log☇︎
639400+ entries in 0.399s
BlueMeanie4: if you have enough gold. these people didnt each have enough gold to buy a house, but collectively they had the skills to make houses
BingoBoingo: <BlueMeanie4> but the money and debt allowed them to be specialists << Fraternities at universities do this without the debt. With beer, a good, they manage to trade the good for pledge's dignity.
decimation: you think I could buy a house for some gold?
BlueMeanie4: decimation- try building your own house then
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 okay, how would the proof that what i say is actually correct and your view mistaken look to you ?
BlueMeanie4: its similar with mortgages, requires capital to get all the specialists together to make a house
decimation: none of this required debt to operate
BlueMeanie4: where there was once no houses, or even individual ability to create houses, there was not a usable house
BlueMeanie4: but the money and debt allowed them to be specialists
BlueMeanie4: of course they had to work
BlueMeanie4: sure it is, I met these people
bats_cd03: lol not an expert. anyway, i speculate: it could be a combination of due diligence combined with the USG trying to acquire as much btc as possible, theretofore held by citizens not entirely faithful to the fiat gods (e.g. tax evasion, other 'illegal' activities)
mircea_popescu: this notion that everyone's entitled to sexual release gotta go.
asciilifeform: decimation: yes. that's actual 'party doctrine', believe it or not
mircea_popescu: decimation no, they're saying that the betas should be better betas already. i agree with the sentiment.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform suspects we're being trolled << It seems many of the danielpbarron invites elicit this reaction
mircea_popescu: hey. it seems it'll take a while until this problem will be operationalized enough to be acceptable.
BlueMeanie4: then they had houses
decimation: asciilifeform: I don't get the liber-tards argument, are they saying that women ought to be able to slut at the sluttiest parties without attracting unwanted male attention?
BlueMeanie4: well the people didnt have houses before
mircea_popescu: but if it does a lot of it it ends up like the us.
mircea_popescu: now, a little empoverishing itself for the sake of stroking its impatience may be okay
BlueMeanie4: no thats not at all correct
mircea_popescu: looky : the mortgages make society poorer not wealthier.
BlueMeanie4: this money system allowed them all to have nice houses in belgium
BlueMeanie4: and they loaned it to each other to do jobs on eachothers houses
BlueMeanie4: and they made their own money system, a local currency
BlueMeanie4: i was in Belgium for a while and there was a group of people out in the country side
BingoBoingo: bats_cd03: Any thoughts on how the USG encounter I had, you're closest we have to an expert that I know of
decimation: BlueMeanie4: do you think a finite supply of money is sufficient?
asciilifeform suspects we're being trolled
bats_cd03: when asked about 'creating wealth', i usually think 'creating energy'. can it be done?
mircea_popescu: you don't create new wealth by creating new obligations or else a law that'd enact the obligation of pigs to fly would make us all rich.
decimation: “But I think we need to think critically about why we keep placing the responsibility for preventing sexual assault on young women.”
asciilifeform: like this answer ?
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 he's inquiring if you're trying to create or redistribute value.
bats_cd03: work on generating 100 btc in wealth first, mate. then go for 10.000.
mircea_popescu: since then, the marketshare of all exchanges together dropped monotonously.
asciilifeform: hate to borrow from herr clinton, but what does 'generate' mean here ?
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 you know, three years ago half of all btc trade happened on otc. 90% ish of the rest was on mtgox.
mircea_popescu: most everyone else does not want to say.
mircea_popescu: i am blazing new ground here with the very public display of contracts, as for instance seen earlier
asciilifeform: BlueMeanie4: is your (or mine) inability to answer this question with a definitive number (x kg, y usd, etc.) a 'problem' ?
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 it's an otc market. you don't get to know anything the participants don't choose to share.
asciilifeform: BlueMeanie4: how many contracts for the purchase of, e.g, gallium, were written today?
BlueMeanie4: youre loling and were there any contracts written today?
BlueMeanie4: as in- determine them
BlueMeanie4: what is needed is a way to quickly INTERROGATE the contracts
mircea_popescu: didn't we go over all of this yest or w/e ?
BlueMeanie4: you cant have highly liquid markets this way
mircea_popescu: it's so fuckng biased we have a wot to deal with the bias hierarchy
BlueMeanie4: so there is ZERO sense of non-bias in your system
BlueMeanie4: oh so the cp has the ability to choose?
mircea_popescu: what's the five miliseconds earliness bought the early bird ?
mircea_popescu: so fifty people want to accept the same contract, and mp says yes and the cp picks mp because hey, he'd rather have mp's cp risk.
mircea_popescu: well yes great but this effect dwarves your problem by degrees of magnitude.
