assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.00755 = 0.151 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 70 @ 0.00755 = 0.5285 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 5 @ 0.06099999 = 0.305 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.15 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: <kakobrekla> you know what, i think you should talk to ozbot some more. <<
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.895 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.00108501 = 1.085 BTC [-] {4}
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 213.00986, Best ask: 213.01000, Bid-ask spread: 0.00014, Last trade: 213.00986, 24 hour volume: 4358.73830996, 24 hour low: 211.02000, 24 hour high: 214.87996, 24 hour vwap: 213.03851
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1000 @ 0.00024444 = 0.2444 BTC [+] {2}
benkay: amusing that gox is still default for ticker
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 18553 @ 0.00082617 = 15.3279 BTC [+] {2}
mod6: so this guy is the gatekeeper for all BIPs? Please send all BIP-related email to <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
mod6: which, actually, im suprised there isn't any comments yet. despite mp asking for commentary...
benkay: mod6: gotta re-read it three more times.
mod6: read it for the first time about a week ago. now, re-reading after some thought.
mod6: does anyone know if TxDP "multi-signature transactions" have been implemented in bitcoind or whatever from bitcoin.org? | That page was last updated: This page was last modified on 18 January 2013, at 14:57.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 3 @ 0.897 = 2.691 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 2 @ 0.897 = 1.794 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 42 @ 0.00276056 = 0.1159 BTC [+] {3}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 77 @ 0.008 = 0.616 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.89 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 208 @ 0.00813745 = 1.6926 BTC [+] {5}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 80 @ 0.002779 = 0.2223 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 126 @ 0.00818995 = 1.0319 BTC [+] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 105 @ 0.00819 = 0.86 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4700 @ 0.00082847 = 3.8938 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 19 @ 0.00818799 = 0.1556 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 23 @ 0.008188 = 0.1883 BTC [+]
mod6: you know whats bizzare? not having to translate trilema.com from ro to en
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 78 @ 0.00818 = 0.638 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4550 @ 0.00082868 = 3.7705 BTC [+]
mod6: so as in the Lamport scheme: RNG produces 256 p & q respectively (512 hashes total), each 256 bits in size these combined are the privkey (p1->256+q1->256 )all of these together equal the privkey. and the pubkey is each of the 512 p's & q's hashed (256 bit) and concatenated together?
mod6: haha, i'd like to implement it. but i gotta make sure i have my head wrapped around it first :)
mod6: yeah, i like how simplistic it seems.
mod6: ahh, as far as leaking key part: Obviously should you reuse the same key to sign a different message you’ll be leaking key bits and eventually your key can be brokenii. << noted.
mod6: thanks for your input asciilifeform.
mod6: does this matter in the case where the dealer is a shithead?
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15200 @ 0.00082339 = 12.5155 BTC [-] {2}
mod6: damnit, you guys are smrt.
mod6: anyway, i was very intetersted in the VPSS scheme even though i'm sort of deep into implementing cramer-shoup into libgcrypt.
mod6: thought i should dig into this article & related papers.
mod6: with any luck i'll get CS working within the libgcrypt framework then can mod gnupg to utilize it.
Ademan: Dang am I happy I bought asicminer last week, that paid off really quickly
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 101 @ 0.0081 = 0.8181 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389898 BTC [+]
mod6: Each Lamport public key can only be used to sign one single message, which means many keys have to be published if many messages are to be signed. But a hash tree can be used on those public keys, publishing the top hash of the hash tree instead. This increases the size of the resulting signature, since parts of the hash tree have to be included in the signature, but it makes it possible to publish a single hash that then can be used to verify an
mod6: sound familiar? haha
mod6: are you still into urbit?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.8100096 = 8.1001 BTC [-] {3}
mod6: one of these guys has a hardon for implemeting xrp with it directly instead of btc, can't shake him.
mod6: yeah, it basically works, until they change something then you have to re-pull all source and rebuild, etc.
mod6: pretty shakey still
mod6: haha do you mean unix to be the 2nd biggest steaming turd?
mod6: what do you like better? windows?
mod6: do you prefer any specific unix flavor?
mod6: what about freebsd or openbsd?
mod6: i agree on philosophy though. why build something that is dependant on something undereath? how does that get one somewhere?
ozbot: Loper OS » You have made your bedrock, now lie in it.
