log☇︎
230100+ entries in 0.055s
asciilifeform: well the only remarkable thing is that, with the profusion of winblows users, coins are not yet wandering off into usg wallets en masse.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: a skilled turdmeister (especially of the privvy-to-microshit-remote-orifice variety) will leave nothing to find.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: when anyone bothers - very laboriously, largely manually-cranked.
asciilifeform: i.e. winblows is the ultimate trojan per se.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: speaking not of wallet stealing trojan, but of 'xxxx coin wandered off with no plausible explanation, forensic showed nothing untoward'
asciilifeform: Adlai: but today is not that day. and when it comes, it will be coated in enough parallel construction to kill a herd of elephants.
asciilifeform: Adlai: there will come the day when winblows users dumb enough to run hotwallet will find their coin magicked away.
asciilifeform: Adlai: you must remember, we have not yet escalated to 'full throttle.'
asciilifeform: ahaha
asciilifeform: wai wat
asciilifeform: http://news.yahoo.com/nations-last-big-icebreaker-endures-despite-age-214106918.html
asciilifeform: speaking of ice...
asciilifeform: 'nobody ever got hanged for buying ibm stock.'
asciilifeform: folks who actually made their living on ships, knew better.
asciilifeform: the 'uncrushable' thing was more of a marketing literature, tbh
asciilifeform: curious why mr. l did not say this, then.
asciilifeform: 'everybody did it.'
asciilifeform: he's essentially sticking to the 'flondor defence.'
asciilifeform: the Atlantic Ocean.'
asciilifeform: L: Then all I can say is that recklessness applies to practically every commander and every ship crossing
asciilifeform: ice was in your immediate vicinity, to proceed at 21.5 knots.
asciilifeform: which you have described as abnormal, and in view of the knowledge you had from various sources that
asciilifeform: 'C: What I want to suggest to you is that it was recklessness, utter recklessness, in view of the conditions ☟︎
asciilifeform: see pg. 9.
asciilifeform: author of linked piece takes issue with l's conduct pre-sinking.
asciilifeform: well, yes
asciilifeform: baby - can kill with one hand.
asciilifeform: faraday's 'what use is a baby.'
asciilifeform: unwieldy, ruinously expensive, terrible ROI.
asciilifeform: very often, 'works' is like early lisp machine.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: this is why i mentioned schwartz example.
asciilifeform: quite a few of the ancient science-fictional machines of early 20th c. imagination.
asciilifeform: e.g., laser pistol.
asciilifeform: would make many things.
asciilifeform: horst wessel lied.
asciilifeform: auld lang syne, lol.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: try to picture how bitcoin would have been treated, even in the embryonic stage, if the implications for the next xxx years from it, were entirely obvious to all.
asciilifeform: in prolonging agony - quite a bit.
asciilifeform: under the bezzle, there is very little profit in solutions.
asciilifeform: (just one example)
asciilifeform: the folks who built careers on (promise of) the 'hot' variety.
asciilifeform: or bullet in head.
asciilifeform: modern-day physicists want a demonstrable equivalence principle violation the way they want horsecock.
asciilifeform: for the reason stated in the 'titanic' article.
asciilifeform: or rather, lack of experiment, because the entire sub-field formed a 'solid blue wall' against herr schwartz
asciilifeform: but the phenomenon described above is entirely the root of the al schwartz equivalence principle violation experiment
asciilifeform: story time. i don't personally have any truck with fusion, cold or not;
asciilifeform: re more important than experimental results. Lightoller, in effect, put traditions and customs ahead of the lives of passengers. To him, “the experience of years” and “what we have always done” outweighed all practical suggestions as to what we might do instead, to avoid killing thousands of people.' ☟︎
asciilifeform: 'If it ever becomes generally known that cold fusion is real, how will the scientists who opposed it react? A few may take responsibility and go down with the ship, retiring from academic life. I hope that most will regret their actions, and try to prevent such a thing from occurring again. Some will react the way Lightoller did, blaming Pons and Fleischmann. They may say the traditions and customs of science a
asciilifeform: which, i suppose, includes engineering.
asciilifeform: wood was a proper, full-bore polymath.
asciilifeform: ;;google robert wood n-rays
asciilifeform: was an unambiguous master of both magics.
asciilifeform: robert wood was probably the one notable exception to this blindness.
