800+ entries in 0.001s

mp_en_viaje: so you got a perfect in, don't even need whaack 's proverbial gift basket. just go knocking on doors explain what you're
 tying
 to do, organize a fiber club
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-10 12:39:58 mp_en_viaje: from experience
 the best way
 these
 things go is if a large-ish group of landowners around a geographically reasonable node point ask
 them for it. maybe see if your neighbours wanna join ?
 mp_en_viaje: from experience
 the best way
 these
 things go is if a large-ish group of landowners around a geographically reasonable node point ask
 them for it. maybe see if your neighbours wanna join ?
 billymg: i
 then followed up with one of
 their
 technicians who visited
 the property and he said it was doable and we just need
 to go
 through
 the RFP / proposal process
 billymg: so will be at my expense. whaack
 talked
 to one of
 their customer support agents who didn't really know what it would cost but
 thought roughly $2-5k for
 the laying of
 the cable
 billymg: (i need
 to get on my lawyer here about filling out
 the RFP)
 billymg: they are willing
 to put
 together a proposal for doing so
 billymg: yeah, compared
 to
 the ~$375 / mo for Kolbi's enterprise fiber offering it seemed like a good deal
 ossabot: (trilema-hanbot) 2020-03-03 billymg: 
http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema-hanbot/2020-02-08#1001053 << update: my girl has been corresponding with american data
 through
 this contact and
 they are now putting
 together a proposal for a supposedly dedicated 10/10 connection at $150 a month (proposal will be
 to determine cost/timeline of install)
  ossabot: (ossasepia) 2020-03-09 diana_coman: ftr re clock, my scripts don't bother with "end of
 task" -
 there's no end
 to anything, only start of next
 thing whether
 that's break or whatever; since
 time is spent anyway,
 the start of a new
 thing is by definition
 the end of
 the previous.
 mp_en_viaje: billymg,
 talk
 to hanbot, she found some pretty cool radio people
 that sold me a backup
 thing really fucking solid.
 billymg will bbl - irl chores for
 the day
 ossabot: (ossasepia) 2020-03-09 diana_coman: spyked: well, no boost dep is certainly a gain; and yeah, I'm sure
 that
 the earlier
 the version
 the less of a monster it is;
 that being said, I'm either really getting old or something but I can hardly see
 the point of >10k LOC for what can be done precisely as wanted
 through <1k lines of cmd line
 tools, huh.
 billymg: i've got a
 temporary internet solution now as well (cellular LTE via Movistar) as we work on getting
 the real
 thing
 mp_en_viaje is checking out what's so great bout
 them o logs!
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-09 22:57:45 lobbes: Also, are you good for
 tomorrow night or were you looking for doing
 this during
 the day? I'm slaving in
 the mines
 tomorrow but my night is clear. If need be I may be able
 to weasel a work-from-home day
 though, so I'll check back when I wake up
 tomorrow
 ericbot: Logged on 2019-12-04 04:37:32 mircea_popescu: lobbes wtf dude, you set ALL of
 these
 to 2019-12-03 22:03:06
 time ?! didn't we go
 through an entire discussion of how it should increase monotonically ? gah.
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-09 22:57:28 lobbes: mp_en_viaje: In preparation of our next attempt at getting
 this project done, I've been going
 through my 
faff-fest from last
 time.. and
 trying
 to figure out how we should pick back up
  mp_en_viaje: if
 this isn't what it does, i suspect i might deeply misunderstand wtf it actually does.
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-09 22:26:10 jfw: mp_en_viaje: do you have a specific goal in mind for
 Thursday's wallet work? Do you also want
 to use
 the online part (I would imagine so but could
 technically be done without)? If so, note
 that it
 takes about a day
 to scan
 the present blockchain once fed
 the address(es) of interest, and requires a
 TRB node. If you wish
 to also send
 the rawtx using it, as would be most proper, we'll also need
 that
 diana_coman: what a great #o log
 to start
 the day
 to! BingoBoingo draft looks good, I'd probably just add a comma after "to
 take shape"; and congrats
 to jfw on a straight-to-the-point quote!
 lobbes: Also, are you good for
 tomorrow night or were you looking for doing
 this during
 the day? I'm slaving in
 the mines
 tomorrow but my night is clear. If need be I may be able
 to weasel a work-from-home day
 though, so I'll check back when I wake up
 tomorrow
 lobbes: Since you already have
 that script working, I figure we may as well use it for
 this piece. All my log history is in a Postgres database
 though, so I need
 to "convert" my data at least once. Would you be able
 to send me a sample of
 that logstory.txt?
