37800+ entries in 0.02s

mp_en_viaje: "This follows
the example set by
the Serene Republic" <<< something
tells me ima be reading
that ever more frequently.
mp_en_viaje: so im sitting here with coffee, disaronno an' excellent italian gelatto,
tryna find
the bottom. so far -- bottomless bimbos, as in
the celebrated "sfondami
tutta"
a111: Logged on 2019-04-08 17:48 asciilifeform: ~that~ is how sane folx build irons. and not idjit intel's 'i'ma happily execute
this random pile o'bits as a cpu instruction anytime' nonsense.
phf: i made a mistake of
trying
to rewrite url highlight in
term of message annotations.
the later is
the mechanism i use for xref and such, and it scans
the entire message corpus once, where's url highlight right now is done on each rerender.
OriansJ: asciilifeform: No, I just haven't seen anything worth discussing, as I am only here
to discuss
the bootstrapping of Sane Iron and I will be here until I keep my word
to bvt and have my discussion with mircea_popescu;
to see if
there is potential for mutually beneficial cooperation in regards
to Sane Iron and Need
to run something now.
☟︎ BingoBoingo: When I did my last ratings cleanup
there was a lot of "Who dat?
mp_en_viaje: this is a large part of what informs
the "no magic numbers" stance, for isntance.
a111: Logged on 2019-04-03 21:31 mp_en_viaje:
the driver of
the error is
the desire of having a ~unique~ personality. it is not deemed sufficient, by contemporary man,
to merely have
the same personality as
the entire
tableau of orthodox saints.
there's
too many of
those, see. gotta be unique. as it can't be unique and meaningful at
te same
time (think, can it ?)... all
that's left is
the getting-drunk-on-tapwater "secret parameters".
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, not a matter of softs.
the dram protocol's as hardware as it gets.
mp_en_viaje: exactly like if you agree
to make all diodes work on 10kv, you will not be able
to prevent enemy from cooking his breakfast on your computatron
mp_en_viaje: nevertheless, if you implement some dumb protocol, ~even if you implement it correctly~, and ~even if you use it on non-thompson hardware~, nevertheless you have a hole :
the dumb protocol, potentially doing who knows what on
the side.
mp_en_viaje: there's a lot of formal difference, of course. exaclty like
there's a lot of formal difference between fucking a crack whore in
the ass and fucking a strep
throat slavegirl in
the mouth.
mp_en_viaje: to restate
the point :
there's no substantial difference between a) using dns/ntp ; b) running windows and c) writing your own code
to run on your own hardware and interface with say dram.
mp_en_viaje: if you expect
to detect electically isolated islands, as what you mean by "optically",
then yes.
mp_en_viaje: but
the point here was,
that as long as what you're implemeting is, say,
tcp, or dram, what you will get is not in fact a safely auditable object.
mp_en_viaje: neither are you.
the only approach is
to not use
towers of shit.
trying
to calculate
the resonance frequencies of arbitrary shitpiles is going
to get you in
the same line as karman went
mp_en_viaje: i am not equipped
to evaluate
the geometry of a leverage of
tower of shit.
mp_en_viaje: now imagine a fpga, surrounded by 725 islands, leveraging each one
thing,
this is net-a
that is
tcp-ip-b,
that'
mp_en_viaje: how did
the carveout amplify discussions not occuring in
that room ? it did not.
mp_en_viaje: this happened, factually, in
the su embassy
thing with
the carved wooden amplifier
thingee.
mp_en_viaje: so : suppose a)
tcp/ip is intrinsically, by its very [deliberate, and previously uknown-ly so] design vulnerable
to "blowhammer", which is a class of yet undescribed attacks ; suppose your fpga includes an electrically-isolated leverage for a.
mp_en_viaje: i'll give you an example if you promise
to not focus on
the example.
mp_en_viaje: in short, we're not disagreeing about
the same
thing.
mp_en_viaje: the problem remains
though -- yes, perhaps in
the formulation of "hide it i nfabric",
the deeply imperial nature of X Y Z may be irrelevant. nevertheless,
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform,
the problem is not necessarily
the problem you wanna focus on.
mp_en_viaje: the correct modelling of hiding an alarm clock (slash
thorium bar slash live slavegirl slash angry ferret etc) is not a naive linear extension of captain koons' clever watch hiding
techniques.
mp_en_viaje: you know
the joke about
the guy who
thought "the more places i have
to hide
this alarm clock in,
the better chances
to escape with it" ? "what if it rings ?"
mp_en_viaje: this may also be
true, but
the
true constraint is
the relative height of
the previous objection. inasmuch as your ethernet stack looks like an ethernet stack, you're not hiding it.
mp_en_viaje: this much is
true. but
the point can not be easily avoided
that in fact
the use you intend
to put
that fabric
to is ~not~ homogenuous. at all.
mp_en_viaje: this, incidentally, has a romanian name, from
the 1800s, when
the romanians invented it. "teoria formerlor fara fond"
a111: Logged on 2019-04-08 15:03 asciilifeform: and what's moar, i've seen ~same nonsense pop up again an' again. 'we'll describe how satellite is launched , for audience of 8 y.o.,
this will SURELY put us closer
to actually launching one' etc
mp_en_viaje: though we're on
the 4th cup at
this
table... i guess if it runs long ima invoice you for nicole's coffeegreed
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, i
think i barfed at "nUxi", which is not, properly speaking, any particular endianism but
the necessary and equivalent result of mixing.
mp_en_viaje: seems more like we agreed on something or
the other last
time, and we agree on something or
the other
this
time, except
the
things
themselves may be bitflipped.
mp_en_viaje: the problem was not moving it back an' forth ; but
the dorky airlines giving up on life.
diana_coman: I
thought
that was exactly what hotel porters were for
though, hm