22300+ entries in 0.157s

a111: Logged on 2018-11-12 12:10 bvt:
i'll check wtf is wrong with the comments system
a111: Logged on 2018-10-30 02:34 BingoBoingo: Also December 7, 8, and 9th will be the expocannabis Uruguay.
I plan on going there in a recon capacity, if anyone else is looking for a very Uruguay reason to visit Uruguay, that would be the weekend to come on down.
mircea_popescu: and speaking of
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-30#1867509 : perhaps this is just the ticket mod6 , take a few days / a week off whatever, ~BY YOURSELF~. so you can fucking think. go hang out with BingoBoingo , fuck some latino whores, get drunk once or twice... these are the mainstay "
i'm in a paper bag how do
i get out" methods since time immemorial for a fucking reason.
☝︎☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-11-12 11:22 diana_coman:
I suppose it's the gcc >4.9 that made it eat up the whole part as "html"
bvt: also,
i think that pushing gcc-6 patches to frozen system (mpi) defeats the purpose of the standard republican compiler, so the post and vpatch is more of
☟︎ bvt:
i'll check wtf is wrong with the comments system
☟︎ diana_coman:
I suppose it's the gcc >4.9 that made it eat up the whole part as "html"
☟︎ ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: after
i find these two roots,
i would gladly serve and spreadsheetize this into the pizarro mysql/mp-wp
BingoBoingo: Kinda why
I'm excited about breaking down and killing the legacy notes file
☟︎ BingoBoingo: It's an experiment.
I'd rather test auctionbot on something other than Pizarro criticals, and if it turns out there's substantial bidder interest in S.QNTR maybe it baits some more submissions from The Lordship and the honorable L2.
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu:
I do not yet. Last
I looked into trying eulora the Nvidia 'cg' binary dependency was blocking
trinque:
I didn't know it was offline, but at any rate, would make the mention of "remote hands" a hell of a lot more meaningful
BingoBoingo: trinque: Linking to the blog is pointless until
I bring the blog online again. It's on the top of tomorrow's do list
BingoBoingo: Prior to September 7th, zero Pizarro Bitcoin was in the deedbot wallet. The payment of the Foundation colo invoice was the first Pizarro transaction outside of payments as a customer/wildcatter. Outside of deedbot
I am holding 0.20113128 BTC Pizarro carryover BTC from the BBISP days.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
I'll take the standard F image. Will walk over now to place the drive and ping when
I get back. Will move imaged drive to the Rockchip during a later walk.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
I expect the minutiae to be ready within the week.
I'd like to get some punch list stuff out of the way.
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
I just plucked 12 character strings outta the soup
mod6:
I've been doing some chores here,
I gotta run away again and do more. :/ ben_vulpes, if you have another Q, just ping me.
mod6: *nod* looks great,
I like the use of the hash there.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 20:22 ben_vulpes: BingoBoingo mod6: are there any non-pizarro transactions in the ledger outputs that
i have from both of you?
diana_coman: right;
I meant in it's current use of "default, everywhere"
diana_coman: streams start looking increasingly to me like an abstraction born out of "
I *have to deal* with those insane inputs so ..."
diana_coman: ah,
I see it;
I did look and
I saw you used both but
I couldn't confidently identify the decision as to where one and where the other
diana_coman: perhaps if the structures and protocol were way hairier than they there, the gains would be worth it - but in such case
I'm not sure it wouldn't point to a need to simplify rather than a need for streams or some such
diana_coman: re are still all those parts that are anyway no concern of upper layers (e.g. crc, padding) so there is still some part that has to walk the thing component-by-component anyway. The more
I look at it, the more
I get the impression that the idea of "serialize in 1 statement the whole stuff" is not worth pushing beyond simple types (
i.e. yes, serialize in one line unsigned_32 but not the whole content of one message)
diana_coman:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-10#1870705 -> the more
I think of this, the less
I see the case for it: essentially
I don't think the serialization part should really be that important that it forces upstream to deal with fixed-size records only sort of thing. Also, for the case at hand, it's basically unclear that the gain is worth it anyway: yes, fixed-size (
i.e. max-size) record means one can do the serialization of that directly but the
☝︎ ben_vulpes:
i'm walking from july forward, comparing cash position on the pizarro book at the end of each month to cash held for pizarro in both of your accounts, want to ensure that
i'm not rolling any personal transactions into the calculations.
ben_vulpes: BingoBoingo mod6: are there any non-pizarro transactions in the ledger outputs that
i have from both of you?
☟︎ BingoBoingo: Well,
I am about to set far enough away to grab a big chunk of meat, or maybe some shrimp and savor this delicious pile of tedium in front of me
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform:
I will let you know when it's done.
I have a poor eye for what would be enough to programmatize from
BingoBoingo: <mod6> BingoBoingo: don't forget to send those invoices when you get a chance today. << Since
I am elbow deep in the customer information today,
I plan to fire off the invoices as soon as things are polished up.
BingoBoingo: Update:
I have hit a groove on a consistent style for the customer account information.
