79000+ entries in 0.577s

mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes
i suspect it's more of the same "
i want to want something
i can't get because
i want to want". horses and dogs more accessible, but horses are very much a showoff thing and dogs well... the afficionados tend to keep it quiet and get rammed often.
ben_vulpes: mircea_popescu: tastes great with "
i just want to be a mermaid"
mircea_popescu: or wait, the dolphins are no longer fashionable
i guess ? what is it now, whales ? or too shitlordy ?
ben_vulpes: relatedly, there are interesting fault lines at work in the left: anti-sex activists masquerading as feminists (see the CoC mentioning "sexualized language") vs the rad-fems who are cooking a whole pile of wtf for the left's pet "feminists" on the topic of "but
i love cock and babies and mothering and what precisely is wrong with that and no you chicks with dicks can't come to my moon party"
ben_vulpes: heh, today
i learned the unitards are so fully vested in the anti-sex brigade that U+1F346 or ðif my client doesn't mangle it, goes by the name of /aubergine/
☟︎☟︎☟︎ ben_vulpes: that said,
i occasionally check my logs for reorgs and have yet to see one
a111: Logged on 2016-12-03 23:21 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform in re
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-06#1515745 << we've completed tests and confirmed we can actually link ada code.
i'm thinking, prolly the best way is to make an official and definitive tmsr-rsa ~in ada~ as a v root ? or hows's your general numeric thing coming along and more importantly what's it written in ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform in re
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-06#1515745 << we've completed tests and confirmed we can actually link ada code.
i'm thinking, prolly the best way is to make an official and definitive tmsr-rsa ~in ada~ as a v root ? or hows's your general numeric thing coming along and more importantly what's it written in ?
☝︎☟︎ mircea_popescu:
i dun think there's anything in the mozilla tree that's rescuable.
nick_name:
i want to optimize searching algoritm.
mircea_popescu:
i mean, the turks fucking had an idle class of ethnic greeks living in fanar for 3+ centuries, exactly mappable to any modern understanding of bureaucracy. nevertheless.
mats:
i dunno why you feel this way about your talents
mats:
i got the option of fleeing to .cn, this fantastical train of thought isn't really for my benefit
mats:
i almost forgot about alf's fatalism
mats:
i don't, and
i'm still struggling with the idea of abandoning everything and everyone
i know to an uncertain fate
mats: (no,
i'm not familiar with why jews didn't move there)
mats:
i picture the fund covering the cost of pilot, plane, fuel, hasty emergency runway construction, and minimal perimeter security
a111: Logged on 2016-12-03 20:21 mats:
i was thinking the americans in #t should pool an emergency airlift fund
trinque: eh
I'm curious where Texas ends up, gonna stay right here.
mats:
i dunno what that means
mircea_popescu: why, to encourage the "
i just wanted" folk to rely on it ?
mats:
i was thinking the americans in #t should pool an emergency airlift fund
☟︎ mircea_popescu: their idea
i mean. "allow humans who give a shit to signal this to the network ; and allow their txn go first"
mircea_popescu: there are teams with better history, because linux or whatever.
i wouldn't however bet on the theory there are better teams altogether. and no, "secret meta-nsa" doesn't get to dent this discussion. because clinton lost.
shinohai:
I know of no other chan with such useful bots as this one has.
shinohai: To quote mircea_popescu " the irc festivities are moving over to #trilema ; with a more selective lordship list and improved tools all around. "
I think the improved tools have indeed materialized.
thestringpuller: UK "banned" end to end encryption with Investigory Powers Act of 2016.
I think it basically says companies in UK have to put back doors in their shit or they are "non-compliant", thus making end-2-end encryption illegal. Effects Blockchain.info users (who operates in UK). Takes effect 2017...
mircea_popescu: kinda gives a useful estimation of the total value of the whole rest of the ecosystem,
i guess.
mircea_popescu: but
i lolled at the dry "a very long depreciation schedule, possibly inexcess of five years".
mod6: so, thanks for all your efforts.
i appreciate it.
mod6: fair enough,
i can just throw in another
i suppose.
mod6: ah, shit.
i guess
i agree. maybe
I should have put a line in the top of that thing.
mod6: and we've seen how close the rsacalypse.
i feel like we were right there a few months back.
mod6:
I like what it does, and it seems to make sense in the case where
I might need this one single time. To prevent against cryptographic death,
I can generate this key pair, sign it with my PGP key, and then send a one time message of my new PGP key fp to save me from hitting the ground.
mod6: since it's confession time:
I read asciilifeform's post probably 5 times total. Following through all of the steps at least 2x to get the hang of what was going on there, and reviewing the code.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you mean, "if
i find aes collision,
i can replace signed text with (longer) signed text" ?
