log☇︎
27000+ entries in 0.069s
mod6: i mean, it needs unix to run to begin with... so wtf
mod6: So far, and i've only spent a few hours on it, but I'm so hoplessly lost on hoon, that i don't see how this could be more useful than unix at this point.
mod6: But, ya know, times change. How do we surpass Unix? We’ve got two words for you - typed pipes!
mod6: Unix today is ancient, bloated and debilitated, but its historic greatness is eternal. Comparing Unix to other OSes of its time is comparing Shakespeare to other playwrights of his time.
mod6: (Chapter 1.7): If a real OS runs on the bare hardware and is preemptive, it’s clear that Arvo is not a real OS and will never be one. It will always run on Unix. Of course in a sense it comes to bury Unix, but also to praise it - to imitate it - and even to surpass it.
mod6: the guy says, "urbit will always run on top of unix." but d00d also wants this to surpass *nix at some point...
mod6: its like i wanna go down this rabbit hole and figure this thing out, but I don't think im smart enough or something.
mod6: this urbit thing is wacky
mod6: there is another that seems to try to translate scribbles to runes, but I haven't gotten it to work on my vim yet.
mod6: just a vim script for unix so the syntax can be color-highlighted. didn't mean to get yall excited.
mod6: haha, no i wish.
mod6: cool, there is a hoon.vim
mod6: heheh, well since x86 intel, its not been nearly as widely used. i think that network addresses are all passed in lsb though, and then they added htonl/s ntohl/s for translation, etc.
mod6: i haven't used an LSB system since i worked on porting fbsd to sparc64
mod6: nice
mod6: its not as bad as brainfuck, but not by much
mod6: ahh. im trying to familiarize myself with these 'runes'
mod6: ?
mod6: are you getting good with hoon, jurov
mod6: i figure, maybe they can help my urbit n00bness until i get my sealegs.
mod6: CY said he didn't want to do an irc channel because urbit can be sort of like IRC in and of itself. but in the mean time he'll set one up until it gets further along.
mod6: haha, nice. i just joined in over there a few mins ago too.
mod6: *poof*
mod6: i wanna say that happened a few times even.
mod6: yeah haha.
mod6: yeah, thats pretty awesome.
mod6: aight, now that i've got this thing back to non-suck mode...
mod6: haha. i'll even do a dance move for a quick .01 BTC
mod6: im gonna quit this shit and go work at walmart selling plants.
mod6: well, either do i. i was just trolled by jurov.
mod6: im not sure what to think about this thing yet.
mod6: maybe its just a pile of shit
mod6: but it wasn't helpful what-so-ever.
mod6: i tried to find a solution to this problem on the fuckin google groups thing and there was a thread about it.
mod6: im a dumbass for listening to you
mod6: haha, yeah.
mod6: yeah, it seems that this guy Curtis Yarvin kinda goes against the grain with this one. im not a haskell guy or what not, so I'm not real sure what to think just yet.
mod6: :P
mod6: so yah, 9/10
mod6: Perform the optimization of loop unrolling. This is done for all loops and usually makes programs run more slowly. `-funroll-all-loops' implies `-fstrength-reduce' as well as `-frerun-cse-after-loop'.
mod6: jurov: -funroll-all-loops
mod6: mircea_popescu: yeah, i recloned the repos and rebuilt. works fine. it's early in the project so, yeah shit happens.
mod6: jurov: you trollin'?
mod6: yeah, that was pretty interesting. like the first day I look into it, i have to blow everything away and start over.
mod6: (was worse before the update it seems to me... but still laaags a bit.)
mod6: I rebuild my sub just a bit ago because of this (http://www.urbit.org/2013/10/06/nicu.html), seems to be a bit more responsive.. but not what i would expect.
mod6: has anyone had trouble with the urbit terminal being like really slow?
mod6: benkay_: Ahh, I've read more now on the urbit. I see what you mean by the 9-times thing as temporary. And after reading Datskovskiy's comments it's interesting that it was put in to begin with.
mod6: don't destroy the universe!
mod6: Strange. Yet, kinda cool at first look here. I'll play with it a bit.
mod6: i kinda think the idea of the urbit ship being virtual real estate. Can only be transfered 9 times before it has no value.
mod6: I don't wanna get too far off course just yet. Gotta wrap up this current bitotter work and get further along with my look into cramer-shoup
mod6: This thing is pretty neat, might take me some time to learn hoon tho.
mod6: I just saw that. :)
mod6: this urbit thing is neato
mod6: ;;bc,stats
mod6: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12333
mod6: ya 12333 would have been during reagan
mod6: ;;bc,stats
mod6: :>
mod6: ;;market --buy 4040404040404
mod6: lol 404!
mod6: ;;bc,stats
mod6: haha
mod6: haha
mod6: "giving a negitive fuck will destroy the universe"
mod6: lol goat on a boat
mod6: anyway, with 2.6 they had the O(1) scheduler then the CFS, so I guess that works a lot better now.
mod6: what a disaster that was
mod6: i basically gave up all hope with linux after the 2.4 kernel
mod6: *yoink*
mod6: that works too
mod6: guess i haven't used slack since like quite a while tho.
mod6: i've been using slack since like ... mid-90s, always used `shutdown -h|-r now`.
mod6: ahh.
mod6: what distro?
mod6: *shrug* :}
mod6: i've never even seen -t, only that on *bsd/linux you can either enter "now" or a future TIME as [yymmddhhss]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=shutdown&sektion=8
mod6: wonder what distro that's for.
mod6: gah linux, 3 man pages of SHUTDOWN(8) that have no -t flag, then you find this one: http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?shutdown+8
mod6: we should only be so lucky
mod6: and thestringpuller if you use -r, it'll reboot. if you use -h, it'll halt and never come back ;)
mod6: weird, didn't see that in the linux shutdown(8) or freebsd shutdown(8)
mod6: what is the -t flag? i don't think that actually exists.
mod6: lol sudo
mod6: :]
mod6: US-Gov:~$ shutdown -h now
mod6: haha
mod6: ok thx
mod6: hey Namworld can i get fbsd on xen? or is that an arij question
mod6: i need to go to bed
mod6: 1.1x10^12
mod6: lol my bad
mod6: up 1.1^12 satoshi this month. *yawn*
mod6: wow
mod6: wasn't someone up like 11k this month or did I see that wrong?
mod6: ;;bc,stats
mod6: ;;ticker
mod6: but alas, a good source of lulz
mod6: not too sure, that swamp will give you intellectual malaria methinks