Mocky:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-24#1874402 << this suggests that each key holder can only host $key/gns at one ip address. And what about vpatch ordering and the v manifest file? If i have an entry for archive.is and want to change that entry, I can't just make and sign a patch of my own, i have to patch on top of the 'consensus' press, otherwise manifest won't match and can't press multiple heads. Am I wrong about how that works?
☝︎☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-11-24 19:51 mircea_popescu: i ~suppose~ one manner of handling this is the followingf convention : patches to be acquired from $key/gns/ dir, for all keys in the seals ring. so it'd look for "6160E1CAC8A3C52966FD76998A736F0E2FB7B452/gns" which is not a "valid" domain per usg.verisign "rules" however it DOES resolve in our own system. because we can put ips on anything we want.
Mocky:
http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-01#1910435 << using gns as proposed, I don't see any other way than passing out ip based links. I can't send a blog link to a slut on fetlife who doesn't have cuntoo, nor can i send a link to cuntoo guide. The whole thing seems like tree forts connected with tin cans and string. For gossipd I have no objection, for name resolution of published material? How is it even published if 'must be this tall to
☝︎ Mocky: ride' plus 'this tall' means in my wot?
☟︎ Mocky: I see embrace and extinguish as more appropriate for dns destruction (ala a dnsmasq-esque approach) than isolated bunkers. I mean, i could have joined up with republic prime instead, but they already completed work on gns prime, and maybe they passed out ip based links for a while, but eventually pulled up the ladders to their tree forts and now they can't even be found. So who knows if republic prime or double prime even exists.
☟︎ Mocky: what's the point of having names if I have to also be ready with the ip addresses all the damn time?
Mocky: i would prefer, 'that link to mocky.istheshit/proof doesn't work? you must have a shitty dns client, here's the right one...'
Mocky: 'your machine is broke, here's the fix...'
Mocky: 'this tall' to have your own actual domain: yes. 'this tall' to follow a link: no.
☟︎☟︎ diana_coman: Mocky: isn't the "right one" dns client you're talking about simply a bridge? i.e. sure, have as many bridges as you want, too, what exactly is the problem?
a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 03:18 Mocky:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-24#1874402 << this suggests that each key holder can only host $key/gns at one ip address. And what about vpatch ordering and the v manifest file? If i have an entry for archive.is and want to change that entry, I can't just make and sign a patch of my own, i have to patch on top of the 'consensus' press, otherwise manifest won't match and can't press multiple heads. Am I wrong about how that works?
mp_en_viaje: so if there's say people a - f and patches counted numerically, supposing you have 1(a-f) -> 2(a, b) / 3 (b c d e f), patch 4 for someone who has a seals list made up of a, b should be on 2,
mp_en_viaje: whereas patch 4 made by someone whose seal list is b c should be on 3
mp_en_viaje: whereas someone who has only b should patch, i suppose, on both 2 and 3.
mp_en_viaje: this produces what looks like a potential problem, in that we'll end up with ambiguous multireferences to same name. i believe this is no problem at all, but merely a licked tooth, and should be kept as such.
mp_en_viaje:
http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-03#1910987 > i haven't used civillian dns for what, two years now. i dont' care to, either. this usecase is massively more important than "fetlife slut". for one thing, fetlife slut ain't reading anything anyway ; for the other thing, nothing forces you to limit yourself to gns if you don't want to.
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 04:22 Mocky: ride' plus 'this tall' means in my wot?
mp_en_viaje: how would fetlife slut know about gns anyway ?
a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 04:27 Mocky: I see embrace and extinguish as more appropriate for dns destruction (ala a dnsmasq-esque approach) than isolated bunkers. I mean, i could have joined up with republic prime instead, but they already completed work on gns prime, and maybe they passed out ip based links for a while, but eventually pulled up the ladders to their tree forts and now they can't even be found. So who knows if republic prime or double prime even exists.
a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 04:38 Mocky: 'this tall' to have your own actual domain: yes. 'this tall' to follow a link: no.
mp_en_viaje: obviously in time you'll discover that it's eminently not WORTH it to pay 10 bux or w/e to random empire of idiots pretend-authority. and obviously you'll discover it's fun to declare google.com or w/e whitehouse.gov == pronhub. but these future discovery is neither here nor there ; and the fact that my email currently addressed to mp@whitehouse.gov will start even being delivered once gns is live also doesn' tmatter that much
Mocky: so re your patches example, if patch 2 & 3 both declare patch 1 as parent, and I have wot keys for all a - f, I can't press to both heads correct?
Mocky: the idea seems go be that different people have their own view of hosts file updates based on own view of wot, however, it only works a) without the manifest file and b) pressing to all heads, not just one
Mocky: what would it even look like pressing to multiple heads at the same time? how can you get the updates in both patch 1 and 2 if they are siblings?
Mocky: i'm off to kick some ass and take some names, bbl
mp_en_viaje: Mocky, i dunno what you mean. it almost reads like you're talking from a complete unfamiliarity with V altogether. what do you mean even, "press multiple heads AT THE SAME TIME". any v tree permits any v operator the choice of where the fuck to press to. if the tree is 1->2->3 you can choose to press to 1, 2 or 3. this is not "at the same time".
☟︎ mp_en_viaje: moreover, the selection of seals you put in your seals dir permits you to choose from a multitude of different trees.
