7577 entries in 0.137s
Framedragger: no but i've heard of it in logs. some approach to patching and (presumably) general version control? or more than that, even?
Framedragger: libressl uses comic sans to deter web people and dummy hipsters. that in itself adds +10 in my book
Framedragger: i mean let's say one wouldn't depend on gnupg or anything like that. fine. use RSA. but with the (admirable) level of scrutiny employed herein, i'd be wary of even suggesting a single implementation of RSA which would not be shitty. i mean, there is libressl...
Framedragger: i hear you. i'm just thinking in more mundane/practical terms, "can i build X without waiting for the everything i'd need for X to also be rewritten"
Framedragger: and accidentally won the netscape wars. or whatever
Framedragger: goddamn language was designed in under two weeks
Framedragger: "apparently you can't EVEN DO MATH in js" << yes yes YES :/ i knowz... that's why people want a web crypto api (crypto itself implemented in browser).. but the answer to your snarky follow-up "that just adds salt to the wound" is yes.. it's doomed
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: thanks, appreciate it. but damn does it depress me a bit, then
Framedragger: dunno, store/verify group membership via messages on OP_RETURNs (dunno if folks here frown upon storing data in OP_RETURNs)
Framedragger: i want to write something like this, but dread the fact that i would have to review a shitton of shitty attempts. one approach, i guess, is to just dismiss those attempts, come up with a sane and straightforward design, and implementing without too much fuss...
Framedragger: sounds like amusing examples too, will check later ($dayjob)
Framedragger: yeah i see what you mean. also nice to keep idiots in single basket
Framedragger: asciilifeform: do you have an opinion on IPFS (distributed storage protocol, of sorts)? spoiler: reference implementation is in golang
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: yeah ok i'm afraid i've to agree
Framedragger: > There's just no life in this idea as originally thought out, a browser thing.
Framedragger: maybe i have. look, i know those folks personally, by which i mean, not only over the internets. however, malice/incompetence are the same in terms of effects
Framedragger suspects mircea_popescu is baiting him about tor because he remembers those comments on trilema where framedragger said "evidence or gtfo mircea" ;)
Framedragger: ;;later tell Vexual missed your PM, msg me once you're online!
Framedragger:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-05-19#1468376 << yeah.. because fuck URLs amirite.. i'd think the nadim guy (of cryptocat) rebased commit history on purpose.. what's funny/sad is that many many stupid people did use cryptocat during those periods of encraption in cryptocat.. too bad for them
☝︎ Framedragger:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-05-19#1468376 << yeah.. because fuck URLs amirite.. i'd think the nadim (of cryptocat) rebased commit history on purpose.. what's funny/sad is that many many stupid people did use cryptocat during those periods of encraption in cryptocat.. too bad for them
☝︎ Framedragger: every time a re-read.. "The bug that lasted 347 days was the confusion between a string and an array of integers." 'nuff said. it's just good entertainment value
Framedragger: have you noted any of those instances on your blog on somewhere? would be an interesting read
Framedragger: i just think someone may have a hard on for hating X (for good reasons) but not dismiss things produced by X prima facie. then again, i suppose it's a useful heuristic in resource/time scarce universes to do just that :)
☟︎ Framedragger: well, agl is part of chrome security team, so i guess that's one more reason for you to dismiss pond
Framedragger: well, i too like non-garbage-collected no-bullshit systems languages. but golang is not shit just because it's golang. unless reasons? but maybe you've elaborated on this before..
Framedragger: gossipd is more of a federated social chat system i guess
Framedragger: ahhh. i should have known; hence all the names; thanks asciilifeform
Framedragger: i'd just think that they prefer that environment to the other, is all
Framedragger: ^ that's a bit incorrect, she's already been living in berlin, but had to visit family etc in US; so not really "on the run"
☟︎ Framedragger: mircea_popescu: great, thank you! will do (i'll be on-and-off today, too)
Framedragger: i wasn't sure whether you intended for there to be a facility to post unencrypted public texts, for example (that is, that there would be a way to not only encrypt text to recipient key or set of keys corresponding to, say, a particular group - but also to post plaintext for meet-and-greet, whatnot).
Framedragger: i guess i can post that text as comment on original blog post
Framedragger: yeah that is probably true. i didn't think it was worthy of a blog post so to speak, but yeh
Framedragger: "maybe irc bouncers for bad connections are a good idea" :)
Framedragger: i guess. i just made a literal mapping from own tongue onto english. but english failed on me :( so, "pompous"
Framedragger: i choose the "to shake a pompom vigorously" interpretation
Framedragger: i've to admit, even though this chan is full of pompastic arrogant fucks, the content is pretty sweet
Framedragger: oh - in regards to cookies - yeah it's not that simple i suppose, still need a third party
Framedragger: it's only possible for websites already participating in the agglomeration network