43300+ entries in 0.312s

mircea_popescu: so no, at no fucking point does any patch have anything other than
a single parent, which is properly speaking "the previous press", rather than "
a random collection of files scattered about". like it or not, files don't have the sort of semantic power whereby
a db.cpp "of the right hash" will always be useful when imported into some random project. files are not contextless ; neither because they aren't currently tooled to b
mircea_popescu: if instead of this we look at the other kind of "two parents", whereby ch3 supposedly has both ch2 and mpi_fix_copy as parents, this is specifically the situation discussed by the problem
A : that two patches, which ARE STILL IN
A CHAIN, nevertheless happen to touch disjunct filesets, and so the question of their order is open (which phf renders "correctly" in the sense of acceptably as he does ; but which is NOT meaningful i
mircea_popescu: second off, this approach where you take some vague fragment of what was said, respin it into some bit of nonsense meaningful to some random other interest in your own head and proceed as if that's what's said is not
a game anyone in my experience willingly entertained.
mircea_popescu: there's
a very strict limit on the complexity of any discussion (which -- correlates to its utility) imposed by the propensity of bad actor to inject nonsense in the conversation.
a111: Logged on 2016-12-23 19:53 asciilifeform: if i had any reason to think that turning v tree into
a forest of vertical stakes , exponentially crowded with IDENTICAL payloads that cannot be machine-compared , would make it easier to tell friend from foe and wisdom from folly -- i would agree with mircea_popescu's algo. but i do not.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-06 04:29 mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-05#1765580 << eh get the hell out of here, so you want someone to take that patch and put it into some random other tree which happens to have
a db.cpp that matches its hash ? this is insanity on the level of early organ transplantation experiments.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 23:40 asciilifeform: think, if EVERY patch requires global regrind of all of world history, you ain't using v, may as well throw out all of the unnecessary equipment -- you're passing
a monolithic turd around
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-05#1765580 << eh get the hell out of here, so you want someone to take that patch and put it into some random other tree which happens to have
a db.cpp that matches its hash ? this is insanity on the level of early organ transplantation experiments.
☝︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: through some discussion it emerged that
A.1 and
A.2 are not practically distinct, one just provides the memory for the implementation fo the other as
a foremost feature.
mircea_popescu: problem
A has two possible legitimate answers :
A.1 : introduce
a further parentage chain (so patch does not discuss merely file hashes but also somehow
a hash of prev patch) and
A.2 : introduce
a magic file which must (by protocol) be touched by all patches.
mircea_popescu: problem S will not be considered ; problem X is resolved by answering yes. because god fucking help you, if your patch has two antecedents you are
a heretic anathema.
mircea_popescu: 1. problem S (alf's) is entirely spurious and not part of this confersation, go talk to dreamweaver about it ; 2. problem
A (trinque's) : "if two patches with same antecedent touch disjunct filesets, how does establish which came first" ; 3. problem X ( ben_vulpes 's) : "if i totally sabotage v into
a piece of shit entirely contrary to its everything, will you hit me in the head ?"
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 23:24 ben_vulpes: or to put it
a different way, that one *must* create an invalid state in order to patch atop two divergent patches.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 20:26 asciilifeform: '... stack-based overflow in the function EkCheckCurrentCert. This function is called from TPM2_CreatePrimary with user controlled data -
a DER encoded [6] endorsement key (EK) certificate stored in the NV storage....'
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 19:22 asciilifeform: trinque: i'd bet d00d has spells of sobriety, he has afaik already outlived the expected life of
a serious meth aficionado
mircea_popescu: yeah seriously. failure of the esl mind is mostly ensured by
a very broken evaluation of "success". take the brick in hand, enough achievement for the first day is to have managed to fucking hold it. yes, it's completely opaque to you. so what if it is. so are many things. see what can be cracked out of it ; there's no shortage of "science fiction" "magical realism" whatever in the actual world once one's you know, no longer
mircea_popescu: "did it not ever occur to you to get
a week's supply ahead of time ?" "here's
a $20 check"
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-05#1765278 << teitelbaum gaon sez, excessive virtue still vicious. nothing wrong with
a little of whatever now and again, i for that matter drink the occasional cup of coffee and so on. the problem's when it becomes
a regular thing, "i am in X circumstance therefore must Y".
