216600+ entries in 0.144s

ben_vulpes: >
threatened
to run over one of
the deputies with a baby stroller
mircea_popescu: "would you like
this slow as shit or slow as snails ?"
ben_vulpes: so "baww" but perhaps
the lols compound
trinque: the parent probably looks at
too many of
those SUPERIOR AFRICAN SEED pictures
trinque: probably had nonzero amount
to do with him being black
ben_vulpes: if only
there were an ounce of "prove it" left in america.
BingoBoingo: Slow HF face burns force closed vs open casket dilemma as passage of
time biases
towards closed casket
BingoBoingo: HF
to face for burns and calcium channel disruption and distraction
to sneak other calcium channel disruptor into butt.
BingoBoingo: If your are loyal Best Korean, how is
the Fallen Scion of dear leader different from Mr. Morningstar who
taunted Elliot in
the hell
that was Isla Vista.
BingoBoingo: The early "spray" and "needle" reports way also be
true. Perhaps assassins did multiple poisons and administration routes.
BingoBoingo: Only if medic got solution on skin. DMSO itself is not mega poison, just mega
transporter
through skin
BingoBoingo: Maybe endangering weilder is part of
the point?
ben_vulpes: if only join/parts weren't so frequently so spammy; it'd be nicely contextual for eg
the previous conversation in logs
ben_vulpes: a man may be forgiven
the odd
transmission
to otherwise apparently derelict friends' vessels
ben_vulpes: pete_dushenski: just
trying
to cheer you up, buddy!
pete_dushenski: ben_vulpes: i profit little from
things
that other people say
they plan
to do. you also can't dress
today for
tomorrow's weather.
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: cheers. photo was
taken on first
trip
to europe. house exchange in denmark/germany in
the days before airbnb.
Reuel: just couldnt resist posting
that video I ran into
Reuel: the link? it is
the beauty of diversity and
the power of friendship
Reuel: Anyway, loved
the plumber stories!
mircea_popescu: actually :
the quality of
the rng is
the limit on
the parallelization.
ben_vulpes: i
think i found some great again in my butthairs last night
ben_vulpes: pete_dushenski: yellen still planning
to raise rates
mircea_popescu: blockchain
technology chiefly consists of knowing when NOT
to implement one.
trinque: hm, yeah.
there's a good argument against building a shitty blockchain here.
mircea_popescu: if yes
the system's unbound, if no
then why
the fuck even bother, just do otp from get-go.
mircea_popescu: trinque understand
the problem with "I will also be piling up
the signed material for my records" : if during your lifespan you manage
to lose eg a 30yo hdd, because you've built a reviewable system
those
txn will be reviewable. are you on
the hook now for refunds ?
☟︎ mircea_popescu: contrairiwise,
there's not a lbockchain, ie, ever-growing pile of signed data
trinque: mircea_popescu: just means
that lobbesbot must have state which keeps
track of requests sent,
then matches
them
to incoming OTP,
then sends OTP if ==
mircea_popescu: i don't
think
there's anything fundamentally wrong with
the otp approach as opposed
to
the signature approach
tbh.
danielpbarron: that is, 3rd message only needs
to contain
the reply part of
the 2nd message. it's not necessary
to keep
the entire conversation
trinque: we're pretty close
to me bringing in an updated version of
the bot
danielpbarron: trinque, yeah
the reply contains
the first message plus
the responce. 3rd message (if needed) contains
text of 2nd message, and so on..
mircea_popescu: speaking of which
trinque : it's somewhat dubious you send plain otps. you should send request.string+otp.
danielpbarron: i'm
trying
to understand when a signature is prefered over a handshake of encrypted unsigned
texts
trinque: that adds a step on lobbesbot's side
that's unnecessary
trinque: I had already considered
this, and one avenue
there was
to put
the invoice data back into
the encrypted challenge
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron ie, you'd rather lobbesbot says something
to deedbot,
then !!v's ?
trinque: I get unsigned
text, I give you an encrypted OTP; how
then are you
to know
that OTP corresponds on my end
to an unmodified copy of your invoice?
danielpbarron: the otp is functionally
the same as a signature for
the purpose of keeping
text unmollested, and also
the same in
that neither can ensure a message is ever actually received
trinque: danielpbarron: specifically in
transit; I can't control what goes on in your castle, nor you in mine.
mircea_popescu: the whole point of republican activity being
to leverage computing power
to protect wetware circuitry as much as feasible and no more.
mircea_popescu: essentially. it allows
to filter
the flood at
the gate. if invoices are not signed
then deedbot has
to
talk
to person any
time an electric interaction happens ; if
they are signed person can have whitelists, deedbot need only
talk
to person when meaningful occurs.
trinque: also,
the OTP dance doesn't by itself confirm
that A received B's invoice as it was intended.
danielpbarron: so signatures could be said
to put
the burden on
the one making
the request, as an anti-spam measure
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron > dev/null/ except if
there's something in
there you want.
then you're sol.
mircea_popescu: the problem with having unsigned invoices is
that one morning you wake up and
there's 2 ^ 64 invoices waiting for you.
trinque: I will also be piling up
the signed material for my records
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron
the only reason it's signed (by
the bot) is so
that deedbot can distinguish it from a spoof.
mircea_popescu: and yes, singer = intended recipient ;
this way lobbes can make lobbesbot a deedbot account and get paid.
danielpbarron: is
the invoice meant
to be held against someone in public in
the case
they don't pay? and
that's why it is signed?
mircea_popescu: yeah
trinque something like
that. we'd have
to nail down a permanent invoice format
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron it's an invoice.
the idea is you pay
to run an auction.
danielpbarron: what is
the purpose of a signature? generally i mean. because as I understand it, if
the goal isn't
to make
the
text public, it is possible
to achieve whatever you want
through 2 decryptions in
the place of 1 signature
trinque: where signer is
the intended recipient of funds