log☇︎
95900+ entries in 0.019s
asciilifeform: of 'MUST find header'
asciilifeform: Framedragger: it was picked as example !
asciilifeform: Framedragger: if you're building for a unixlike, you're stuck with pthreads
asciilifeform: trinque: except that it doesn't enable anybody -- if autoconf fails to find the headers, you are just as fucked as ever, gotta sit and puzzle out what environment flags to give it so that it has a sporting chance
asciilifeform: the living mushroom, with his beard having crumbs from 1985 in it somewhere still. and his circle.
asciilifeform: it is not a mystery that such a thing originated from people with NO concept of hygiene.
asciilifeform: to expand: say your proggy uses, i dunno, pthreads. wants to know where to find the header. WHY does this turn into a MB of scriptolade liquishit ? rather than a 1liner, that tries to find it and if not finds, prompts the user ? ☟︎
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-22#1526720 << thread. ☝︎
asciilifeform: a fix for a 'problem' that simply does not exist on a halfway-wellmaintained system.
asciilifeform: it's a 'tv raft'
asciilifeform: it isn't clear to me that autoconf was EVER necessary
asciilifeform: ( lives here, http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1533 )
asciilifeform: worx great, even on crapple
asciilifeform: hey i deautoconfed gpg's mpi lib 100% ☟︎
asciilifeform: a MB of autogenerated (by whom ? when ? where ? how ? no one knows for certain) liquishit -- is not readable.
asciilifeform: vpatches are to be ~readable~.
asciilifeform: the far bigger boojum is that ~95% of the tarballs include megabytes of autoconf liquishit. ☟︎
asciilifeform: if only it, though.
asciilifeform: (yes, motherfucking binaryturdolade in 'open sores' tars. e.g., graphics.)
asciilifeform: trinque: my last attempt at 'vtronic portage' ran into the brick wall of 'there are nongenesisable items in the tarballss'
asciilifeform: some folx actually have variant use scenarios, and variant hardware.
asciilifeform: not everything is a matter of 'ugh, dbus'
asciilifeform: x11 and traditional
asciilifeform: actually trinque i know of at least 2
asciilifeform: trinque: expand plox
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-04-04#1636903 << old sovj0ke: 'flyer hangs on barrack door in buchenvald: 'tonight: DISCOTHEQUE! machine gunner Hans will play his two new disks !' ☝︎
asciilifeform: (big heavy thing, with msdos box attached, no less.)
asciilifeform: at asciilifeform's first (dis)honest job, there was a scintillator counting machine based on this principle.
asciilifeform: if you wanted to be even more clever, could use strictly beta detector, and rely on the fact that the things go in two opposite geometric directions every time.
asciilifeform: if close by.
asciilifeform: 1 photon sets off 2 detectors ~equally well as 1.
asciilifeform: ( now, good q is 'why do this?' and answer is -- 'you get analogue rng that is VERIFIABLE, just like the digital board in fg.' because you can pick up decay from below/above the board !!) ☟︎
asciilifeform: there is, however, a correct part for this : 'PIN diode.' i have an experimental setup with one. at some point we might offer a fg rng module based on it. but not yet.
asciilifeform: no good for particle event.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: solar panel is not a 'fast' device.
asciilifeform: this means GHz counters, in the most obvious embodiment
asciilifeform: *max entropy from
asciilifeform: (whereever you are -- there is background gamma)
asciilifeform: now the other, moar exotic, approach, is that you can try to extract mass entropy from background gamma
asciilifeform: it is one of the two reasons we aren't selling one (the other being, that it is difficult to get even mild isotope, through post office)
asciilifeform: upstack mircea_popescu had the right notion, though, it is difficult to build a decay rng that does not rot.
asciilifeform: but yes, the taper off to zero is at a few m.
asciilifeform: ( if it were 'm' : tesla's 'death ray' -- would work. )
asciilifeform: and cm.
asciilifeform: of air.
asciilifeform: aha, so is the chair fall..
asciilifeform: practically -- not.
asciilifeform: i.e. theoretically -- yes.
asciilifeform: beta will go a mile like mircea_popescu will sit down in his chair and go through the floor and into china sea.