mod6: i mean, the idea of a 'successor of unix' is appleaing to me, eventhough I <3 *nix (in general compared to whatever, windows). it would be amazing to have something abstracted to the level where it can handle physical systems and be virtualized too and be next gen
mod6: if it must, it will
mod6: hahaha. yah but people are creatures of habit. but thats only because it's been allowed to persist. if people were only given type A new keyboard (dvorak) then that'd be used. kinda like only left hockey sticks in soivet union.
mod6: i never personally switched to dvorak because the friend that i have who did had the issue of trying to constantly switch everyone elses computer to dvorak if he wanted to use it.
mod6: muscle memory is a bitch
mod6: i guess this might not be relevant.
mod6: so what if we got to a point where we needed to throw everything existing away (now), how we would we proceed?
mod6: we'd simply only have a lesson in what not to do.
mod6: but we wouldn't have a map in what to do, only what not to do.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2050 @ 0.00082163 = 1.6843 BTC [-]
mod6: asciilifeform: so we must go back to the form of the turing machine or DFA to re-invent the modern os? or do you think even that must be re-thought because of the possibility of quantum computers?
mod6: ( i like this thread, even if it leads no-where in particular. just curious, searching for ideas. )
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 103 @ 0.05263204 = 5.4211 BTC [+] {3}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 10 @ 0.05260001 = 0.526 BTC [-]
mod6: ahh i see your comment and reply in that article: I believe that efficiency in computer design is a false god. Give me an “inefficient” but responsive and “Seven-Laws Compliant” computer any day of the week in place of the monstrous PC, that race car which regards steering wheel input as mere advice and so eagerly speeds off cliffs and into embankments. << hahaha
mod6: i agree, there has to be a better way.
mod6: anyway, i guess i'll get back to it. thanks for the convo.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.8795995 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 14 @ 0.0079 = 0.1106 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 912 @ 0.00082163 = 0.7493 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 10 @ 0.87963928 = 8.7964 BTC [+] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 111 @ 0.007909 = 0.8779 BTC [+] {3}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 3 @ 0.15 = 0.45 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389898 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.389899 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 6 @ 0.0599 = 0.3594 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 105 @ 0.00814571 = 0.8553 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 6 @ 0.80173333 = 4.8104 BTC [-] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 16 @ 0.00815 = 0.1304 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5750 @ 0.00081943 = 4.7117 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 40 @ 0.00765473 = 0.3062 BTC [-] {4}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6037 @ 0.00081794 = 4.9379 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 304 @ 0.00109498 = 0.3329 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 500 @ 0.00109498 = 0.5475 BTC [-]
gribble: Current Blocks: 267686 | Current Difficulty: 3.9092878763808584E8 | Next Difficulty At Block: 268127 | Next Difficulty In: 441 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 2 days, 5 hours, 43 minutes, and 33 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 511949177.601 | Estimated Percent Change: 30.95714
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4033 @ 0.00081943 = 3.3048 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 3 @ 0.8 = 2.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 16424 @ 0.00081844 = 13.4421 BTC [-] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 108 @ 0.00765194 = 0.8264 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 136 @ 0.00762073 = 1.0364 BTC [-] {3}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11383 @ 0.00082169 = 9.3533 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] [PAID] 0.69348300 BTC to 1`386`966 shares, 50 satoshi per share
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 179 @ 0.00273072 = 0.4888 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.15 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 30 @ 0.0078 = 0.234 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77000005 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 15 @ 0.75933333 = 11.39 BTC [-] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 105 @ 0.0076502 = 0.8033 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 108 @ 0.00765009 = 0.8262 BTC [-] {4}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 96 @ 0.0076501 = 0.7344 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2000 @ 0.00082101 = 1.642 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 2000 @ 0.00109498 = 2.19 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 11800 @ 0.00081929 = 9.6676 BTC [-] {2}
Diablo-D3: Ukyo: hey, at some point can you delist DMC? the nov 1st deadline has passed
