log☇︎
23200+ entries in 0.161s
asciilifeform: i do sometimes wonder what goes on in the heads, 'hey i hate them nao, mebbe prb is where it's at', wtf
mod6: asciilifeform: thanks for the extra info there. I did check the two IPs myself too, no worky. I figure, the man has a -10 from Mr. Popescu, and no longer visits this chamber. Ergo, he's ejected.
mod6: mircea_popescu: ok cool, if you don't mind then, I'll probably just do deedbot wallet since it's a bit quicker for me.
mircea_popescu: either way tbh, i dun care.
mod6: mircea_popescu: Hi Sir, if I win the auction here, how would you like me to settle? Via btc from deedbot-wallet, or via ECU and trade in eulora (this may take a day or so to exchange my BTC into ECU hope this isn't a big deal).
mod6: And now I'm not personally hosting the foundation website, so that'll save me some pocket-lint.
asciilifeform: iirc shinohai also started prb approx 6mo after his 'what am i doing here' monologue
mod6: I should have waited 4 more minutes to send -- no big deal, but the statement ended up in the October bin, instead of November.
asciilifeform: ( i.e. transformator for 256b K that produces K1,...Kn that go to equiv. end states )
asciilifeform: at least until i actually do it and it spews forth the pill eqn.
asciilifeform: the fundamental problem with 'i'ma use turing-complete automaton as hash!' is that ~specifically~ the aspect that makes it seem appealing to begin with, is the very same thing that kills you, it is impossible to prove non-cyclicity
asciilifeform: i had an automata thing, but found that i could not in good conscience play it for the prize, i never found any approach to a proof that it dun have ( as mircea_popescu called ) 'kek state'
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: the bigger saddity, is that i dun have anything to offer to plug-in replace 'serpent', nao just as in '16 when mircea_popescu was offering prizes
a111: Logged on 2018-10-31 17:41 Mocky: I have more blog posts churning thru the pipeline atm, mostly written for some days now. photo handling jammed up my process
asciilifeform: loox like finding answer might add up to costing some penies ( or not, lessee, if dulap dun suffice, i'ma lease some cycles on lulazon cluster )
asciilifeform: i still dun know what the actual keyspace is, just yet
asciilifeform: hm trinque is Mocky currently in the deedbot rotation ? i missed his last 2 posts apparently
diana_coman: lmao, I thought that was qatar's halloween pic!
asciilifeform: btw if it aint obvious -- the denser the horiz. path across the pic, the ~easier~ it is to find alt-solutions to that line of the expansion (i.e. rearrangements of the input key that yield the same mod-2 summation when multiplied with that row of the matrix )
asciilifeform: it's funny, if only to me -- if author wanted to make the keyspace == 2**256, all he would have had to do is to drop a copy of the 256bit key into the expansion. but i can already picture the fatlogic, 'oh noez, that wouldn't do, will leak key via plaintext cuz not whitened'
asciilifeform: i'm reminded of the chessboards they used to print in sov newspapers. after a good rain.
asciilifeform: these , in a hash output, is.. i lack the words
diana_coman: myeah, I was just admiring them
asciilifeform: i expect the gaussation itself could take coupla wks on dulap, once the req'd pieces are cut and glued
asciilifeform: will note, tho, re fg timeouts -- the most likely waiting-on-fg scenario is starvation, rather than outright hangage , thing shits out 7kB/s per spec, 8 on a good day; i expect it will be the limiting reactant re how many rsa msgs / sec can be produced
asciilifeform: but i'ma stop picking on diana_coman's item for nao
asciilifeform: http://ossasepia.com/2018/10/31/smg-comms-chapter-5-rsa-with-oaep-from-ada/#selection-155.1206-155.2305 << example of where i'dve used an ada record
asciilifeform: fwiw i've witnessed the death of usb ports per se.