asciilifeform: if constructed properly.
asciilifeform: they go ~0 distance ~into~ the solid.
asciilifeform: that's the tricky bit. also cherenkov has 0 to do with mechanism here, straight charge transfer.
asciilifeform: dram, rather.
asciilifeform: put the von neumann debiaser in each 'pixel', also.
asciilifeform: it would probably be something like an sram but doped with a very small bit of beta emitter isotope
asciilifeform: i've given some serious thought to 'what would be highest bit rate honest rng possible with current tech'
asciilifeform: and the reason for this is this.
asciilifeform: for which 100, say, is still modest number.
asciilifeform: or, elsewhere, for, say , otp gen.
asciilifeform: for the test beds, noshit
asciilifeform: (apparently no moar than 13 FUCKGOATS can be plugged into 1 usb host. because Reasons.)
asciilifeform: in other lulz, 'XHCI (usb 3.0) in linux kernel is limited to 32 devices. It looks like a bug.'
asciilifeform: (and -- just barely.)
asciilifeform: bdb does.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: 'surprise!' -- it doesn't
asciilifeform: ( or your own parser, for that matter ! )
asciilifeform: tx format was exhaustively described therein.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: see my ada snippets from last week, pasted here
asciilifeform: phf: that's whole planet. with possible exception of japan -- country of nursing home.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: it isn't hard to do, no; i have it (tentatively) working right here. but -- it ~is~ O(n).
asciilifeform: and i dun give a nanofuck that 'nightclubs there are small and crowded'. su circa 1975 had 0 nightclubs and i'd pick it over anywhere in known solar system, yes i would.
asciilifeform: a former neighbour -- also, and ditto
asciilifeform: phf: yeah -- my mechanic is from buenos aires, and excellent conversation
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: what precisely are you thinking of attempting?
asciilifeform: ( i will say, 0 of the things that drove mircea_popescu barking mad about the place, bother me at all. then again i was there for a week.. ) ☟︎
asciilifeform: phf: it left a pretty good-looking corpse, phf
asciilifeform: i'ma bbl, gotta change gask mask canister; and pet has been 'come to bedroom!111' for 2hrs nao..
asciilifeform: it makes 0 sense to merge the categories.
asciilifeform: i have plenty of 'c machines' right here that cannot run trb (on account of 'too small addr space' or 'too slow clock', take your pick.)
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: titanium car would work quite well.
asciilifeform: it is related in that it makes 0 sense to include 'c' as part of its identity.
asciilifeform: to become legitimately 'an algorithm', rather than 'this thing a particular moron shat out'
asciilifeform: it has to cease to be a cpp proggy.
asciilifeform: but of the nature of the beast.
asciilifeform: not speaking of machines here, i dun have a 'large comp that ain't a c machine' to even test with.
asciilifeform: the drooling idiot's 'i will Define By Implementation!' horror.
asciilifeform: at any rate this is a bizarre line of thought. trb (or rather, bitcoin, the existing network) has any kind of long term future ~strictly~ if it can be entirely separated from the cpp abortion.
asciilifeform: not one that has 64k of addr space, say.
asciilifeform: regardless of how built.
asciilifeform: this is not much of a definition, it encompasses more or less any comp that is large enough
asciilifeform: ('nqb' for instance is about half of a zero-otherpeoplescode implementation of same.)
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it ain't 'the software', either, it's a set of algos, they do not even take much paper to describe.
asciilifeform: trb (the currently existing item) could quite conceivably run on entirely different type of machine, under emulation (smbx , for instance, shipped... believe -- a c compiler, in genera. along with fortran, ada..)
asciilifeform: 'c machine' has a specific meaning, refers to the type of cpu that traces descent to the transistor-impoverished 1970s, when bounds check was seen as unaffordable luxury.
asciilifeform: 0. but it is imho odd to describe the process as 'fixes c machine'
asciilifeform: by looking at the data structures.
asciilifeform: but i found out with pen and paper.
asciilifeform: i can't speak for others,
asciilifeform: ( this also ignores the -- screamingly evident -- fact of trb being ~algorithmically~ defective. as explored on several occasions here. )
asciilifeform: and this 'fixes c machine' how ?