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 628 @ 0.00109 = 0.6845 BTC [-]
Ukyo: what does the us user deadline have to do with DMC ?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 37 @ 0.00762 = 0.2819 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 179 @ 0.0072901 = 1.3049 BTC [-] {5}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [NEOBEE] 100 @ 0.002779 = 0.2779 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 100 @ 0.00109498 = 0.1095 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6600 @ 0.00081632 = 5.3877 BTC [-]
gribble: KRS1 was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 11 hours, 3 minutes, and 42 seconds ago: <KRS1> lul
nubbins`: ;;later tell KRS1 professionally, i've coded in VB.NET, C#, java, objective-c, plus web-dev-related things like html/xml, js, and sql
nubbins`: i actually have no idea how ;;later tell works, you know
nubbins`: and as a further response, i'd sooner put my eyes out than work in IT again
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.77 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 3 @ 0.77000005 = 2.31 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 34 @ 0.00779982 = 0.2652 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.8 BTC [+]
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 217.10102, Best ask: 217.68451, Bid-ask spread: 0.58349, Last trade: 217.10102, 24 hour volume: 5123.54629150, 24 hour low: 211.25000, 24 hour high: 218.00000, 24 hour vwap: 215.26331
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD last: 218.00001, vol: 5143.70604610 | Bitstamp BTCUSD last: 206.20, vol: 6099.18382697 | BTC-E BTCUSD last: 203.112, vol: 6443.37397 | Bitfinex BTCUSD last: 215.0, vol: 2431.08005992 | CampBX BTCUSD last: 199.00, vol: 188.94107072 | BTCChina BTCUSD last: 213.1181982, vol: 7764.44100000 | Volume-weighted last average: 210.280682296
nubbins`: AM1 made it all the way to 0.88 earlier, i guess people are really expecting a lot of suckers to buy those new box erupters or whatever they're called
Jere_Jones: I'm not even sure those are new. Sounds suspiciously like 3 blades in a box to me.
nubbins`: priced suspiciously like 3 blades in a box, too
nubbins`: same bad idea with a different pretty bow on it
Jere_Jones: Don't get me wrong, I want ASICMiner to succeed. But I don't think the box is news.
nubbins`: i'm ambivalent about their success
nubbins`: do you want the banks who offered sub-prime mortgages to succeed?
nubbins`: take a moment to examine the parallels
Jere_Jones: In both cases, I believe my answer would be yes. Because my financial well-being is related to both.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 20 @ 0.71795 = 14.359 BTC [-] {8}
Jere_Jones: I'm not *happy* about needing BoA to not fail. But I would be in a bad spot if it did.
nubbins`: i don't think that many of the people bleating in the AM threads on btctalk have the same level of clarity
nubbins`: in fact, if one were to suggest to them that they're attempting to enrich themselves to the direct detriment of others, they'd proably be very surprised
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 63 @ 0.00729051 = 0.4593 BTC [-]
Jere_Jones: Let's be clear, I don't want BoA to succeed *because* they are issuing mortgages to people who can't afford them. I want BoA to succeed *because* they have my money.
Jere_Jones: And, as far as I can tell, there aren't any real good options when it comes to banks.
nubbins`: there's always credit unions, i guess
nubbins`: although i think the banking system in america is very different from here in canada.
nubbins`: we've got what, five or six banks? and a bunch of credit unions
Jere_Jones: We've got a ton of banks and they all suck.
Jere_Jones: Of course, the vast majority of them are really just fronts for the big ones. Switching to one of them would be the equivalent of switching from Sprint to Ting.
nubbins`: and the oppressor grows larger still
ozbot: Look what came in the mail today. : Bitcoin
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 230 @ 0.00727665 = 1.6736 BTC [-] {4}
truffles: if only that bitcoin thing could be used as money
truffles: " a bitcoin condom machine.." that was a good one
nubbins`: there was a guy selling pregnancy tests on the forum
truffles: not that many women on the internet
truffles: oh wait nerds can has gf too nm
truffles: is nerd a negative word to nerds ?
truffles: i personally dont consider myself one ldo
pankkake: it's probably like nigga. nerds can say nerd
truffles: well some ppl like showing off their knowledge like on "king of the nerds" tv show
truffles: n word not on the same scale imo
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1500 @ 0.0002445 = 0.3668 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 1000 @ 0.0002445 = 0.2445 BTC [+]
truffles: well im not smart enough for the nerd title otherwise i see no probs with it, but ofc some ppl are sensitive about this stuff
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 246 @ 0.00109498 = 0.2694 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 360 @ 0.00109498 = 0.3942 BTC [+]
benkay: nubbs how do you obtain food credits outside of IT these days?
nubbins`: printed them, yes. didn't design the image
benkay: bought some cardanos, kakobrekla?