☝︎ mircea_popescu: in
a sense of nn whittled down to mean "here's this 1T bayesian array"
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform nah nah, was some other kid, had
a whole pile of "nsa recognizes you for your not having done any work in x field" certs and whatnot.
a111: Logged on 2017-11-25 00:24 gabriel_laddel: 1000x magnification seems unrealistic - that being said: if I crush some product, take hundreds of images of each sample & use them as input into
a neural network along with
a 1-10 (bunk-absolute fire) rating y'think it'll get trained to recognize the real deal?
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 19:16 gabriel_laddel: training
a NN on FG output to see if it trains faster so I can sell them
a111: Logged on 2018-01-06 02:46 asciilifeform: if you have
a record of all the prev shots, it is trivial to avoid recurring ( use simple counter )
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 18:54 asciilifeform: ( whynot, is not
a bad question, it reduces to the absence of
a solution to the tednelson problem -- how to point into
a structure unambiguously, other than by line # )
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-05#1765140 << could trivially point into structure by word count! which is how it was fucking done before you darned kids started skatin' on the sidewalk! my addressing into classical text is paragraph count / word offset. what the FUCK is
a line!
☝︎ a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 18:29 asciilifeform: ( make
a string out of /dev/random crapola + current epoch time, say )
a111: Logged on 2018-01-05 18:28 asciilifeform: no good. first of all suppose there are 2 concurrent runs of the vtron ( say this is
a cuntoo pressing itself )
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-05#1765028 << lmao this guy. YOU PUT IT THERE! and moreover... what is the logic of "begins to suspect that ~nobody actually read ch5" when "it survived nearly
a week of asciilifeform rereading whole thing every day." ? DID YOU NOT READ IT ?
☝︎ esthlos: hmm...is there
a way for reflow not to break diff...
mircea_popescu: contrary to what pantsuit may be whispering in ear, "here i am, with this 10lb book of which i can read not
a word" is
a very poor predictor of failure.
a111: Logged on 2018-01-04 17:11 mircea_popescu: they had all sorts of (utterly nonsensical) "cars of the future", their features being that they were "warlike" (in
a dysfunctional, anti-mechanicistic, looks-are-everything-and-hot-beats-cute girl pov) and that they had mechanisms exposed
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform there's
a place where he was integrated into the borg, but it's
a dubious weld.
mircea_popescu: absolute ban on english as an avenue to this much in the same way absolute ban to barking as an avenue to opera. i don't care if you're
a dog and i don't care if barking comes naturally to you
a111: Logged on 2018-01-06 00:00 asciilifeform: i'ma summarize the v thing : if you have
a proposed new v algo ; and it would turn my 1kB patches into 1MB, and my readable 3 lines into 100kLoc of ?#@%$*(@%% , and my trivial machine-diff-verifiable changes into 'why dontcha sit for 5 years doing eyeball-powered diff' -- it is NOT an improvement. and i won't touch it. sign it. sign anything made on it. etc
trinque: I proposed two schemes to better model it, and actually like the second better. one was including the entire concatenation's hash in
a vpatch. the second was being able to name arbitrary antecedent files without the requirement that diff material follows
trinque: this is nonsense. people can choose any prior state whatsoever as basis for
a new patch.
ben_vulpes: but this is the magic political speshul case of
a patch that ties together other patches for the political object that is
a release!
trinque: second, does my memory deceive or did the thing end up with
a comment in an *unrelated file*
trinque: hasn't yet been any reason someone benefits by having your edit to maxlocks but having done something batshit to say,
a file db.cpp depends upon
trinque: we come to
a deep political disagreement there
ben_vulpes: the point that trinque is making is that you can change other files in such
a way that ruins maxint_locks
trinque: I do not need to edit the fucking thing to depend on
a particular state of it
trinque: you do not see how it's fundamentally retarded to consider db.cpp
a distinct thing, rather than the scroll "trb" as the *thing*
trinque: patch A1 and A2 are peers, happened to different files with same starting codebase state. you proposed writing
a B that encompases whatever changes plus the bodies of A1 and A2.
ben_vulpes: or to put it
a different way, that one *must* create an invalid state in order to patch atop two divergent patches.
☟︎ ben_vulpes: what irks me about this is that one can make
a patch that depends on
a state of the codebase that is not
a valid press.
trinque: you edit db.cpp. I edit main.cpp. how does someone now use both of those pieces of work in
a 3rd patch.
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2017-12-27 04:52 mircea_popescu: trinque because it'll get
a mess ; ben_vulpes it's just
a counter. increments 1 from prev line. shall i do
a sample pastebin ?