 lobbes: Then I realized
 that all
 that insanity was indeed because I was needlessly
 translating all kinds of strings across boundaries. I
 think
 the cleanest way
 to do
 this historical (May 28, 2016
 to Now) log backfill is if I just provide you a
 text file in
 the same format as your "logstory.txt" you reference in 
this comment  ericbot: Logged on 2019-12-04 04:37:32 mircea_popescu: lobbes wtf dude, you set ALL of
 these
 to 2019-12-03 22:03:06
 time ?! didn't we go
 through an entire discussion of how it should increase monotonically ? gah.
 lobbes: mp_en_viaje: In preparation of our next attempt at getting
 this project done, I've been going
 through my 
faff-fest from last
 time.. and
 trying
 to figure out how we should pick back up
  jfw: mp_en_viaje: do you have a specific goal in mind for
 Thursday's wallet work? Do you also want
 to use
 the online part (I would imagine so but could
 technically be done without)? If so, note
 that it
 takes about a day
 to scan
 the present blockchain once fed
 the address(es) of interest, and requires a
 TRB node. If you wish
 to also send
 the rawtx using it, as would be most proper, we'll also need
 that
 diana_coman: bvt: also, mind packing in next vpatch either removal of
 that Makefile or an update
 to it so it covers
 the new .gpr files? As it is now it's doing half a job and even
 that unclear why via makefile anyway - it would possibly make more sense
 to just have one .gpr file
 that allows you
 to build all with a single command but anyways.
 diana_coman: ...
 that; for illustration, here's
 the 
output from vtree and antecedents on eucrypt_oaep_fix_checks.vpatch (ran in
 the same
 test dir
 that can be had from 
here); antecedents gives
 the correct path genesis->ch6->ch7->ch9->ch10->oaep_fix_checks, but in vtree's output it's very hard
 to
 tell
 that ch10 is meant as child of ch9 rather
 than ...
  diana_coman: bvt:
 the antecedents/descendants commands behave as expected now indeed;
 the output from vtree
 though seems confusing as it is now because of
 the order in which children are apparently shown in between siblings so
 that one has
 to
 track and count spaces
 to be able
 to say what belongs where and what seems
 the child of
 the node immediately above
 turns out
 to be meant instead of child of node 2 lines above, not sure if you intended it like ...
 diana_coman: I'll get around
 to it later
 today and will let you know how it went.
 diana_coman: bvt: ah, glad
 to hear you found
 the
 trouble; whichever way you prefer really, I can move
 the slot
 to Friday, not an issue (and otherwise plenty
 to fill
 the Monday
 time, heh)
 bvt: diana_coman: fixed link;
 ty for your
 test set, i have
 the fix (totally my bad), which I can upload
 today in a few hours (as a vpatch) if you still have a
 timeslot dedicated
 to v.sh
 tomorrow, or if you prefer it with a writeup, i will publish it until
 thursday.
 diana_coman: bvt: I forgot
 the "
http" on
 the link
 to
 the .tar.gz in my latest comment on your site, would you mind fixing it for me? something's still weird with
 that eucrypt dir & v.sh so I've uploaded it, if anyone else wants
 to have a look at it.
  trinque: possibly has
 to do with environment variables, investigating
 that.
 trinque: what
 the everloving fuck it's doing caring about
 the state of a
 terminal is... who even would bother?
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-07 07:02:54 mp_en_viaje: aite, 
 this is by now
 turning into way
 too much of a joke.
 mp_en_viaje: incidentally, anyone read
 the flying inn ?
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-07 20:05:24 jfw: 
http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2020-03-07#1959156 - I first
 took
 this as "it's fine either way" but maybe
 there's a question
 there
 too. Supposing
 the change output always came first;
 then, someone who knows
 this gets more information about how much you're sending where from looking at
 the
 transaction
 than if it came in a random position. And
 this
 thought would seem
 to extend
 to any process
  ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-07 13:54:32 mp_en_viaje: yes,
 there is more : it drives assonances in
 the readership lol.
 jfw: 
http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2020-03-07#1959156 - I first
 took
 this as "it's fine either way" but maybe
 there's a question
 there
 too. Supposing
 the change output always came first;
 then, someone who knows
 this gets more information about how much you're sending where from looking at
 the
 transaction
 than if it came in a random position. And
 this
 thought would seem
 to extend
 to any process
  ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-07 19:12:56 mp_en_viaje: but anyway,
 the problem never was whether single-character-x or single-character-y is
 to be your indentation scheme.
 the problem was when a unit of indentation is made up of n characters, such
 that 1st
 tabulation is implemented as
 three space characters, and 2nd as six.
 jfw: right. well me scheme is a good bit smaller
 than either and will bear my signature.
 mp_en_viaje: jfw, i wasn't
 talking about
 the instant case necessarily ; but in general. i expect most 
2013-ish vintage itemsd have neither gnat nor python.
  jfw: What's an offline machine likely
 to have? gnat? python? And how
 to install
 the wallet at all if no new software?
 mp_en_viaje: ah ah. i momentarily forgot about
 that part.
 jfw: hm, I wonder how much isn't clear
 then. I wrote a Scheme interpreter, which is part of what I need
 to get published.