nubbins`: ah! you must be one of the slovenia/slovakia packages i'm guessing?
kakobrekla: nubbins` yeah that one, somalia it was i reckon
benkay: i'm still mulling over how to integrate cardanos into my existing key mgmt scheme
nubbins`: i'm much more interested in flatstock than fabric these days
kakobrekla: benkay yeah ill get one or two and then later figure out what to do with them
nubbins`: received a large order of paper on friday, can't wait to start testing it out
nubbins`: all 100% cotton. some of it is black :0
nubbins`: yep. acid-free, archival quality
nubbins`: none of this dead-tree bullshit ;)
nubbins`: no more so than the average sensible human
nubbins`: maybe so, but it makes fine paper
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 220.00000, Best ask: 220.09774, Bid-ask spread: 0.09774, Last trade: 220.00000, 24 hour volume: 7213.48975184, 24 hour low: 211.70001, 24 hour high: 220.09774, 24 hour vwap: 216.59082
kakobrekla: stamp is laging, not only teh cans and strings but teh price too
mod6: nice chart. someone has a pretty good bid in @ 195 on bitstamp.
mod6: well, guess its $193.03:
mod6: $193.03 3619.12508000 $698,599.71
nubbins`: never gonna get filled, that's just there to give people confidence that the ass isn't gonna fall out of it
pankkake: ken mislead people? how surprising
Pantoo: i was looking to see if he had said anything else about the SEC and noticed he made that update earlier. wonder how long till others notice
ozbot: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 2 @ 0.78899999 = 1.578 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 8 @ 0.059 = 0.472 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 3500 @ 0.00109498 = 3.8324 BTC [+] {2}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9900 @ 0.00081266 = 8.0453 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 5 @ 0.059 = 0.295 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9450 @ 0.00081336 = 7.6863 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9074 @ 0.0008163 = 7.4071 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [B] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.00109498 = 1.095 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9000 @ 0.00081258 = 7.3132 BTC [-] {2}
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 130 @ 0.00728141 = 0.9466 BTC [-] {3}
jurov: nubbins`: did you declare sufficiently high value for our watchful customs to intercept it and demand ransom?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 63 @ 0.0072744 = 0.4583 BTC [-]
nubbins`: the postal clerk filled out all the customs forms for me. pretty sure they're all marked as "t-shirt", gift, no cash value
jurov: good. cuz americans like, in their blessed innocece, to declare $$$$ value and then it's headache
nubbins`: i sold some poor EU guy a rare casascius coin a while back. he insisted on insuring it for its full value, and was very sad when he had to pay hundreds of dollars before they released his package
pankkake: that's why I don't like to order stuff outside of the EU :/
pankkake: also stuff has a tendency to disappear at the border
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 31 @ 0.00759999 = 0.2356 BTC [+]
nubbins`: mircea_popescu: just finished; we're *all* misrepresenting the situation. the artists, the art dealers, the museum-going public, and every single person who commented on that post, yourself included. this is why "what is art" is an interesting topic for discussion; everyone colors it with their own experience.
mircea_popescu: you know this because i can enact my point in your system, but you can't enact your point in mine.
mircea_popescu: in all situations where a set of representations appears equivalent but one excludes all others, that's also the correct one, and the others are degenerate.
nubbins`: i'm still trying to figure out if i should determine the nature of your point or the nature of your system first!
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 0.775 BTC [-]
nubbins`: anyway, certainly one of the more entertaining reads (article + comments) so far
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 5 @ 0.77999998 = 3.9 BTC [+] {2}
ozbot: By special request, the Imperial March on Kazoo - YouTube
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 7 @ 0.7931355 = 5.5519 BTC [+] {4}
nubbins`: a reasonable enough representation
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CBTC] 5899 @ 0.00021142 = 1.2472 BTC [-] {9}
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 826 @ 0.00081437 = 0.6727 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 17 @ 0.059 = 1.003 BTC [+]
jurov: the correct one, and the others are degenerate *rolls eyes*
nubbins`: i'm curious to know what your description of my system would be
nubbins`: nope, that was directed towards you
nubbins`: you can't claim to know a man's mind and not expect him to ask you to elaborate
mircea_popescu: ah. well i wouldn't know "your" system. what you've written so far is coherent with naive nominalism, ie the ideology of all youths. occam requires it be described as such.
