169300+ entries in 0.103s

mod6: I'm confused, are you saying
that you're not interested in making a Cuntoo
then?
mod6: I just rolled in, gimme some
time
to catch up and figure out whats what.
mod6: so run on linux
then
a111: Logged on 2015-07-23 01:10 mod6: we saw stuff like
that before with
the 168`001 Verify Signature fail
too. most of
the
time it failed for us...
the
three of us who were independantly
testing it. But sometimes, it'd pass. Maybe 30% of
the
time. I was pulling my hair out.
mod6: take it easy. just asking as it was indicated
to be source of previous 168k wedge issue.
a111: Logged on 2015-07-05 05:36 assbot: Logged on 05-02-2015 00:36:21; mod6: seems
to be: 2c2314f353 VerifySignature failed ... invalid block=0000000000000a40136b height=168001
phf: until you can actually reproduce
the nature of locks patch vs. block (or whatever wedges)
phf: you replay
to 167998, you
then let it run
till 168000 on
the network. if it doesn't wedge with
that setup,
than you have
two possibilities. it is either a heisenbug, or you need
to replay
to an earlier block, say 167000 and let
that run on
the wild network, etc.
☟︎ phf: if it consistently wedges at 168000 across various machines and settings
then it's not a question of wild sewage
phf: split
the current blocks, eat block until 167998,
then on each restart copy
the 167998 state folder over
the settings folder
phf: well, if i were approaching
this, i'd replay
to 167998 or so, setup a script
to ensure
that every
time i start
trb it starts from
that state. i would
then see if on forward play it would wedge. i would
then investigate what is
the nature of wedging, and slowly instrument
the code along
the various paths
to
tell me where exactly it decides
to stop doing
the right
thing, etc.
phf: i don't remember every suggesting anything remotely similar. my suggestion would be
to debug it, and solve
the problem, rather
than "mp's fix somehow magically resolves it"
a111: Logged on 2017-03-28 04:32 asciilifeform: mod6: imho manual knobs ~for unwedging~ are a fundamental mistake. nodes shouldn't be wedgeable, period. and
the only use for a wedged node is
to learn why it wedged and
to make said scenario impossible in
the future.
phf: that's a nice round number
too, 168000
phf: i remember people wedging around
there, but i didn't personally observe it
BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> worth a comparison << Aha someone steps up
to duplicate my December 2016
to May 2017 experiment!
mod6: <+phf>
that's because you didn't
try
to simply use
the patch
to makefile
that i posted on
the list << i've had a
trb openbsd since you posted
this yes.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> zoolag live as of now at ye olde 108.31.170.49 . <<
thanks for
the update.
☟︎ trinque: so
the encrypted item is both
the hex string and what you
told
the bot
to do.
trinque: the challenge includes
the request
trinque: that yes, user has
to be careful, not automate response, inspect
the item in his hands before !!v
phf: which reminds me
that i need
to regrind my shiva swank patch, which is broken
phf: and
the most important part is
to replace -l pthread with "-Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive" which in fact should be happening on all os
phf: that's because you didn't
try
to simply use
the patch
to makefile
that i posted on
the list
phf: that memory is incorrect,
the correct memory would be of ~you~ barfing at
the
then suggestion of supporting bsd :>
☟︎ phf: tramp when it sets up remove ssh scaffolding, sends small inline scripts which defensively retranslate what emacs wants, rather
then doing "ssh foo ls"
phf: emacs for example with
their
tramp has layers of fallback (oh you don't have perl? it's ok, we'll do it with
toothpicks, but
takes 2x longer)
phf: binds bunch of keys
to "users come
to expect", including
tab completion
to ^I
a111: Logged on 2017-08-05 17:39 asciilifeform: later on i'ma pull
the drive &
try guessing
the magic params and writing'em in on other box.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-05 16:41 asciilifeform: !~later
tell lobbes should show up some
time
today or mon.
a111: Logged on 2017-08-04 23:12 asciilifeform: it dun need replacement per se, was dead disk. i
took
the downtime as chance
to
try netbsd on same iron, when new disk came. iirc i explained
this upstack.