log☇︎
83100+ entries in 0.6s
asciilifeform: try as i might, i was unable to zap the space between the < and (.
mircea_popescu: i need roger ver percent because i don't want beer to dictate my body shape!
shinohai: I loll'd at his tweet earlier this morning, so ecstatic that they have 1% of all mining power on their phork
mircea_popescu: what's to elaborate, i have nfi what the guy you quote wants to do.
shinohai: As long as I have a gas station to work in, I can ride out teh storm and keep huffin'
mircea_popescu: i dunno anything makes one so happy as derps who dunno when to quit.
mircea_popescu: but i thought come at me bro!
BingoBoingo: "I bought this toilet and it already had shit it it!"
BingoBoingo pretty sure that is the wrong cart for that load https://i.imgur.com/qE6kGWQ.jpg
shinohai: I guess they figure they need to send the big cheeses after you.
mircea_popescu: shinohai i lullzed.
mircea_popescu: trinque i think you're on to something.
ben_vulpes: but that's the best i've found as well.
mircea_popescu: i guess ima go with http://trilema.com/2013/how-to-airgap-a-practical-guide/#selection-89.209-89.346
mircea_popescu: and i'm going to write up that " "If you need more security than RSA-2048 offers, the way to go would be to switch to elliptical curve cryptography" nonsense ; because it's getting ridiculous
diana_coman: only latest version of ubuntu claims to have 1.3.3-1 rhash but by this time I'm not even sure that is what it claims anyway
PeterL: I don't think it matched up with sha2 either
diana_coman: it's version 1.3.1 in the repos from what I see
trinque: ben_vulpes: I'd rather freeze an openbsd and steal portage from gentoo
mircea_popescu: ah, this is only vaguely related to eulora ; inasmuch as i've decided to keep snapshots of known-good linuxen and in the process discovered the horribru state of "open source" opsec
trinque: sure if he meant end user of Eulora compiles. I understood that most of them download binaries.
PeterL: I guess I misunderstood what you proposed
trinque: PeterL: I just proposed that.
mircea_popescu: i suppose no marketing budged to pay for this awareness, however. gotta find better awarenesses.
PeterL: I thought it was the cajuns that made everything out of mayo?
ben_vulpes: hey, midwesterners use mayo as a food base, i have nfi when y'all are joking
PeterL: did I forget the sarcasm tag again?
PeterL: because I just installed it
PeterL: I am confused, yes it does
mircea_popescu: PeterL i'll ask you what i asked him : does it do it on your box ?
trinque: so when I want to "join" across all this data I get to munge strings like some barbarian
phf: when i learned unix from graybeard, i was actually told things like "have your etc mounted read only for day to day operation, have your var on separate drive since that's where all the thrashing is" etc.
trinque: I can only assume "go in through my stomach" is "abdomen" for the anatomically illiterate.
trinque: then there's /opt which roughly translates to "fuck it, I'm putting this turd all by itself in say /opt/rhash-1.3.3/"
PeterL: I learn so much hanging around here!
PeterL: now, how do I go about removing the old version and replacing it with the new one I just built?
PeterL: 9c5bbf00bb6103c7f3d91fe598489725341010b8d0785274029d4645c34ebe9c (stdin) << must be something to do with the older version I got from apt-get, with newer version I get this hash
shinohai: just got back, I get:
PeterL: should I be worried that I am getting a different value?
phf: fwiw i tried both echo foobar and echo -n foobar
PeterL: hmm, I get ec7f27c2fb6588d30116d0abd380354bd73b9100e4ad2520c099c0716895ca70 (stdin)
phf: i get this on local machine
PeterL: aha, this is the actual reason I was looking through FAQ: "SHA-3 is a completely new hash algorithm that makes a clean break with the previous SHAs. It is believed to be safe, with no warnings about its usage. It hasn't yet been officially introduced into the OpenPGP standard, and for that reason GnuPG doesn't support it."
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: there was a reason i did not use sha3 in the lamport tutorial.
mircea_popescu: anyway, i AM mildly curious how many here present can actually calculate sha-3 512 (ie, keccak) from command line.
shinohai: so I'm willing to bet phuctor has em already
thestringpuller: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-06#1553536 << i use it to find the plug. people as close as possible with regular access to clean btc with no KYC links. based on dealings in our good 'ol city I think there is a small underground miner consortium. ☝︎
thestringpuller: gotta case the trap spot first. honestly with street trapping you should have a shadow or two...some muscle...but I didn't want to imply i endorse violence in the article
thestringpuller: i really should change it. thx.
mircea_popescu: can put in http://wotpaste.cascadianhacker.com/ or else make a v out of them i guess.
mircea_popescu: neither have i
mircea_popescu sings... for the water is wide, i cannot get o'er
mircea_popescu: and i'm still not done.
mircea_popescu: for the past five fucking years, nearly, i've been in the process of getting rid of the crap
mircea_popescu: oama i thought they just aimed to suck the dick.
shinohai: I should feed all dem keys into phuctor
mircea_popescu: i dun wanna be the king of cattle.
pete_dushenski: hm. i meant bermuda didn't i. this is what happens when you semi-retire!
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo> trinque: Nah, its the Ulbricht circle jerk again. Admit thing is yours to invoke privacy while admitting guilt << that was pretty ridoinculous, i recall. "you have a choice of self-incriminating through avenue a or b ; with a as the default if you pick nothing. what's your choice ? whadda ya mean this is nonsense, that's how we pick presidents also! GREAT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICA!"
