log☇︎
33700+ entries in 0.006s
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855108 << i read'em when waking, when going to sleep, and in between have scrolling in real time within peripheral vision. but evidently even this not guaranteed to suffice.. ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855107 << the proggy author's duty, and nobody can save him from it. fwiw i go roughly by size/complexity of orig draft. ☝︎
asciilifeform: ( pretty thinly disguised attempt to get the dumber miners to 'upgrade' )
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855104 >> bahahaha, and the disinfo machine already spinning at full speed, e.g. 'Everything older than 0.16.3 (and the corresponding 0.14 and 0.15 fix releases) is vulnerable to one exploit or another' etc ☝︎
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: yea, 10k is imho much. but e.g. asciilifeform gave himself 100 in orig v
asciilifeform: so makes sense
asciilifeform: yea i can't picture for what might need variable masses in production ☟︎
asciilifeform: will do.
asciilifeform: diana_coman: i'ma test & mirror that one when i get a chance
asciilifeform: neato!
asciilifeform: oh hey.
asciilifeform: elsewhere, else, http://trilema.com/2018/fetlife-the-next-derperation/#comment-126772
asciilifeform: ( asciilifeform plowed through the phf-vtronics thread when came back from voyage, and then second time when diana_coman requested keccak regrind, and both times failed to converge to correct answ re 'is there complete keccak vtron' )
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855078 << trickier item. recall 'the song of the sirens, some have escaped, but their silence -- no one' . how to deal with 'but ~was~ it in the l0gz'. ☝︎☟︎☟︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855070 << neato BingoBoingo . plz lemme know asap if you need anyffing from my end ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855075 << yea if i'd smoke-tested it earlier, would have found. on top of this, naively assumed that diana_coman has a working and complete keccaktronic v , given as she's moved smg to newform ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1855080 << i stole the notion , in slightly modified form, from knuth. the logic is, decrementing versions, with finite initial N, support a http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-18#1851362 flow , where 'if you fucked it N+1 times , nao forced to call proggy something else' -- specifically in opposition to the heathen plague of runaway ver nums (e.g. linux kernel, emacs, firefox, etc) ☝︎☝︎
asciilifeform: i'ma test.
asciilifeform: oh neato
asciilifeform: phf: exactly right algo
asciilifeform: trinque: recall when i thought that this nonsense could be disabled by flags, hah
asciilifeform: phf: imho your approach , i.e. dispensing with gnupatch, is The Right Thing, historically there was quite a bit of grief from gnupatch's habit of eagerly attempting to apply an invalid (by vtronic lights) but 'partially ok' by barbarian lights patch ☟︎
asciilifeform: i did not yet know this.
asciilifeform: esthlos's thing calls to gnupatch ?! ugh ☟︎☟︎
asciilifeform: phf: i finally sat down and properly read the thing, and i think i finally grasp.
asciilifeform: ( right now there's a linux-like situation where errybody has own flags etc )
asciilifeform: prolly will also makes sense to standardize the calling for it eventually ( and i'ma rework mine to fit, etc )
asciilifeform: makes sense
asciilifeform: trinque: which vtron are you thinking of including in cuntoo beta ?
asciilifeform: imho the situation where 'errybody made own hack' but no one posted 'because obvious' is a barbarism, really ought to have a civilized 'here is the whole thing' sitting on www somewhere. ☟︎
asciilifeform: btw phf , if you're willing to post your modified v.py ( i.e. http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854990 ) i'ma sign ☝︎
asciilifeform satisfied with the explanation
asciilifeform: phf: makes sense.
asciilifeform: ( i.e. i'd like to dispense with sha512sum util entirely , aside from existing ancient items which have sha512 hashes in the l0gz from years ago )
asciilifeform: then not direly needed. though i'd still like to be able to post keccak hash in the log next time we're doing a thread with fw images or the like.
asciilifeform: phf: ah huh
asciilifeform: phf: but yes i'ma revive it.
asciilifeform: phf: my orig vtron has been sad and unmaintained, and afaik unused by anybody by me, for long time
asciilifeform: phf: i don't dispute that it is obvious, but thought it had been done, this was my mistake.
asciilifeform: phf: right . what i was looking for is variant of same that calls out to keccak instead of sha512 ( mod6's latest vtron actually checks hashes ) . but apparently still needs baking.
asciilifeform: mod6: for nao i'll be entirely satisfied with the variant phf describes.
asciilifeform: phf: makes sense. my frustration is from walking the logs for past 2 days and looking for who has the complete shaft+head hammer, and not finding
asciilifeform: phf: loox like. i'ma put the head on the shaft in next coupla days .
asciilifeform: now i'ma need the shaft.
asciilifeform: this thread is not meant to insult phf et al , but i open box where i thought was hammer, but there is only a hammer head
asciilifeform: dun seem like we disagree then ?
asciilifeform: where is the 'fud' ??
