log☇︎
121100+ entries in 0.072s
mod6: if it does it again, we'll take a look
mod6: <+asciilifeform> e.g. sitting and processing tx, and simply nobody gave it any new blocks ? << yes, looks this way. was heavily loading the mempool with shit
asciilifeform: ... or still verifying something, and doing nothing at all, not responding to commands, etc ?
asciilifeform: e.g. sitting and processing tx, and simply nobody gave it any new blocks ?
mod6: well, probably wasn't "stuck" just takig a long time or whatever.
asciilifeform: and fwiw i NEVER restart a node unless it actually crashed ( and it's been some yrs since last case of this ), why would you destroy valuable info re an actual-stuck eggog
mod6: in other news, got within 2 blocks of HEAD lastnight... never quite did make it... then for some reason fell like 80 blocks behind while stuck on a block.
mod6: maybe the more specific with 'a' and 'b' is the ticket tho
mod6: anyway, thing i was talking about before had: /^(--- | \+\+
asciilifeform: *if i turn
asciilifeform: what would the contrary even mean ? that the low bit is on left side of the chip , vs right ? what if it turn my comp around on the table , lol
mircea_popescu: jesus fuck this is brokeneder than originally imagined.
asciilifeform: 'bit order' does not meaningfully exist outside of serial lines, where a time parameter is imposed
mircea_popescu: are you actually saying "well mp, ~maybe~ bits exist outside of anyone looking at them, but sure as fuck they do not exist outside of bytes, as currently the situation stands" ?
phf: well, then you can't arbitrarily say that big endian system is illogical because it has little endian bit order but big endian byte order.
mircea_popescu: i can discuss bit order irrespective of the fact that systems implement byte addressing. i must.
mircea_popescu: i don't agree that implementation limits my power of representation.
phf: mircea_popescu: i don't think it makes sense to talk about bit order on any of the architectures that we're discussing, since you can only address by bytes. big endian systems could have little endian bytes and you would never know, likewise little endian systems could have big endian bytes and you would never know. logically though there's no reason you can't view big endian to be a bit reverse of little endian
BingoBoingo: Well, that everything we dig into turns into shit upon examinition show how great of a handicap not having a republic is.
mircea_popescu: i can't conceive who the fuck else was ever equipped to touch this shit.
asciilifeform: well yes. but you gotta use the подвиг радиста UI to get'em..
mircea_popescu: ah come on, the bits exist whether you're looking at them or not.
asciilifeform: unless you are that d00d in the painting
asciilifeform: there does not exist this separation, in reality, between display and ontology.
mircea_popescu: the fact that you choose to have your ide replace all ifs with :-) is your fucking problem.
mircea_popescu: but this is a problem of display not of ontology, on small endian box.
asciilifeform: sad phakt : this is also true on little-endian box -- at least if you watch the bits go over e.g. serial port.
mircea_popescu: in bigendian notation, ~SOME~ subsets of bits will be found before an equally sized subset of higher order bits and after an equally sized subset of lower order bits ; and ~SOME~ the other way ; and what the magic size cutoff is VARIES.
mircea_popescu: in smallendian notation, for every subset of bits however selected, they will be found before an equally sized subset of higher order bits and after an equally sized subset of lower order bits.
mircea_popescu: but don't you find that one's logically consistent whereas the other's logically inconsistent ?
phf: right, i'm more saying that neither have merit, and the only reason there's a narrative is because you have to have one or the other, and by nature of having both in theory you have both in practice
mircea_popescu: phf so you are actually saying that there's some kind of way to look at the situation that has both endian notations stand on equality footing ?
phf: it's a completely arbitrary decision, that has a bunch of cons and pros based on time, hardware, architecture, etc. etc. big iron used to be bigendian, micros were primarily little endian, both for reasons
phf: i find all arguments pro or cons unconvincing, as encoded by elders i nthe very name, which is a reference to gulliver's travels
asciilifeform finds that he agrees with phf : like it or not, a good % of the cheap and effective older iron that is and will remain in use in tmsr , specifically in opposition to x86ism, is big-endian.
phf: so while i think lack of bigendian will create immediate problems for people (e.g. no vdiff/vpatch on g5 machines for trinque, untill he patches it himself), i don't think it's not historically supported
mircea_popescu: the interesting point here is the mandate, ie, do you actually object to our saying "bignum is evil and get rid of it"
mircea_popescu: obviously one could patch the eucrypt to work on his box if for some reason he wants to (though i can't imagine who'd be running eulora client of ppc machine, but anyways).
phf: mircea_popescu: our current strategy with architecture support has been "it works on my machine, but if you want it to work on your machine submit a vpatch", and it's been pretty consistently applied (e.g. my openbsd patch that's been floating independently, despite never getting vpatched).