mircea_popescu: it's no criticism whatsoever, it's confession.
i'm working on it.
mircea_popescu: mod6
i confess
i've not gotten my head altogether around the lamport thing.
mod6:
i beleive that mentally, when you read a rating, you grok this text on some level, which invokes some type of response.
i can be ignored, sure, but it happened never the less.
mod6:
i agree, but it tends to happen. that still doesn't take away that my rating is ~not~ a guarantee of anything.
mircea_popescu: yeah, there's gonna be a bit of overlap/restating agreement as
i go through the whole pile. sorry bout the department of redundancy department.
mod6: Yah, and then should
I need it,
I can use the lamport priv key to send a message "hey, it's mod6. my new pgpkey fp is: ABCDEF1234567890..."
a111: Logged on 2016-12-03 03:38 mircea_popescu:
i think actually he was perfectly satisfied with what we arrived at.
mod6:
I should clearsign the pubkey with my pgp-pubkey and deedbot this, aha?
mod6: So, changing subjects for a minute...
I have these lamport battle-ready pub/priv keys made.
mod6:
i thought also that
i remembered some guy who tried to hijack your nick or something.
mod6:
I agree there too. When you sign a vpatch, you're saying, "
I, have read (or wrote) this, and
I place my seal upon it as it is correct and right." Not, "mod6 wrote this thing,
I rate him a '+1 Cool Guy' for effort."
mod6: should
I be hung up by my heels for that?
mod6: it's even happened to me.
i rated a guy with positive rating, he didn't scam me at all. but he apparently scammed some other people.
mircea_popescu:
i think actually he was perfectly satisfied with what we arrived at.
☟︎ mod6:
i get trinque's worry; that he'll wake up and find his wallet emptied out; and he wants a pill against that. the preposed solution is fine for that. but signed ratings is not the answer imho.
mircea_popescu: and ironically
i can give a negative evaluation in spite of my positive rating - other lady friend asks me about having kids with the guy -
i'll tell her about daugther ; and if the daughter's not a total futz, if her drinking friend asks about dad he'll get a + notwithstanding he's an asshole. or maybe won't, depending on how much of an asshole he is generally. but there's the ambiguity.
mircea_popescu: the wot isn't a computable graph.
i mean it's drawable, obviously, and the drawing's not futile, but just because the machine can draw it dun mean the machine grasps it.
mircea_popescu: mod6 not only that, but there's a lot of flexibility required in actual human intercourse. "x is a great drunk and a miserable father, so has - from daughter and + from me.
i'm friends with the daughter and we fuck occasionally. problem ?"
a111: Logged on 2016-12-02 20:57 trinque: if my dead grandfather hated someone,
I would most certainly care about that given that he was a man
I respected.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> and herein included - all my ratings. you can not at some point come and say "X scammed me of a btc and you had him rated +1 therefore you owe me some cents" << while reading, this is what
I was thinking too. We've seen many times where someone reputable has a positive rating for X, and then later X scams out. These ratings can't act as a guarantee; which would place the rater in some leg
a111: Logged on 2016-08-18 12:32 mircea_popescu: asciilifeform since we're on this btw, the way
i want tmsr-rsa key generation to work is as follows : a contains a number of entropy bytes specified by user in tmsr-rsa.conf read whenever tmsr-rsa.conf specifies (such as urandom); b contains a base-tmsr string specified by user. c = base-tmsr(a).b ; p = nextprime(cut(sha512(c),257)) ; process is repeated for q = nextprime (cut(sha512(c'),258));
a111: Logged on 2016-12-02 20:35 danielpbarron: so
i assumed people would still have to resister their actual key with the bot prior to getting their eulora account
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-12-02#1576658 << the way
i intend THAT to work is that client connects to server, by sending encrypted magic packet which includes its fp ; if server has that fp it sends challenge string and logs in the player ; if server has not that fp it sends challenge string and proceeds ot character creation. nice and streamlined.
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2016-12-02 20:35 danielpbarron:
i mean
i'm not gonna put my key on a networked machine
phf:
i checked b-a log because somebody mentioned activity, a few weeks ago and it's literally the same conversation.
i remember he tried directly intervening, "warning" cockli guy
i think, and cockli's reaction was "you seem like a crazy dude with an agenda", but
i guess a strategy of "mpex is long gong and nobody heard from mp" probably works better
scriba: n o p q r s t u v w x y z 7 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 8 a b c d e f g h
i j k l
scriba: Logged on 2016-12-03: [01:54:50] <phf> ACTION 0 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 2 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 3 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 4 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 5 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 6 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m
phf 0 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 1 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 2 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 3 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 4 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 5 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 6 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 7 a b c d e f g h
i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 8 a b c d e f g h
i j k l