mircea_popescu: (naive nominalism is the view that convention enacts existence, and thus forumers are "ceo"s and their harebrained schemes "companies")
mircea_popescu: that aside, there aren't really enough points given explicitly to make much of a call.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 60 @ 0.00726548 = 0.4359 BTC [-] {3}
nubbins`: and thus, random bozos are "artists"?
nubbins`: if the random bozo creates something that i like, what else would i call him?
mircea_popescu: but there's a difference between calling a dude a nigger for convenience, as the shortest word available,
nubbins`: i dunno, man. maybe i'm applying too much of my interpretation of your "system" into your words, but it seems like you're flat-out stating that it's not art unless someone in a position of power or influence over the artist decrees it to be so
nubbins`: and i find such a stance so bizarre that i'm not even sure where to begin picking it apart
nubbins`: about five years ago, i moved into an apartment and found a large piece of wall panelling with a picture painted on the back side of it. it's currently gracing the wall of my living room.
nubbins`: no name, no identifying marks whatsoever, no way for me to ever find out who made it or to contact them in any way
nubbins`: to propose that i hold any position relative to its creator, above or below, is simply nonsense
nubbins`: and yet, there it sits on my wall
nubbins`: unequivocally and inarguably a work of art
mircea_popescu: "unequivocally and inarguably a work of art" only in the republic of one constructed by your own living room, of which you are president.
mircea_popescu: why do you expect solipsism to be considered by others ?
mircea_popescu: for that matter, you may perhaps in time come to own a miniature of the eiffel tower, which you may emplace on your commode,
mircea_popescu: it'd be "the eiffel tower of my commode", but only inasmuch as you are concerned.
mircea_popescu: it's not germane to call it "the eiffel tower" in conversation.
nubbins`: well, you're the one bringing definite articles into play
nubbins`: it's not THE art on my walls, it's A piece of art
mircea_popescu: not whatever irreelvant stuff you're personally dreaming up all for yourself.
mircea_popescu: the eiffel tower on yoru commode is not a piece of eiffel towers.
nubbins`: everything is irrelevant but the opinion of the observer
nubbins`: but as a matter of determining whether it's art, yes
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3216 @ 0.00081476 = 2.6203 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: there are qualifications needed to be an observer. you don't become an observer of the battle of thermopylae just by stating yourself as an observer
nubbins`: an observer needs no qualifications beyond the ability to observe
nubbins`: the validity of their observations can certainly be debated
mircea_popescu: this may be the best stating of the naive nominalism discussed above.
nubbins`: just as the validity of what my opinion of art is can be debated
nubbins`: you touched on this when you said it was inert
nubbins`: but that's just another way of questioning whether an event happens if there is no observer
nubbins`: trees falling, noises being made, etc
nubbins`: and that's fair in the sense that art is some sort of schrodinger's cat type thing
nubbins`: where it's neither art nor not-art until someone looks at it
mircea_popescu: nah, see, the equivocation at work here is that the requirements for being an observer in the foresrt with a falling tree are very low
nubbins`: but the difference here is that all can agree on whether or not a cat is dead
mircea_popescu: one can't turn arround and expect all situations have equally low bars
nubbins`: none can agree on whether or not X is art
nubbins`: because it's simply not quantifiable
nubbins`: how many arts is Starry Night? how many arts is Fountain?
mircea_popescu: nubbins` i dunno what cats have to do with this. is it an internet thing ?
dexX7: fringe is a us tv series
nubbins`: due to quantum physics gibberish, the cat is neither dead nor alive until observed
nubbins`: the natural extrapolation of your argument is that you can walk up to a woman weeping at the beauty of a painting, or of a spoken word, and politely inform her that what she has observed is, in fact, not art
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 6 @ 0.15 = 0.9 BTC [-]
nubbins`: but the very fact that she weeps implies that she is having a strong emotional response to it
nubbins`: which in turn implies that she
mircea_popescu: nubbins` you could slap her, or kidnap her to the same strong emotional response
mircea_popescu: more's the point : your example is counterfactual. i would never talk to some anodyne serf woman,
nubbins`: and there are those who would argue that such a kidnapping is "performance art"
mircea_popescu: you might as well propose the cancer walk in the front door one day and begin jacking off.
nubbins`: i disagree, but my disagreement merely illustrates my point
nubbins`: i'm merely offering the simplest explanation for the fact that there are so many things which some people call art and other people don't
mircea_popescu: incidentally, the miscasting as art as "that which yields emotional response" is roughly the reason trolling has become such a big deal culturally.