asciilifeform: phf: there is not currently a complete replacement for mod6 v.pl ! fact !
asciilifeform: my ancient v100 , could also be reworked, but i'd like to put it to rest ( for one thing, it dun check hashes at all )
asciilifeform: i'd also like to see a continuing existence of multiple working vtrons, so eventually would like to rework mod6's to use newtype format ( unless mod6 would prefer to do it himself )
asciilifeform: afaik nobody's used esthlos's item in battlefield yet, it'll need good bit of test.
asciilifeform: once it ~does~ exist, and fully displaces the duct tape, then yes i'ma start regrinding other things , and i expect then mod6 -- trb, etc
asciilifeform: phf: this is not a criticism of the format. but turns out asciilifeform has been looking for a 'i missed it in logz?' piece that doesn't exist quite yet ( hopefully will in 3 days... )
asciilifeform: possibly this is not 100% fair picture , http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854956 is only half-handcranked, but still, semi-automatic ☝︎
asciilifeform: ( recall, i introduced the patches thing considerably prior to ~vtronic~ patches )
asciilifeform: apparently diana_coman has been hand-cranking it, sorta like asciilifeform's 1st yr of trb pre-vtron
asciilifeform: and yes it is the picture i got from log. the gap in my head is where diana_coman switched to the new format; i then assumed there is a 100%-complete new vtron, and that 'hmm simply missed this, is in log somewhere' , turns out nope, notyet
asciilifeform: phf: try an' see from my pov : i get a 'goddamn stop using old v' , go an' uncrate the replacement, and turns out it ain't a plug-in replacement but a set of pieces and a roll of duct tape
asciilifeform: mod6: puzzler -- solved, asciilifeform -- thick.
asciilifeform: ( fughot that they decrement ! ) ☟︎
asciilifeform: oh ha i see what i did.
asciilifeform: mod6: the latter was the one i turned out to have on my box last night
asciilifeform: mod6: that there's '99993 K' . but what was '99994 K' ??
asciilifeform bbl : teatime.
asciilifeform: ( given http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-26#1854819 + http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-26#1854820 , i'd really like to have a 100% working item prior to entirely retiring the old ) ☝︎☝︎
asciilifeform: if phf's item came with a standalone keccak hasher , would then be quite simple to retool e.g. mod6's vtron, to follow the new format. but as it is loox like i'ma have to wait for esthlos , to get full working replacement for old vtrons
asciilifeform: got it
asciilifeform: i'ma try esthlos's item as soon as it is rolled out.
asciilifeform: this is what i thought, and why i did not hurry to start the regrindings earlier
asciilifeform: so as i understand nobody has a 100% complete newtype vtron quite yet
asciilifeform: ugh suspected
asciilifeform: diana_coman: is there a version of mod6's vtron that uses the new vdiff / vpatch ? or what do you use in erryday work ?
asciilifeform read whole thing
asciilifeform: right
asciilifeform: aha
asciilifeform: danke schon, diana_coman . feel free to rename the filez.
asciilifeform: diana_coman: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=2557 updated, with mirror and seals (yours, mine)
asciilifeform: about to post
asciilifeform: confirmed
asciilifeform: and loox like diana_coman even added comments.
asciilifeform: ty diana_coman .
asciilifeform: aaand it loox like diana_coman already did my chore for me... i'ma do the elementary test on it nao, and sign/mirror.
asciilifeform: call me an idjit, but i thought there were a new vtron... ☟︎
asciilifeform: diana_coman: do you normally use this with a hand-patched mod6 vtron ? or how ?
asciilifeform: and apparently this is not a full vtron, but only replaces 'diff' and 'patch' ....
asciilifeform: aaaand built
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854935 << i did, phf reminded earlier ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854926 << ~this~ is pretty strange; diana_coman wouldja mind sharing your working set there ? ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854926 << confirmed ( and somehow nobody last night noticed ? ) apparently tar by default refuses to tar up 'hidden' ( i.e. starts with . ) dirs ! ☝︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854880 , http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-27#1854913 << interestingly, this worked, mod6 ! wtf is 99994 K one ? where did i even get it ? ( i take it , was buggy release ? ) ☝︎☝︎☟︎
asciilifeform eats log
asciilifeform bbl,meat
asciilifeform: loox like the matter may have to wait until the folx with working keccaktrons wake up and tell me what i'm missing.
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: if i'm not mistaken, you built and used this thing? with what didja do it ?
asciilifeform: for this, need keccak vtron. presently i dun have one.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu & diana_coman specifically asked asciilifeform to rebake udp proggy in keccak.
asciilifeform: y'know, thread, http://btcbase.org/log/2018-09-26#1854734 ☝︎
asciilifeform: keccak!!
asciilifeform: this thing is supposedly battlefield-ready, but presently loox to me like a ball of yarn for which no working build instruction is posted anywhere
asciilifeform: that very same.