asciilifeform: granted i've yet to witness a dead fg. but i dun have a written guarantee from the gods, that they can never die, no
asciilifeform: diana_coman: metoo, i had to breathe ada for yrs before working all the c sad out of my follicles
diana_coman: asciilifeform, so far I'd rather have halted box than continuing
diana_coman: I think I do suffer from a bit of C-induced anti-unions bias
diana_coman: I know of variant records but I did not think of them for the conversion really
diana_coman: I missed that somehow; I'll dig it up
asciilifeform: but i dun recall from my head; it is in the logs somewhere
asciilifeform: diana_coman: aha, i use same method
asciilifeform: it is one of the reasons why i section my routines into staticlinkable libs , rather than 'take this and cut&paste'
asciilifeform: there is no particular reason why ~erry~ proggy has to have the same pragma fascism as ffa ( and in fact i've written several that cannot function under that set of constraints, e.g. the mmap thing requires System.Address )
asciilifeform: implicit conditionals aint evil per se , tho ; i banned them in ffa specifically as they get in the way of constanttimeism, is all ☟︎
diana_coman: I don't have any array concatenation, no
asciilifeform: ( the only other operation i know to do this, is array concatenation ; hence my earlier suspicion )
diana_coman: makes sense; I'm adding the note there and the ref for now
diana_coman: asciilifeform, myeah; part of the reason why I did not just nuke the C thing but rather kept them both in there at least for now
asciilifeform: the q, i mean.
Mocky: I have more blog posts churning thru the pipeline atm, mostly written for some days now. photo handling jammed up my process ☟︎
asciilifeform: diana_coman: the caveat re my method, is that i do not presently know how to ~portably~ 'lock' the thing ( so >1 process dun eat from it )
diana_coman: "Over the next few days I started to meet people and collect the items I’d need to survive. " - ahahaha, that guide to Doha-zone was nice to read; how's that quest going?
asciilifeform: if somehow FG were to catch on with the http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-26#1866428 crowd, the situation will not differ so much from the current : coupla 100 people will have the genuine article, and 9,999,999 sad folx will have physically-similar item made in hong kong to washington's specs. and i couldn't do a thing about it. ☝︎
asciilifeform: currently i'm not even certain that makes sense to ~sell~ a crypto iron; possibly a truly-serious user ~must~ make 'his own' , out of standardized, exhaustively-testable, and -- most importantly -- mix&match-able, components, from a design he has read & understood.
asciilifeform: for instance, i have here 2 FG units i flew ~back~ from pizarro, they had been pawed by randos when ben_vulpes had his customs debacle. in so far as i can tell , they have orig firmware still, and by erry possible test they are virginal, but even i cannot say whether they're 'still FG' or not !
asciilifeform: so i have nfi how one'd make it a +ev biznis-proposition.
asciilifeform: naturally this aint exactly commercially-hotstuff, it suffers from same problem as my other items, e.g. FG, namely that there's maybe 100 thinking people alive total, i.e. folx who could reliably distinguish the real thing from 9000x-cheaper imitation liquishit.
asciilifeform: i suspect it's the closest thing physically possible to saw-proof sram 'safe'.
asciilifeform: ( and no, you can't buy remanence-free sram, afaik, off-the-shelf, i devised it and it is published only in the l0gz.)
a111: Logged on 2017-05-16 01:51 asciilifeform: if i were drawing up such a thing, i'd even have the sram work in such a way that 10 is a 1 on odd clock cycles, 0 on even
asciilifeform: i.e., ic that when paired with another of its kind, and rng, saves internally the pad; but won't simply disgorge it unless in a synchronous link with the item it was synced with, as described in the algo.
diana_coman: asciilifeform, I did not yet have the time to look at it in more detail, I just skimmed through the results
diana_coman: mod6, also, re running keccak by itself - have a look at the tests that I provided for it in eucrypt as they work effectively as an "example of running keccak" too
phf: mod6: just fyi i was able to press eucrypt using v.pl by patching it to use vtools's `ksum' for hashing instead of sha512sum and `vpatch' for pressing instead of gnu. http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/PZ4hX/?raw=true ☟︎
asciilifeform: lessee if mircea_popescu or diana_coman beat me to the pill, i'ma not spoil the exact algo just yet.
mod6: Can anyone else confirm? Maybe I did something wrong or have the wrong file?
mod6: Ok, nevermind, they don't seem to be. But I just simply pressed the genesis and it barfed on a README file:
mircea_popescu: i suppose the only moral being... "opressed groups are opressed for a fucking reason".
mircea_popescu: i'm not saying the pantsuit's creative or anything. i'm just amused at how fucking awkward they can get, srsly, need special words for things that only other similar idiots would be using so as not to risk conversation with someone not similarly fucktarded ?
asciilifeform: but funnily enuff that was the only place i ever saw it, prior to mircea_popescu's mention
asciilifeform: ( for all i know, he devised it )
asciilifeform: we will also know if some appear more times than others, i.e. producing a nonflat keyspace.