BingoBoingo: BlueMeanie4: Don't worry too much about this distinct IRC phenomenon where the channel carries on as many simultaneous conversations as the participants allow.
mircea_popescu: and rightfully so. because to the trustworthy goes the business.
BlueMeanie4: well im not opposed to WOT
mircea_popescu: parties will have this ability ANYWAY
mircea_popescu: looky here : because wot users are identified, and their reputation forms a market hierarchy
BlueMeanie4: this is a big problem. this leads to market bias.
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 no, and what's worse i don't see a way to translate your formulation of what's a problem in fiat marketplaces into ap roblem here.
asciilifeform: let's assume that superman flies in before anyone and 'takes or leaves.' how is it a problem ?
BlueMeanie4: do you accept that this is a problem?
BlueMeanie4: and the other actors then got 'sloppy seconds'
BlueMeanie4: what would happen if one party had the unique ability to either take or leave EVERY contract that was submitted globally?
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 you'll have to at least build a theoretical model showing how this attack'd work. kinda how it's done.
gribble: WARNING: Currently not authenticated. Trust relationship from user assbot to user deego: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 1 via 1 connections. Graph: http://b-otc.com/stg?source=assbot&dest=deego | WoT data: http://b-otc.com/vrd?nick=deego | Rated since: Tue Jun 19 02:22:41 2012
BingoBoingo: BlueMeanie4> i dont know << When's the last time you used your Apple II for a modern task?
asciilifeform digs in archive for the little story about the wall street 'hft' folks who omit all (!) crypto because 'speed.' ☟︎
BlueMeanie4: because no where do you even indicate that this is a problem
asciilifeform: 'pardon my cynical twist, but what are you doing with that 20,000×20,000 double-precision floating point matrix you say you need to invert _today_? If you answer "nutt'n, I jus kinda wondered what it'd be like, you know", you should be very happy that I am most likely more than 3000 miles away from you, or I would come over and slap you hard.' ☟︎☟︎☟︎☟︎
BlueMeanie4: your system seems pretty naive in this regard
BlueMeanie4: i already mentioned it, you can bias the markets by exploiting time responses
mircea_popescu: so what peculiarities would thus become exposed ?
mircea_popescu: so then why are you talking about it lol
mircea_popescu: BlueMeanie4 what's your idea of "serious trafic" ?
BingoBoingo: Ah, Imma Mac SE/30 kind of person. There are "now" slow machines, yes
nubbins`: what's the trilema article about how irc works
BlueMeanie4: you better believe if any serious traffic were to happen on this system they would exploit the peculiarities of IRC
BlueMeanie4: if i can exploit, and it makes me a dollar or two, i will
mircea_popescu: why is this a problem ?
BingoBoingo: I know what the good is worth and I bid up to what I am willing to pay.
BlueMeanie4: so the problem is in these sorts of systems is people will push the time limits as far as they will go every time
BingoBoingo: Depends on the good. When I'm buying generally the one that wins comes early.
BlueMeanie4: in the last few minutes
BlueMeanie4: and when do 95% of the bids come in on an auction?
nubbins`: have in the past, yep
mircea_popescu: you'll have to sit down and confront the twinheaded fact that a) before you can improve on something you have to gain good familiariy with it and b) that the temptation to just make as a cheap substitute for understanding is sinful.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: what fascinates me is how many people whine about 'slow' without saying precisely why they want 'fast', and while remaining entirely innocent of basic kindergarten-level gotchas like 'lamport's clock'
mircea_popescu: <BlueMeanie4> this is also a problem with Bitcoin, and thats why Counterparty cant be used for anything serious << this high speed thing is an unresolved problem in many ways.
BingoBoingo: A private assignment of anything should never have the wires be the limiting factor in its speed of execution, other things will slow it first.
asciilifeform: BlueMeanie4: 'usability' << we're using it. and it appears - you are, too. so what kind of 'usability' is lacking ?
BingoBoingo: Contracts available for trading publicly need a centralized exchange. Private contracts need negotiation et al.
nubbins`: there's a dick surgery song about this very thing
nubbins`: the details are in the pudding
BlueMeanie4: does anyone use this thing
BlueMeanie4: proof is in the pudding
BingoBoingo: BlueMeanie4: I think a problem is you are confusing particular contracts and contracts in general