 This in
 turn requires only gcc.
 ossabot: Logged on 2020-03-07 18:23:47 jfw: mp_en_viaje: how do you define 
totalitarian systems? (before I even
 try
 to add on
 the 'meaningful' part)
  mp_en_viaje: h
http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2020-03-07#1959124 << and
 to answer
 the meaningful part : consider
 the usg's "obscenity standard". it is perfectly an' epitomatically meaningless, i care naught
 that a buncha idle farmhands who can't
 talk for all
 the shit in
 their mouth "all agree".
 this inexpressible agreement is
 the definition of meaninglessness.
  mp_en_viaje: i have nfi why exactly your offline
 thing is in scheme, as opposed
 to something more likely
 to be found on an offline system (which, definitionally, ain't gonna be importing software in its lifetime).
 mp_en_viaje: yes well, i dunno how much of
 this "if in
 the future" is useful in context. i mean, maybe
 the aliens invade, gouge
 the eyes of anyone who makes filenames under 6 characters long.
 jfw: would work. Another
 thing coming
 to mind is if
 the
 two parts ended up rewritten
 to
 the same language,
 they could share some common details like base58. - as you say
 jfw: hm, so
 the genesis would just be a placeholder manifest basically?
 mp_en_viaje: i dunno
 that i'd ever want
 to press both at
 the same
 time ; i also don't see
 that
 they have
 to have separate genesises necessarily. you can press one r
 the other by selecting
 the proper branch neh ?
 jfw: 3. I had planned
 to make a single genesis of both online (python) and offline (Scheme) parts, as it seemed sensible
 to have it all in one place even if
 the intent is
 to use separately, but dorion brought up whether it'd be better
 to have
 two
 trees. I can't quite see
 that having any advantages, but how about you?
 mp_en_viaje: but anyway,
 the problem never was whether single-character-x or single-character-y is
 to be your indentation scheme.
 the problem was when a unit of indentation is made up of n characters, such
 that 1st
 tabulation is implemented as
 three space characters, and 2nd as six.
 jfw: 2. I forget if I mentioned it in my spec but my code shuffles
 the order of
 transaction outputs, for obfuscation or general "why not". Is
 this reasoanble / acceptable?
 mp_en_viaje: i dunno
 that it has
 to be nailed ad hoc here.
 there were preliminary discussions years ago
 that didn't resolve and haven't been revisited
 jfw: So
 the question is... I dunno, 'wut do?' Or, can we leave
 this one for now?
 jfw: mp_en_viaje: a few other questions come up as I prepare
 to genesis. 1:
 tabs vs spaces - my Scheme code is all spaces and I don't know how
 to reasonably do it otherwise; lisp has established indenting conventions
 that
 tend
 to line
 things up nicely but require 1-column granularity. Somehow, setting
 the
 tabstop
 to 1 doesn't seem like any kind of solution (and still not sure I even grasp
 the problem).
 jfw: Can I assume you have an x86_64 unixlike with gcc for
 the install?
 jfw: a whoops, CR on UTC-6, so
 that'd be my local.
 jfw: how's 15:00 UTC / 10am local on
 Thursday?
 jfw: somewhat aware, seen some of
 their 'artistic' products at least
 mp_en_viaje: much better examples would be dadaism/absurdism/situationism or say existentialism if you're aware of
 those.
 mp_en_viaje: anyway,
 the problem with
 the
 textbook go-to examples of
 totalitarian systems, namely
 the various attempts at socialism in
 the 20th century, is
 that
 they're very weak examples of
 totalitarian systems and comparatively much stronger examples of closed systems.
 that's
 their salient feature,
 their closedness, universally premature, and by a rather mengele hand.
 mp_en_viaje: for as long as you live, your death does not exist, and
 therefore is no concern of yours; once your death exists or whatever actualizes itself
 there's necessarily nobody any longer
 there
 to fret about it.
 jfw: well, I suppose I should rather ask who
 to read
 there
 than just guessing.
 jfw: ha! not familiar with
 the stoic argument, would it be something like "once you're dead you no longer have
 the problem of coming death"?
 mp_en_viaje: and re classification and completeness : linneus' system is always complete, as per
 the usual stoic argument re death : just before a "new species is found" it is complete because well... and just after a new species is found, it is STILL just as complete, because by
 the very description as is required
 to show
 the new species it also necessarily completes itself.
 mp_en_viaje: 
this guy (who was in spain, and who was in many other early soups back when all
 these players were still kids or unheard of) said it about hitler something like good gracious, he won't do, he's a vegetarian
 teetotalitarian. chesterton and
 the crowd picked it up.
  mp_en_viaje: o look,
 the internets don't know about it.