asciilifeform: see also james randi's notes on how physicists are easily fooled by methods that fool not one stage magician
asciilifeform: the linked article is at least partly about this.
asciilifeform: aha.
asciilifeform: almost as if they were living creatures trying to conserve energy or something
asciilifeform: although 'tilt' might be the more relevant pokerism
asciilifeform: aha
asciilifeform: *very
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: on the vary basic level.
asciilifeform: ^ very interestingly perverse comparison of the 'titanic' aftermath and that of 'cold fusion'
asciilifeform: without recalibrating, when in fact a good one will run reliably for months.' ( http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusion.pdf )
asciilifeform: still believes that cold fusion calorimetry indicates real excess heat, the frustrated expert may resort to extreme, untenable claims, such as a statement that no calorimeter has an error less than 10%, when in fact the error margin for top-quality conventional instruments is on the order of 0.1%. Or he may wave his hands and say calorimeters are so undependable that you cannot run one for more than a few days
asciilifeform: 'This sort of illogic is rampant in debates about cold fusion, particularly when experts respond to irritating, unwelcome suggestions made by amateurs. They start out cautioning the amateur that instruments such as calorimeters have a margin of error, and calorimeters frequently malfunction with leaking cooling fluid and other problems. When the expert senses the message is not getting through, and the amateur
asciilifeform: afaik yes.
asciilifeform: (open-source statistical gizmo, vaguely reminiscent of 'octave')
asciilifeform: around here, the 'common step away from excel' is 'r'.
asciilifeform: i wanted a book on 'j' 5 or so years ago, had to go to a library with spy camera.
asciilifeform must have slept through the re-appearance of 'j'
asciilifeform: not confusing with 'r' ?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: lol! you know actual 'j' users?!
asciilifeform: http://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/notation-as-a-tool-for-thought-wavelets-in-j << for aficionados of peculiar programming systems
asciilifeform: fingers - will of their own.
asciilifeform: i've probably crapped out every conceivable kind of mistake (when hammering in real time. text that i get to read again before broadcast - another matter)
asciilifeform: aha.
asciilifeform: and u.s. illiterates.
asciilifeform: http://www.dailykos.com/comments/1344589/54989752#c16 << extra lulzy
asciilifeform: same
asciilifeform: almost a 'newspeak'
asciilifeform: incidentally, this document is a fine example of the kind of stereotypically-bureaucratic style of writing usg runs on.
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: to cut to the chase, grep for 'ignition'
asciilifeform: real reason: it is an extraordinarily expensive, multi-generational project to keep the entire field from developing.
asciilifeform: to no result, as far as is known, ever, at any point
asciilifeform: where, for no reason that has ever been publicly explained, laser-initiated fusion is diddled ☟︎
asciilifeform: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f14/Volume%201%20NNSA.pdf << mega-turd. i don't expect that anyone will read it. but i did. and will relate, how obscenely it brags about the extraordinary bezzle of the u.s. 'national ignition facility' ☟︎
asciilifeform: t nobody was smart enough to see the next millennium coming.'
asciilifeform: obligatory naggum: 'suppose you thought of the new millennium when you wrote your application back in 1972 -- not only wouldn't you be invited to the party, those who knew you had done it right from the start and who probably laughed at you at the time would positively hate you now, and they sure as hell wouldn't tell people about you. and the more stupid they are, the more important it would be to pretend tha
asciilifeform: ( http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/14/us/politics/pentagon-studies-reveal-major-nuclear-problems.html ) ☟︎
asciilifeform: al said. This was one of many maintenance problems that had “been around so long that no one reported them anymore.”'
asciilifeform: '...in one case, the discovery that the crews that maintain the nation’s 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles had only a single wrench that could attach the nuclear warheads. “They started FedExing the one tool” to three bases spread across the country, one official familiar with the contents of the reports said Thursday. No one had checked in years “to see if new tools were being made,” the offici
asciilifeform: in other news...
asciilifeform: for those who missed, http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=13-11-2014#920112 ☝︎
asciilifeform: used to be called, 'cachiering'
asciilifeform: my guess is - yes, both.
asciilifeform: i imagine we will see
asciilifeform: 'is it rape if the check bounced?'
asciilifeform: i.e., borrowing $20m while broke and on food stamps? or fraudulently collecting food stamps while bathing in $20m bezzlars.
asciilifeform: real question: in which direction.