141900+ entries in 0.087s
mircea_popescu: so apparently znort made a clean close of
teh bitbet, neh ?
mircea_popescu: patrick
thompson is more of a
tool for repeating
that sorta nonsense
than ver himself.
shinohai: I'm an entrepreneur
though .... I might one day have need for a few ded ones.
a111: Logged on 2015-12-20 17:54 asciilifeform: didn't we do a 'responsible disclosure'-is-for-idiots
thread ?
a111: Logged on 2017-11-20 01:01 mircea_popescu: now, i would much appreciate if you
took
the current bs and ipa'd it properly (it's not
THAT hard, ro ipa set is narrow and unambiguous)
mircea_popescu: it's all
there is ;
then people wrangle
themselves into a
tizzy
trying
to "fix"
the unfixable.
trinque: male filtering being lossy, females costing more
to lose biologically
mircea_popescu: exclusion is much more effectual
tool in male
than female petri dish, which is why men fight and women gossip.
mircea_popescu: not
to mention
the
top-3 men average will beat
the shit out of
the
top-5 or
top-3 women average, which is
the problem in academia.
mircea_popescu: and average doesn't have
to be higheer, at all. if five men are measured by your criteria as 12, 11, 10, 9, 8 and five women are measured 10.5, 10.4, 10.3, 10.2 and 10.1,
the female average is still way over
the male average and yet
the first
two Xs will be men.
mircea_popescu: possibly move
the average, but it's still not going
to have an impact. women alive
today compete with people alive
today not with
the previous generations
diana_coman: and
then
there are anyway
tradeoffs at all points; e.g. male stronger, yes; but generally less agile
diana_coman: to start with I'm not sure
there is such
total separation between genders as in searches in male gender means advances do not
translate further down
the line in moving up
the average on female gender
too , for instance
diana_coman: I can't say I really looked into
this; I do remember your
trilema article on
this idea re searching in
the male gender
mircea_popescu: you lower
the bar for any objective performance you will get more women qualified ; and conversely
the only way
to increase female prevalence in any activity is
to lower
the performative bar.
mircea_popescu: that's
the sadness of evo biology : if you have a sexuate species (as
the predicate)
then you will have sexual dismorfism. because if you don't, why bother with sexuation. if you have sexual dismorfism, you will have a more diverse and a less diverse gender. because
that's what dismorfism IS. if you conventionally name
the more diverse gender male (as you do) and
the less diverse gender female (as you do),
then NECESSARILY as
diana_coman: oh, it helps
to pretend for a bit longer and
then fall from
the
top of a higher cliff; is
that
the help?
diana_coman: well, it ends up hitting everyone at
that, doesn't it?
diana_coman: but yes,
that's my point: it's nothing
to do with women per se being
there; all
to do with lowering
the bar
diana_coman: dunno
the facts
there, but afaik professional cooks are still majority men, aren't
they
diana_coman: I guess you can
take "women become dominant" as visible
threshold of "everyone makes it" but
to my eyes
that's already late as it were; profession ended long
time before
that
diana_coman: mircea_popescu>
the writing is on
the wall : whenever women become dominant in [what used
to be] a profession,
that profession ends. <- more like whenever *everyone* makes it into something, it's a clear bet
that it's not anymore
the something it used
to be
mircea_popescu: there's no "ill make myself beautiful and
then win" solipsistic approach. make yourself really obedient and you'll win.
mircea_popescu: all
this aside, i'm very performance driven. i care much more about what she does
than what she looks like. which is why djb, sexy as she might be, has nevertheless 0 hot factor for me. ill behaved / stupid hotties are not hot
to any degree i can personally measure.
mircea_popescu: also,
the
testosterone issue is visible in much older women. when she was 16, noether was as much helped by
the 16 yo's boon as any other girl.
mircea_popescu: ugly-and-not-noether no. but, hard
to argue against
the company of smart chicks.
a111: Logged on 2017-06-30 21:05 asciilifeform: ( revisiting upstack: one sad irony of beelzebub :
the world-class chix, e.g. emmy noether,
tend
to be square faces.
testosterone will do
that. )
mircea_popescu: if you wait
to sharpen your fangs until you have what
to use
them on... you won't have
the
time!
mircea_popescu: explicit power relations, including rape as a definite portion of
the curricula, all
that good stuff.
mircea_popescu: education should not be available via "public" ie
tax-subsidized channels. let woman
that wants
to actually learn anything find a master and submit sexually.
jhvh1: shinohai:
The operation succeeded.
mircea_popescu: no but see, hos moar "conscientious"
than bros. 49% female faculty = 70% female campus walkers. because
they put in more hours etc.
mircea_popescu: what happened a few decades ago was
the
transition
to
the macgonagall stage, so
to speak. first clowns
take over,
then women.
mircea_popescu: so -- get ready for no moar academia, very much in liune with
trilema bull on
topic.
mircea_popescu: eg,
textile making survived for as long as weavers were men.
mircea_popescu: the writing is on
the wall : whenever women become dominant in [what used
to be] a profession,
that profession ends.
ben_vulpes: lizards dun like it when you
talk like
that mircea_popescu
mircea_popescu: let me guess, "can't find enough males willing
to support
the fantasy" ?
mircea_popescu: she's just saying a
thing. so is
this dale dougherty anon.
mircea_popescu: there's some scene in some italian film in which a woman (who is
trying
to convince a guy she believes is a movie producer
to
take her pubescent daugther
to
the movie-making place) says "sfondami
tutta". during copulation (she also offered
to hold down same daughter for defloration). she does not literally mean
that she wants him
to
tear her uterus
through her abdomen and into
the light.
mircea_popescu: "it is always wrong
to question female identity" === "oh baby give it
to me hard".
trinque: "that was offensive
to Naomi and all women" << it's a great day for canada, and
therefore
the world