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform do a "cosmetics" at the end of the story, by then oyu'll have a proper vdiff
mircea_popescu: which is true and uninteresting!
phf: he's saying he can't fix it with any of the published vdiff's since i haven't published anything yet
asciilifeform: not with any of the currently published vdiffs
mircea_popescu: well, the new vdiff
asciilifeform: and worse, i can't even readily think of a simple pill against this inbandism.
trinque: hasn't much to do with the endian, more to do with "amount of shit bolted to side" and "recent enough to do actual work upon"
asciilifeform: but this becomes , in vdiff,
asciilifeform: and oh forfuckssake, apparently asciilifeform cannot change any of the '2017' to '2018' in ffa , because :
trinque has a 4-core g5 xserve right here he was planning to ship to bbisp
mircea_popescu: phf i am aware. do you actually want to make this an objection ?
asciilifeform still writing ch9, which is actually about this.
asciilifeform: though to be fair i have not tested sparc , so possibly there is a third...
asciilifeform: phf: phunphakt : ppc is one of the two currently-produced archs ( the other being arm ) that doesn't have constant-time MUL .
a111: Logged on 2018-01-28 15:24 mircea_popescu: in other news, to share with the group for comment : the idea is that even if we do mandate smallendian, it would still be proper to have a bitwise implementation, even were it slow, as a proper model of sorts. so it'd be both of these.
phf: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-01-28#1777688 << there's a handful of lords that are running ppc hardware, which is big endian. there's also sparc, that like ppc, is a somewhat saner cpu than x86, and that can be had for cheap for server etc. purposes ☝︎
mircea_popescu: yeah i found that too, but yes, this is a reference not the thing
a111: Logged on 2014-10-14 15:14 mircea_popescu: the entire "monsanto increases yields" fallacy is based on the fraudulent proposition that shit-tomatoes are = tomatoes.
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2014-10-14#872853 , but definitely had moar detailed thread prior ☝︎
mircea_popescu: wait till you see what passes here for pineapple.
BingoBoingo: The difference between the standard trade tomatoe here and en Estados Unidos is vast
asciilifeform: possibly was in comment thread.
mircea_popescu: i recall it as a conversation between us, you were saying something and that was my retort.
asciilifeform: suggests that it was in trilema
a111: Logged on 2014-10-15 19:56 asciilifeform: another observation re: qntra. recall mircea_popescu's point about synthetic tomatoes?
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2014-10-15#876019 << possibly prior to this mark ☝︎
mircea_popescu: but this was like 5 years ago or something like that.
mircea_popescu: me too, buyt apparently neither apples nor tomatoes not dioxin were mentioned, though i vaguely recall all three
asciilifeform: i definitely recall this
mircea_popescu: ie 0 ppm all of the various pollutants, there's no "tolerable" level.
mircea_popescu: that we were discussing current costs of items, and i said for today's crate of tomato to be compared to past's crate of tomato, it has to be biologically identical,
asciilifeform: was this the 'what if nothing could decay' thing ?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: what was the context there ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform do you happen to have a link to the original "how much would a crate of tomatoes cost" thread ?
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2018/hey-women-did-you-know-that-before-the-pantsuited-hilarity-gave-you-your-civil-rights-you-were-living-in-slavery/ << Trilema - Hey, women! Did you know that before the Pantsuited Hilarity gave you your civil rights, you were living in slavery ?
asciilifeform: very often 'too expensive' turns out -- isn't
asciilifeform: ( i dislike, on aesthetic grounds, but that's possibly just me )
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu dislikes the 'we know the constants' endianism, flip if machine's is opposite' traditional pill ?
mircea_popescu: in other news, to share with the group for comment : the idea is that even if we do mandate smallendian, it would still be proper to have a bitwise implementation, even were it slow, as a proper model of sorts. so it'd be both of these. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: diana_coman ok but not too long. one night stand!
a111: Logged on 2017-10-11 20:43 BHopkins: I think I did it right: 12taDFRdimNTHx1xoUkUZWj3nrE4js6LM6
mircea_popescu: hey, mp is willing to risk a btc on http://btcbase.org/log/2017-10-11#1724167 ☝︎
diana_coman: mircea_popescu, will schedule dreaming eulora spec machine then
asciilifeform: supposing mircea_popescu is happy to risk a coupla btc of crate 'in 1 basket'
mircea_popescu: i pay teh airfare you pay the steaks&tampons, you got yourself a[nother] vacation eh.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform so 3 of yours |AND FIVE OF MINE, this should justify the trip
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform would be an one-time thing. but hey, you get to see uruguay. it's jenuinely not bad, can go for a week, take pet on trip to bsas for a few days... the city is lovely if one doesn't mean to stay << Rocha, Cabo Polonia, and Colonia are all highly recommended by the vacationers
asciilifeform: from BingoBoingo's photos i picture a slightly shabbier buenos aires . but yes, i already have 3 crates that want to go
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform would be an one-time thing. but hey, you get to see uruguay. it's jenuinely not bad, can go for a week, take pet on trip to bsas for a few days... the city is lovely if one doesn't mean to stay
BingoBoingo: Everyone I have talked to here is a fan of the suitcase method. "when we fly to Miami everyone comes out of the woodwork with a shopping list"
mircea_popescu: speaking of which : hey diana_coman it is upon you to produce a dreamspec eulora machine nao. hit me.
asciilifeform: and even then has nonzero chance of 'hey this is the 3rd time this evil-looking gaijin is bringing 3 'personal' boxen'
asciilifeform: i suspect that the suitcase method only beats the 22% vig if 2-3 machines at a time are moved
mircea_popescu: maybe we get alf to send you his pet for a week or so. petexchange programme.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> what's wrong with fedexing it! << Box that enters the country via FEDEX is going to certainly get hit with customs and the 22% IVA. Box that comes in suitcase is almost certainly going to get waved through as a personal effect. It's a math problem of whether to pay an import duty or plane ticket.
BingoBoingo: Shipping addresses sent to those who requested it.
jhvh1: BingoBoingo: The operation succeeded.
BingoBoingo: !~later tell trinque http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/tuJma/?raw=true
jhvh1: BingoBoingo: The operation succeeded.
BingoBoingo: !~later tell asciilifeform http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/6J4NY/?raw=true
mircea_popescu: this is going to be a standard retort now, "shut up so-and-so, i bet you don't even understand hair theory!"