mircea_popescu: nubbins` yes, but your explanation requires people be equal and interchangeable, which is beyond naive.
mircea_popescu: you might as well offer an explanation of art for spherical chickens that live in vacuums.
nubbins`: your explanation requires that some higher power declares X to be art and Y to be not-art
nubbins`: suppose person X says "this sculpture i've commissioned is art" and person Y says "nay, you are my subject, and i declare it to be not-art"
nubbins`: well, obviously person Z (X and Y's superior) should be the REAL person to ask, right?
nubbins`: and you arrive at the conclusion that art is declared by edict from god
nubbins`: or, y'know, occam's razor. it's art if i think it's art.
nubbins`: the obvious implication is that the words "to me" are inserted between "art" and "if"
mircea_popescu: except no one cares about any "to me" sentence. they're voiceless.
nubbins`: because there's no other way to quantify it, and if you can't quantify things, you certainly can't classify them
nubbins`: sure, but what does that change?
mircea_popescu: looky, this trick where you go "mpex is too hard, i don;'t understand it ; therefore we must all glbse because there's no other way to do it" isn't logically sound.
mircea_popescu: it is the avatar of youth, but so are many other illogical topoi
nubbins`: someone says a piss pot "is art to me". i don't care, because whether it's art to them has no bearing on whether it's art to me
mircea_popescu: the "to me" approach is unsound. this disqualifies it, perpetually and definitively.
mircea_popescu: the remainder is the "to whom ?" approach, which reduces to social hierarchy.
nubbins`: art acts on people. without "to me", it does not exist
mircea_popescu: you presume all action is with the voluntary subjection fo the subject
mircea_popescu: this may be true, but the subjection needn't be conscious.
mircea_popescu: you don't discuss surgery in terms of the subjective impressions of patients. a similar discussion of any other craft is similarly out of place.
mircea_popescu: obviously the surgeons are surgeons by decree rather than because "people" feel surgeonized by them
nubbins`: surgery definitely falls into the realm of the quantifiable.
mircea_popescu: only in the minds of people who have no idea what it is.
nubbins`: "you're cured if i say you're cured"
nubbins`: "it's art if i tell you it's art"
nubbins`: "i'm cured if my condition is gone"
mircea_popescu: does the oncology patient go "all is well doc, i feel cured" ?
nubbins`: "cured" has nothing to do with feeling
mircea_popescu: it's quite a case of "you're cured if and when i say you're cured".
mircea_popescu: when i say "it's art because X feels Y" i may be right. when you say "it's art because I feel Y" you're certain to be wrong.
nubbins`: mp says it's art because nubbins wept, vs nubbins says it's art because nubbins wept
nubbins`: same conclusion, different route
mircea_popescu: mp said it's art, and it makes nubbins weep, vs nubbins thinks it;'s art because that's why he thinks he wept
mircea_popescu: these are not the same. and for that matter the latter's logically unsound.
nubbins`: you changed your example a bit there
nubbins`: you went from "because x feels y" to "and x feels y"
nubbins`: mp said it's art because it makes nubbins weep, or mp said it's art and it makes nubbins weep?
mircea_popescu: there is no because in the correct statement. in fact, we can judge how good a nubbins you are by how adequately you weep when art is presented
mircea_popescu: NOT the other way around, judge art by how it "makes" you weep or not.
nubbins`: well, obviously it's not the art but nubbins himself that is the cause of the weeping
mircea_popescu: this naive "man at center of everything" goes well with the naive nominalism, but it's quite as nutty.
nubbins`: let's examine "mp said it's art"
nubbins`: sure. nevertheless, we can presume that he does
nubbins`: we can also presume that nubbins also has criteria
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24950 @ 0.00081405 = 20.3105 BTC [-] {2}
nubbins`: as a facile counterpoint, why not?
nubbins`: surely there must be something that makes mp a good judge and nubbins a poor one?
mircea_popescu: mp is one of the lords. he makes art be. of course we can presume anything.
mircea_popescu: nubbins is no such lord. we're going to have to explain why we presume.
mircea_popescu: <nubbins`> surely there must be something that makes mp a good judge and nubbins a poor one? << this implies that perhaps nubbins could move upwards in society, and contains implicit an equivalency of substance between the two. this isn't an accepted point between us.