BingoBoingo: I mean you could take it down to 1.5cm or lower
pete_dushenski: afaik i'm their only client
pete_dushenski: mulch guys are still ready and willing but my properties have exceedingly little streetscape so i only need them once or twice a year
pete_dushenski: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-05#1553342 << i lolled ☝︎
a111: Logged on 2016-10-05 17:48 PeterL: I guess I deserve it for going to junk-food (heavy on the junk) places
pete_dushenski: i dun think jews figure into 0.05% of pop here. and yet, the 'yud' arena is a thing (http://www.contravex.com/2016/09/22/drake-summer-sixteen-tour/#footnote_1_16519). go figure.
BingoBoingo: I've also been looking into starting a Monsanto and marketing "Priviledge" as the banner product.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: AHA, I've been looking into how to cover.
pete_dushenski: ben_vulpes: ayup. 68 connex when i last checked a few hours ago. yours too ?
ben_vulpes: if you use that sexpr for anything automatedly, keep in mind that i will be transforming the list of transactions into an alist keyed on tx hash (aka id) once i get the db in place
shinohai: feebs secretly arrest nsa contractor I missed that one http://archive.is/RclkQ
shinohai: I still have nfi why it isn't sending you a gpgram on Sundays I think not enough lines yet to trigger it
pete_dushenski: i'd suggest leaving it. it's easier to remember as-is
shinohai: guess I could change command to mimi or something, whatever works
shinohai: ben_vulpes: I took the liberty of linking to mimi from jhvh1 so one can quickly get page link to specified block
ben_vulpes: 'daddy blogger' i r not.
ben_vulpes: you know, i'm not particularly inclined to put the kids face on my website.
a111: Logged on 2016-10-05 01:05 shinohai: I think pete_dushenski mentioned it, don't quote me on that though.
mircea_popescu: i believe.
shinohai: I love the bitch, even when she is cruel
mircea_popescu: i dunno. it can be or not depending what you're after.
mircea_popescu: lobbes can't say i didn't try.
mircea_popescu: i dunno how to make it simpler than that, so there it is.
adlai: what exactly is vomit? please, point out.... or don't. i'm sitting out of this 'argument', have fun.
mircea_popescu: i dunno how you manage to come back to the same vomit. but it is vomit.
adlai: ok ok ok, the issue was thestringpuller's ambiguous use of "rubble", i assumed he meant the coins themselves, you're interpreting it as the 'innovations'. w/e. it's impossible to 'destroy' coins through layers such as p2sh, segwit, drivechain, etc; it just makes coins less tightly controlled, and more dependent on miner goodwill
adlai: mircea_popescu: dude there is tons of 'cut stone' here. i don't expect you to visit the non-WoT p2sh.info, but i'll tl;dr for you: there are currently just over 1.8 million btc secured by the goodwill of miners, and a nested ripemd160(sha256(x)) collision
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i won't be touching this one, not for a long while. got full hands.
PeterL: yeah, I know how bad it is
PeterL: I guess I deserve it for going to junk-food (heavy on the junk) places ☟︎
PeterL: <rant> I hate these single spigot fountain beverage dispensers popping up in all the fast-food places (whoopty-doo you can have 1001 flavor combinations, I just want Coke!) so many flavors to choose from, but none of them come out right </rant>
shinohai: ah ben_vulpes ... today it works for me! I blame a previously unknown debian gremlin
trinque: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-05#1553270 << I would buy an in-WoT RNG yesterday. ☝︎☟︎
a111: Logged on 2016-10-05 17:05 adlai: sure, but there are two kinds of "unwind" here and i'm not sure which you mean. one is roughly "i will not honor a confirmed bitcoin transaction which has inputs coming from a prevout that looked like [op_hash160 <data> op_equal]", whereas the other is "no miner will honor a block containing any such transaction". the former is easy, the latter requires miner collaboration
thestringpuller: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-05#1553284 << i wonder if in the future, when the earthquake hits all this "layered innovation", if there will be business in salvaging the rubble (i.e. that spend-all NOOP shit miners are to view as 5 wheel solution) ☝︎
ben_vulpes: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-05#1553085 << looks fine to me, but nevertheless i'm not interested in fighting browsers over table rendering. ☝︎
ben_vulpes: "addresses" are a murky thing, i've discovered.
mircea_popescu: if history is any guide, i manage to gather miner support to quash "internet entrepreneurs" of the vc-aspirant variety a whole of a lot more often than the converse.
adlai: sure, but there are two kinds of "unwind" here and i'm not sure which you mean. one is roughly "i will not honor a confirmed bitcoin transaction which has inputs coming from a prevout that looked like [op_hash160 <data> op_equal]", whereas the other is "no miner will honor a block containing any such transaction". the former is easy, the latter requires miner collaboration ☟︎
mircea_popescu: and in general - "innovation" on top of bitcoin is extremely risky an endeavour. the item itself is the heart of reaction ; and the notion that "nobody would dare" unwind the "developments" of usg.tards runs into the plain statement that i certainly will.
a111: Logged on 2016-10-05 14:09 mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-10-05#1553189 << read what was being said. i do not discuss the matter in outside terms. should WE stop allowing 3-lead addresses, all coins found there will be gone.