78900+ entries in 0.047s

mod6: i'm just saying, doing it 'botless'. like I say, "this auction is open for 72 hours, closes on X date at X
time. Selling 1 BTC for USD. Winner of auction sends whatever wires seller specifies."
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-08-31 15:55 BingoBoingo: lobbes: Looks from here like you are good
to go
a111: Logged on 2018-07-09 22:25 mircea_popescu:
the correct solution is
to distinguish selling and buying auctions. change
the "A#285" lede into either "B#285" or "S#285" and
then if it's a S have it work as it works now, but if it's a B have it work ~reverse~, so smaller bids overbid larger bids.
mod6: We could do some sort of open outcry auction in here. Where Pizarro auctions off 1 BTC, and
the winner send funds
to specified destinations.
mod6: as soon as I have one, I'll be sending out
the invoices immediately.
mod6: trinque: yeah, not sure how
that'd work. i'd like
to see more price points. but if we can't receive dollars bought,
then I dunno.
mircea_popescu: trinque i
think you have
to do it ; reverse auction still not
there.
trinque: hey mod6, when's
the next auction?
BingoBoingo: lol, I just can't believe
this chicken I've never met cheated my out of
the good stuff
mod6: don't choke your chicken
too hard
mod6: jurov: how's it going with
the move of
the ML?
BingoBoingo: So I'm putting
together my healthy 4 egg veggie scramble, and one of
the eggs didn't have a yolk
mircea_popescu: can prolly even bury stuff along
the lines. nobody will ever fucking find.
mircea_popescu: energy abundantly available well before you get
that close.
mircea_popescu: that's what i was going
to say, you don't have
to get
THAT close. if air is no longer dielectric you're
too close.
mircea_popescu: but yes, judging by how ubiquitous "computer mouse
thrown over power lines" are in urban environment (when it's not sneakers, at any rate) might be very practical approach -- put
the inductive coil in
the mouse cable ; and
the
transmitter in
the body.
mircea_popescu: certainly
this counts as qualification for lab physicist. many ways available
to introduce systematic errors.
mircea_popescu: and by reporting it "live" as it were, solve all
the data integrity problems etc.
mircea_popescu: in field use ; for research, something
that records voltages i guess
a111: Logged on 2018-08-16 18:18 asciilifeform: in other noose, asciilifeform obtained and
testing a LTC3108 , 'energy harvester',
they've become cheapo
mircea_popescu: "day and nigth power output of solar panel
throughout
the year is here : ; observe
the full moon on y and
the blood moon on z" and so fucking on.
mircea_popescu: well yeah ; it doesn't include hwatever sbin setting you were discussing
though. i guess leave as a comment.
hanbot: yes, am connected
thusly atm.
mircea_popescu: i suppose putting
together a standard ircing recipe can't hurt anything
mod6: asciilifeform is our resident expert on
these matters; are we still ok
to let users run znc (at least for now)?
mod6: In your blog, you point out
that you are using xchat. For me, since I use irssi (this might be helpful
to others on
the shared-environemt), it could be started up in a screen session, and simply ssh in attach your screen (or
tmux?)
to irc.
mod6: Regardless, we
trust you
to set it up and manage it -- It may be reasonable
to find an alternative if one comes around
that's suitble.
mod6: Hi, I've always stayed clear of znc, so have never used it myself. Let me
take a look at what asciilifeform said above.
mimisbrunnr: Logged on 2018-08-30 00:31 hanbot: q for
the management --can i set up znc on UY3?
mod6: Hi diana_coman!
Thank you for your feedback.
diana_coman: mod6, as pizarro customer on a year-long contract I can confirm I do *not want* anything
to be done; one upside of going longterm is precisely
that it's set for some
time and it doesn't require any additional ongoing attention essentially
mod6: I
think I just needed some setting straight. I appreciate
that.
mircea_popescu: as i'm 100% certain i'd have rejected a bill with
the heading "see mp, it's more expensive nao
than when we shook hands", i'm correspondingly 100% certain i don't care what happened. cuz
that's why i'd have rejected it, "i don't care what happened".
mod6: Well with
that, I'm glad I brought
this up in here.
The guidence is going
to be: Pizarro won't do anything at
this
time for existing contracts. Upon renewal, you'll pay
the posted price.
mircea_popescu: people who don't want long
term contracts, ie don't want
the fx risk, don't get long
term contracts. it's
that simple really.
mircea_popescu: for
the other fucking
thing -- suppose
the price went
the OTHER way. what, you're gonna hit everyone with pesky small extra bills ?
trinque: than over w/e beer money on
the shared hosting
☟︎ trinque: speaking for myself, I'm gonna be way crankier if I've got 0.3BTC of hardware down
there
that's suddenly homeless
mod6: Fair point, I just didn't want
to judge if how much someones money is worth
to
them outright.
mircea_popescu: it seriously can not be worth your
time,
this. i mean we're
talking 0.001 or something ? 'cmon.
mod6: trinque:
Thank you, fair enough.
trinque: and
then yeah, go get some ads up or something much more important
trinque: if you're
trying
to guard reputation, all you need
to do is communicate clearly about
the mechanism, and be done with it.
mircea_popescu: you seriously can't be sitting
there spending hours on
this pennies
thing.
☟︎ mod6: I can see
that
too, Sir. I just wanna make sure we're doing
the Right
Thing (tm).
mircea_popescu: people sign up for what
they sign up for ; if
that changes it's one
thing
to give
them
the more favourable price going forward ; but you can't do
this retroactive
thing ?
mircea_popescu: the only
thing it does is make accounting overexpensive.
mircea_popescu: mod6 i really wouldn't bother ; prices can fluctuate, it's
the nature of
the beast, what are youi going
to do, liquify all contracts and keep
track of back and forth movements ? it's insanity.
mod6: This one was setup on May 3rd, and goes
through
the end of 2018.
mod6: mircea_popescu, for instance is paying for one of
these for Mocky.
mod6: Initially, I
thought
this was
the right approach. But also could see
that maybe,
this wasn't square enough for longer dated contracts. However,
this sets a bad precedent of reprincing active contracts if pricing or circumstances change.