I am going to stretch the legs and look for some non-chocolate food soon. For a preview, here is the style as applied to the S.MG and S.NSA accounts -
http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/mVzN6/?raw=true mod6: Yeah,
I recall. There's just no more to give, presently.
mod6: asciilifeform:
I'll take some time, but in all honesty,
I think Mr. Popescu has it on all accounts.
I don't even think he wants to be right on this one, yet he is. And presently, there is nothing
I can do to pour myself into the Republic, Foundation, or Pizarro more than
I currently am. And at this level of commitment, is harmful to all.
mod6: (
I had half-forgotten about it myself)
mod6: Yeah,
I'll think it over, Sir. But, my main objective is to do what is best for the whole, instead of the individual.
mod6: The same goes with the Foundation, new leadership is required. This means that
I will not be within the lordship anymore, but better that, than dishonor.
mod6: So
I think the correct thing to do here is to step-down from the Pizarro board, let someone else direct and lead the company to glory, as opposed to the back pages of tardstalk.
mod6:
I will take some time to think it over, but this past year has taken a tremendous toll on my physical and mental health.
I'm not doing right by myself, my family or the republic.
I always said that
I wanted to do the Republic as my main thing in life (outside family), but as
I've said before, we're just not quite there yet.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 13:48 mircea_popescu: and in the same vein : if
i lose my fucking carkeys, my "prospective plan for carkey finding" doesn't read ANYTHING like "day 1 : look for carkeys ; day 2 : look for carkeys ; day 3 : look for carkeys ; day 4...".
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 13:33 mircea_popescu: you're a good man, and
i trust you, and
i know as a matter of fact my trust's not misplaced. we absolutely have to either adjust you to the tasks you have or the tasks you have to you, however, because there's simply no way to maintain trustworthyness on the long haul while capacity-activity mismatch is ongoing.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 13:33 mircea_popescu: can you ~believe~ how much like something you'd read on tardstalk "investments" your workproduct ends up ?! and this in 2018 ? why, because you've been secretly saving it through a time capsule, insulated from review, all this time ?! god almighty, last thing
i want is the yahoo peterl-ism of 2013 perpetuated a second past the end of that year.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 13:32 mircea_popescu: mod6 after a night's meditation,
I still don't see a direct solution for your problem.
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> but
i will add, e.g. rk draws (and emits as heat naturally) ~7watt on a bad day. << On this note new heavy metal rockchip drives were still cool to the touch when
I visited the rack yesterday
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 16:52 asciilifeform:
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-11#1871149 << before that little subthread gets entirely lost in the cacophony of the moar urgent matters : mircea_popescu
i also suspect that even without radio etc exotica, gossiptronic routing would give ~same connective reliability to e.g. a flat in kamchatka with 3 heathen isp pipes, as actual dc cage has today
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 16:00 BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> prior to pizarro,
i pictured 'tmsr isp' as a moar 'noncontact' item, where heathen contract is signed and robotic 'bring server into gossip net' item is installed immediately. but FG / we-want-custom-irons etc changed this picture << This and those surprise power cycling of dulap
I/II (
I forget the dulap version history)
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform>
i'll admit to having had this problem in the past,
i read so much l0gz that they work into dreams when
i sleep << My worst nighmares have involved text scrolling in a window
ben_vulpes:
i could dig up the reams of satoshi-addition on my eng pad if it would ease your mind
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform:
i will know when this discrepancy crept in by wednesday.
ben_vulpes:
i'm thinking that
i actually want to rerun the numbers at sept, because
i was damned certain that everything was kosher at that point.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-11 04:16 mod6: Ok, so
I'm gonna call it a night. What
I do know at this point is the ``surplus'' that we're seeing in the statements goes back at least through the August report. However,
I'm not even certain at this point if what
I'm seeing is actually incorrect, as
I said earlier. Or if
I just don't understand what
I'm looking at. There's a strong chance that
I just don't understand it.
ben_vulpes: footsoldiering task for me: regrind financials from april forward, april being the second-to-last time
i audited cash held against statement claims (last time was before handoff to mod6, the correctness of which mod6 apparently doubts per
http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-11#1870970 )
☝︎ ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: never existed.
i tabulated in org-mode and did all of the calculations by hand.
ben_vulpes: it may be an 0.3s job to you or one of the ladies that you've trained. every time
i sat down to categorize the list of incoming/outgoing into cash account vs customer equity; depreciate the hardware; walk the customer list to determine how much to debit the customer equity line; calculate the value of the btc and uyu
i spent about eight hours on it in
i estimate in retrospect two four hour shifts (from
mircea_popescu:
i certainly can see the narrative that goes "first, the task was to add 6 and 8 and 11 ; then ben_vulpes wanted to take some hours to print out an adhesive 25 to paste on a box we'd therefore call computer ; then mod6 took a few days to complicatedly add by hand to 24 and 26 and so on". it's still a 0.3 second job, harsh mistress experiences notwithstanding.
mircea_popescu:
i still can't imagine how ~any approach fails on it, seeing how the whole customer list is what, dozen ? less ?
ben_vulpes: and
i never used a program because, (again cannot find the log link in reasonable-response time) at one point
i was working on a schema for tracking customers and what they were paying for and mircea_popescu said something along the lines of "wtf this is a simple text file and accounting problem"
☟︎