asciilifeform: diana_coman: later tonight i'ma post the version with reduction
diana_coman: asciilifeform, fwiw this code is actually so nice to read; and no, I don't see any trouble with it nor anything that doesn't make sense (I did have to search for some of the lisp routines but that's just my lack of lisp-fu and it was easy enough to find out what they do more clearly)
mircea_popescu: ok, i need to go get some sleep, this is getting ridoinculous.
asciilifeform: diana_coman: is wai i posted
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu, diana_coman ^ still needs the elementary reduction massage, but i went ahead an' posted, in case somebody wants.
diana_coman: mircea_popescu, uhm, I thought that there was at least ONE thing clear: namely that "something's defo broken"
mircea_popescu: to use it as a cipher i'd do a K exchange and then f(P-1) xor P = E. where P-1 is the previous message.
mircea_popescu: i didn't, i'm just fucking about.
asciilifeform: i gotta wonder what else they've got; maybe also a lunapark where only the employees get to ride
asciilifeform: ( i'm not actually certain why we do this test prior to bastardism, there's 0 point running any test on a block that fails do-we-have-its-father litmus . really this is leftover logic from removal of orphanage )
asciilifeform: i.e. it's not simply an alt
a111: Logged on 2018-10-23 22:46 asciilifeform: i suspected shitfork, when realized that the 501 blox gotta be a few kB most, ea. -- my pipe couldn't disgorge 501 human-sized blox in <2sec
mircea_popescu: i suppose that could be the backup alternative then : if we end up ditching serpent, we use a rsa packet to move ~1.4kb of entropy for initializing the mt, and then use mt generated pads for a cipher.
mircea_popescu: as best i can tell -- the only options are either keep using serpent or else use some kind of recursive hash otp
diana_coman: and then I read the rest of the log; ofc
asciilifeform: same observation arguably can be applied to errything else tho, so i'm not entirely sure it's a useful one.
asciilifeform: rsa & c-s (the latter, really a narrowed elgamal) are the only 2 oasis i know to exist in that desert.
asciilifeform: ( i.e. http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-30#1867703 ) ☝︎
asciilifeform: whereas if you don't throw them out, you have a reversible thing that is just multiplication, and i can gcd(p1,p2) == K.
asciilifeform: sorta why it did not make sense to asciilifeform that people sat and 'i'ma make a hash', 'i'ma make a cipher', a good x is exactly a good y
asciilifeform: it's the reason for asciilifeform's lulzsubmission to mircea_popescu's 'block contest'. it wasn't even joak, it was 'rsa is the only tool in that box that i have any reason to think actually worx'
a111: Logged on 2018-10-30 16:51 asciilifeform: the closest thing i can think of to a working variant of mircea_popescu's device, is where you keep the carries, and use primes... and we know it as.. rsa
asciilifeform: in '16 i burned coupla months on the q of 'can haz', mainly on np-hard problems / turing-complete cellular automata, in place of sboxation. but got stuck on the 'guaranteed hard instance' boojum.
asciilifeform: reasonable cipher requires element that is at least a ~conjectured~ trap door (i.e. 'entry is a buck but exit is two'), e.g. exponentiation-with-primes
mircea_popescu: and i further agree with you -- it is a very strong commentary and ceiling upon the security of "block ciphers". because yes, literally, all otehrs are just this with magic-numbered RBs. which... is EXACTLY the same "introduce say crc", except hidden under so much smoke.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i agree with you, this is a shredder not a cipher ; moreover -- if we for instance tried to add say crc into the message as padding, then therefore we'd be by the same hand introducing structure, ie weakness.
asciilifeform: the closest thing i can think of to a working variant of mircea_popescu's device, is where you keep the carries, and use primes... and we know it as.. rsa ☟︎
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform fuck me, NOW i understand what you were on about yest --- E aren't THE RESULTS, but merely THE LAST BIT of a result. consequently, not actually eq system.
asciilifeform: perchance i can provoke mircea_popescu into writing a proggy that deciphers ?
asciilifeform: i gotta admit that i still dun grasp how to decipher unambiguously into 1 single orig plaintext
diana_coman: mircea_popescu, but uhm, isn't that precisely the example I give in the comment and which leads to the wrong value? this: but with the formula above it would be E(2)= P(2) xor 0*P(1) xor 1*P(2) xor 0*P(3) xor 1*P(4) = P(2) xor P(2) xor P(4) = 1 xor 1 xor 0 = 0 .
mircea_popescu: just like in the 80s, that same "here i am" was http://trilema.com/2016/portrait-of-an-adult-woman/
mircea_popescu: in 2010s, this "here i am" is ^