16000+ entries in 0.148s
hanbot:
<mircea_popescu> hanbot, quick solution is to restrict (and immutable) the directory right above the intended home.
<< actually, if i do that, it tells me permission's denied to land in homedir ("Could not chdir to home directory /home/username/: Permission denied") and dumps me in... /
☟︎ BingoBoingo: * mircea_popescu honestly thought this is the default, but apparently gentoo thinks /home should be 755.
<< Gentoo defaults are a strong case for a cuntoo split, even before getting into V and other Republican causes
mod6: (do a `ls -al
<dir>` to see the perms on the left most column, e.x. `ls -al /`)
BingoBoingo:
<ben_vulpes> imagine, if you lived online you could photoshop yourself into youth well into your thirties
<< As alf can attest there are specimines here who manage something similar to that by avoiding the mate crack pipe
BingoBoingo:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801964 << Nominally the main switch is capable of these things. I practice enabling these requires delicately ordered incantations I am hesistant to have executed on the production switch. It would require a second and someone with the hands to build a play network with with to test thoroughly before transplanting the config.
☝︎ mod6: I ruled already:
<+mod6> DISQUALIFIED
BingoBoingo:
<mircea_popescu> but i guess hacking up some of the trip pics into a theme for pizarro mp-wp can be your pet project
<< ascii_lander has been gathering quite the collection
a111: Logged on 2018-04-18 19:08 ascii_lander:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1802047 << understand correctly, i dun give half a shit if he cleans the gurlz and eats'em. what i dun like is liars. why does the d00d have to pretend 'they are at my party'.
deedbot: Invoiced mircea_popescu 0.04221665
<< s.nsa rackspace march 18 2018 - june 30 2018
deedbot: Invoiced mircea_popescu .4752
<< 1U server for s.mg april 18 2018 through april 18 2019
deedbot: Invoiced adlai .03413779
<< RK @ P april 19 2018 - july 19 2018
deedbot: Invoiced mircea_popescu 0.04344809
<< 1 rockchip @ pizarro, april 19 2018 -- april 19 2019
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-18 16:32 mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801945 << you'll have to explain to me the logic of this sometime. is there some expectation that all bipedals are human and made in the similitude of god or something ? animals are animals, whether superficially human or not, form does not trump structure. if they don't have the spark of humanity, which very much IS rsa key etc, then how's he remiss using them exactly as a chunk of wood, pi
a111: Logged on 2018-04-18 11:52 ascii_lander:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801594 << it was never my impression that we would do business outside of wot. ( can be any depth of wot, but imho to do business entirely outside of wot, is a sin )
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801956 << i expect. if it's as terrible as to have utterly no way of enforcing any kind of priviledged downstream, "all boxes you connect to this will forever be able to admin it", then we'll have to make a tmsr switch fw ?! but really, even the cheapest nat router available for $15 from radio shack has the capacity to not permit random box plugged in to alter the settings.
☝︎ mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801945 << you'll have to explain to me the logic of this sometime. is there some expectation that all bipedals are human and made in the similitude of god or something ? animals are animals, whether superficially human or not, form does not trump structure. if they don't have the spark of humanity, which very much IS rsa key etc, then how's he remiss using them exactly as a chunk of wood, pi
☝︎☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-18 11:34 ascii_lander:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-18#1801317 << aaand i betcha this is because they're camwhores, and have nfi what is pgp or even that d00d generated a key for'em at all , and he gave the magicstring over voicechat with the camgurls
ben_vulpes:
http://logs.bvulpes.com/trilema?d=2018-4-18#338352 << i've never done it on a live system, but setting PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" and PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7", and rebuilding @world, deep with newuse and then emerge -cav python_3 (or whatever the exact version atom is this week) makes for py3-free gentoo in my limited experience
lobbesbot: ascii_lander: Sent 2 hours and 22 minutes ago:
<diana_coman> fingerprint of server is not included; python is version 3.5.4, ugh
lobbesbot: ascii_lander: Sent 10 hours and 2 minutes ago:
<mircea_popescu> ok.
hanbot: mircea_popescu> ask hanbot she loved it lol
<< oh man visinata was great. and ckang no, not really --who gets drunk on cordials?!
mod6:
<+ascii_lander> phunphakt : when you give 'exclude' option to tar, it excludes RECURSIVELY all files having that name, regardless of depth. this cost us 6 or so hrs today.
<< Jeeze, sorry you guys had some battles today, glad you persevered tho!
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-17#1801142 << pretty great story. not to mention the obvious moral : "are you ruining your child's chances to a future by failing to provide a safe learning environment for him through your limp wristed inability to create a clear and present threat to violent bodily harm ?"
☝︎ diana_coman:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-17#1801097 <- mircea_popescu looking at it again from all sides I think the consideration is not necessarily misplaced in itself i.e. multi-packet there does make a mess out of the neat "these are the only *packets* you may ever send"; this being said though, I don't quite see the solution that would *also* preserve the desired "whatever it is, server responds the same: with a set of X keys"
☝︎ spyked:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-17#1800949 <-- could also be a turing-capable cpu that exposes the instructions natively after the program is loaded. the important part was re what the os itself exposes (or not, in this case) and how this relates to "makes no assumptions about P"
☝︎ BingoBoingo:
<mircea_popescu> aite.
<< I have been walking alf quite a bit here
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-17#1800914 <<< how it manages user interfacing is not even a consideration here. whether it returns control via pushing that specific-sounding button on the back left like the old tim-s ; or whether it has a software call implemented is irrelevant. not from a gui/ux perspoective, of course, but this is the fucking point of systems design as a discipline : that it does NOT consider other discipl
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2018-04-17 09:05 spyked:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-16#1799861 <-- I dun fully grasp this, so bear with me for a moment. suppose the following (imho no-nonsense) thought experiment: say we have an os, NOP-OS, that works as follows: after initialization, the os loads a (user-provided) program P; the NOP-OS interface exposes to P exactly one system call, "no-op", which does nothing and returns. is then NOP-OS a general-purpose OS? say we add another system
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-04-17#1800909 << wasn't, no. and yes, the ti-89, sure. or my ancient citizen solar powered item which i haven't seen for 15 years at the least but which was revolutionary for its time and literally worked by degrees -- if you obstructed two of its cell it could still slightly power the screen so it did.
☝︎