☟︎ mp_en_viaje: indeed, if the set of signatures in your seals dir signs a bunch of different possible trees, the situation becomes ambiguous. i was saying, i don't think this is a problem at all (if for no other reason, then because either the user cares or doesn't care. if he does care he can just sign whichever he prefers, then put his own signature in the seals and presto. if he does not care then he doesn't care.)
mp_en_viaje: then again, if the user cares about the signatures in his seals NOT doing this in the first place, he can just nuke whoever who does do it (and can use his own sig to bridge whatever bridges he wants bridged)
mp_en_viaje: whichever way this is turned, i dun manage to see what the problem is.
diana_coman: fwiw I don't get what the issue is there and what does the manifest have to do with anything
diana_coman: i.e. manifest is a history with dates but not some prescription re patching
diana_coman: and a sig on a patch to my mind can't anyway be in isolation like that, "just this patch here is fine but I have no idea of what is being patched"
mp_en_viaje: but yes in this case the manifest is possibly spurious, as you're always changing the same one file anyway
diana_coman: and the contents of the manifest file itself are obtained from pressing a tree so it's not like you get mismatch tree <-> manifest and a tangle or I don't see it
BingoBoingo: Aite, I can see how whaack kept on the German chicks
a111: Logged on 2018-11-01 01:08 mircea_popescu: they don't got the guts to qatar/burma anymore, that's for damn sure.
mp_en_viaje: but so far -- as i remember. the females are brave, the males inconsequential.
mp_en_viaje: kinda how ye olde austro-hungarian lands work, from bohemia to lithuania etc.
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 04:38 Mocky: 'this tall' to have your own actual domain: yes. 'this tall' to follow a link: no.
a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 08:18 mp_en_viaje:
http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-03#1910992 << what exactly can possibly prevent you from keeping retarded dns if that;s what you want ? i mean, just because i'm not stuck editing /etc/hosts by hand all the time does it mean anything about that ?
mp_en_viaje: asciilifeform, actually she's midly famous pron girl, "bailey helen"
mp_en_viaje: only notable because reclaiming name of old guard pantsuitist mayo.
mp_en_viaje: but no, w/e this 4 star hotel thinks is an adequate infrastructure. w/e, house of sluts. moving tomorro.
mp_en_viaje stopped at "Public House" 4 star hotel earlier walking about. "i don't think they know what public house means", quoth i to my girls. "of course we do!" quoth reception desk gal.
mp_en_viaje: maybe it really is a brothel ; i doubt it tho, looked like slightly ditzy run of the mill.
lobbesbot: asciilifeform: The operation succeeded.
auctionbot: Buy order # 1047 created by BingoBoingo: 500 WFF, WU esta bien Opening: 154mn ecu Ending: 2019-05-07 04:56:28.887251 UTC (95 hours)
BingoBoingo: ^ PeterL mats_ jurov lobbes and other interested parties are welcome to begin bidding to set this month's exchange rate
auctionbot: Buy order # 1047: 500 WFF, WU esta bien Heard: 124mn from PeterL. Ending: 2019-05-07 04:56:28.887251 UTC (95 hours 57 mins)
auctionbot: Buy order # 1047: 500 WFF, WU esta bien Heard: 120mn from jurov outbidding PeterL. Ending: 2019-05-07 04:56:28.887251 UTC (95 hours 24 mins)
a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 13:59 mp_en_viaje: kinda how ye olde austro-hungarian lands work, from bohemia to lithuania etc.
PeterL: maybe the 10th century southern limit of Lithuania was within the largest extent of AH, but most people don't think of that as part of Lithuania
auctionbot: Buy order # 1047: 500 WFF, WU esta bien Heard: 114mn from PeterL outbidding jurov. Ending: 2019-05-07 04:56:28.887251 UTC (94 hours 29 mins)
BingoBoingo: ^ The tor woodchipper continues consuming derps
lobbesbot: phf: Sent 5 hours and 9 minutes ago: <asciilifeform> canhaz #p logger ? ( or a 'when' at least ) ? ty
a111: Logged on 2019-05-01 08:08 mp_en_viaje: phf, what are you doing these days ?
Mocky:
http://btcbase.org/log/2019-05-03#1911019 << I stated my assumption, for confirmation, that you can't press to both heads, and you answered with "why not?", and I followed up with 'what would that even look like?' I stated in two different ways that I'm talking about sibling patches with the same parent, not 1->2->3. did you even read what i wrote?
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2019-05-03 12:18 mp_en_viaje: Mocky, i dunno what you mean. it almost reads like you're talking from a complete unfamiliarity with V altogether. what do you mean even, "press multiple heads AT THE SAME TIME". any v tree permits any v operator the choice of where the fuck to press to. if the tree is 1->2->3 you can choose to press to 1, 2 or 3. this is not "at the same time".
Mocky: I don't have time to expand now before I go, but i can expand later.
Mocky: and i can also expand later on what's with the 'connecting', tcp? and what's with the directories, protocol on top of tcp? I'm hoping that its figurative and you don't literally want to build gns on tcp and
http mp_en_viaje: mkay, the breakage here's more than i know how to readily address.
mp_en_viaje: e this situation therefore i say "apparent unfamiliarity".
mp_en_viaje: in any case i'd say just about any single implication you propose doesn't follow. elementarily different people having differing views of a patchset on the basis of their seals works just fine with manifest files as without. and so on.
mp_en_viaje: to put in in those terms, the problem ain't so much that i didn't read what you said ; the problem's rather that nor i nor anyone else seems to know ~know~ how to read it.