowels of bsd-bdb interactions. << ah yeah, maybe so. I recall digging into this on the bsd side. ☝︎
mod6: Perhaps this is something related to trying to handle the P2SH. Unsure at this point, but worth a look.
mod6: http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/jAbXo/?raw=true
mod6: also a while back guruvan brought up the fact that when BIP 16 (P2SH) was put in was in or around this block? maybe this block exactly (need to confirm still). But if you decode these:
mod6: gifs++
mod6: evenin'
mod6: here's the tx in question, exists in block 168`001: http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/In853/?raw=true
mod6: http://btcbase.org/log/2015-07-23#1210236 << I remember that we disagree even as to which block is the problem. ☝︎
mod6: etc.
mod6: InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000000000000a40136b height=168001 work=243841112905690411140
mod6: ERROR: ConnectInputs() : 2c2314f353 VerifySignature failed
mod6: received block 0000000000000a40136b
mod6: ----------
mod6: ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
mod6: SetBestChain: new best=000000000000099e61ea height=168000 work=243835201642261706754
mod6: received block 000000000000099e61ea
mod6: This looks like exactly what we've seen before, where 168`000 was accepted just fine:
mod6: *bit
mod6: Also, this is a non-deterministic problem, which adds to the frustration. You have a good candidate machine, it seems, to help get this resolved though. I'll dig through your logs a bot.
mod6: Second, I'm not sure how you want to make a Cuntoo out of BSD... we should revisit that later. ☟︎☟︎
mod6: I'd like to get to the bottom of this! ☟︎☟︎
mod6: I seem to remember this being specific to BSD, and in non-deterministic form. And looks like gernika for instance just simply resync'd and it seemed to not hit it again, for reasons yet unknown: http://btcbase.org/log/2015-07-08#1193289 ☝︎
mod6: Look. First off, no I don't believe we ever found the cause of this. I remember pulling my hair out trying to figure it out -- there are logs indicating as much.
mod6: I'm confused, are you saying that you're not interested in making a Cuntoo then?
mod6: I just rolled in, gimme some time to catch up and figure out whats what.
mod6: so run on linux then
mod6: take it easy. just asking as it was indicated to be source of previous 168k wedge issue.
mod6: meanwhile, what openssl are you using?
mod6: <+asciilifeform> phf, mod6 , et al : http://nosuchlabs.com/pub/168k.txt.tar.gz << log << /me looks
mod6: <+asciilifeform> mod6, phf didja see 168kisms on openbsd? << not me, but others did, see: <+BingoBoingo> http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=168000
mod6: <+phf> that's because you didn't try to simply use the patch to makefile that i posted on the list << i've had a trb openbsd since you posted this yes.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> blockheight ~= 60k or so << ah, bummer, no chain backup? ☟︎
mod6: <+asciilifeform> zoolag live as of now at ye olde 108.31.170.49 . << thanks for the update. ☟︎
mod6: cool alf
mod6: mornin'
mod6: yeah, takes some time to setup. well worth it in the end... just takes some time.
mod6: yeah that sucks
mod6: lel
mod6: sad
mod6: edivad: did you get it resolved?
mod6: <+asciilifeform> ( 'why should we ship dev tool! we're a binary turd, microshit by other name' ) << this
mod6: I did run into this once before with someone else, can't remember whom. But yeah, some default install of $linux that doesn't come with anything.
mod6: Haven't heard back yet, but instructed to install whatever package contains `patch` and proceed from there.
mod6: (He asked in PM)
mod6: <+ben_vulpes> edivad: what kind of system are you building trb on that shipped without `patch`? << this is the same thing I said.
mod6: ~fiddybux, nb
mod6: ah, cool alf
mod6: mornin
mod6: nice new trilema pic
mod6: wd
mod6: ah, did they enjoy?
mod6: lol, good stuff (tm)
mod6: heh shinohai, straight outta dalnet
mod6: asciilifeform: werd, thx for forwarding
mod6 looks