nubbins`: ^ this implies that there's a ladder we're both on and you're above me on it
nubbins`: so if it's true, you'll have to prove it.
nubbins`: so you pop into someone's house, point to a painting, and say "actually that's not art at all", and thus it was never art
mircea_popescu: i pop into someone's house by the intermediate agency of his wife which is now my slave
mircea_popescu: and she throws out all their old shit cause now she knows better.
nubbins`: that could happen without any outside influence
nubbins`: and indeed it does, all the fucking time
nubbins`: in fact, it even happens in the other direction!
nubbins`: "hey, y'know, this album is actually pretty good"
nubbins`: "this drawing has really grown on me"
mircea_popescu: but this has little to do. you were discussing a particular application of the theory, with what i took as a view to reduce it to absurd.
mircea_popescu: i've shown the approach not to really work, we can move on
nubbins`: of course, absurdity is a spectrum
nubbins`: the entire sphere of art rests squarely on the more
mircea_popescu: the curse of this particular equalitarian-nominalism ogre is that it can't really make stateemnts.
nubbins`: well, obviously, if you take my view, all art is a bit of a beat-off
nubbins`: if one chooses to make himself an authority in such an arena, well, so be it
nubbins`: but he deceives himself if he thinks he can avoid becoming part of the beat-off
nubbins`: after all, what's a bigger beat-off than "i'm the guy who sez what's art and what's not"?
nubbins`: it's enough to make your sides ache.
mircea_popescu: you know that seinfeld episode when george is pitching to the network nubbins ?
nubbins`: vague recollection, specifics are lost in the haze
mircea_popescu: "so what's this idea ?" "it's nothing" "Then why am I watching it ?" "because it's on tv" "not yet."
nubbins`: you wanna air a tv show, you need the permission of your master
nubbins`: you wanna paint something or write a song, you're limited only by your own level of ambition
mircea_popescu: but this sort of drawer novel, as it was known, doesn't exist in the sense of art.
mircea_popescu: it exists in the sense of masturbation, or w/e the author does in his privacy.
nubbins`: so it's art if it reaches an audience of a certain size
mircea_popescu: think of an old painting being discovered in a stahs. what is the question first and foremost asked ? is it something as to the paionting itself or is it as to the pedigree of the owner ?
mircea_popescu: nobody goes "i found a 500 year old kinda cool painting"
mircea_popescu: it only matters once it becomes "an old da vinci has been discovered"
mircea_popescu: audience has nothing to do with it. this is wholly a medieval-inspired problem of probatory.
nubbins`: it matters to more people if it's an old davinci or what have you
mircea_popescu: if the shipwreck survivor found is a noble or a peasant, not if he owns a lot of farms and what havd you
nubbins`: but that doesn't preclude it mattering to anyone
mircea_popescu: well the advantage of holding nonsense views (which utopianisms are by definiton) is that anything can be derived from them.
mircea_popescu: any conclusion is available to the inconsistent set of premises.
nubbins`: the magazines at the grocery store tell me that kim kardashian is very worthy of my attention, but that's simply false
nubbins`: what's more nonsense than debating whether or not something is art?
nubbins`: or whether or not X or Y is a criteria for defining it?
mircea_popescu: art is art. you disagree, you may be punished by your lord. end of story.
nubbins`: or whether person X or person Y is an authority on the subject?
nubbins`: unadulterated nonsense, all of it
mircea_popescu: so if you don't really wish to discuss art, why are you ?
nubbins`: regardless of a self-appointed lord's opinion
nubbins`: if i didn't wish to discuss it, i wouldn't. this is great.
nubbins`: you assume that people don't wish to discuss nonsense
nubbins`: the length of this exchange implies otherwise
mircea_popescu: lol no, you can't "Discuss" nonsense. to discuss a topic you have to renounce nonsense.
mircea_popescu: if you wish to wallow in nonsense you're stuck doing it by yourself
mircea_popescu: whether you get some others to do the same in your general proximity is irrelevant, everyone's still doing it by himself.
nubbins`: nonsense. you've been talking nonsense with me for like two hours.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.38989799 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 9 @ 0.059 = 0.531 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 16 @ 0.007265 = 0.1162 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 24 @ 0.00726401 = 0.1743 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 44 @ 0.00725763 = 0.3193 BTC [-] {2}