97900+ entries in 0.062s
a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 16:08 esthlos: now for your comments: getting rid of
the defpackage was a bad oversight, no real reason. My guess why gpg is failing is because I'm using 2.2.4 while I
think most of you guys use 1.x . Moving
to 1.x is on my backlog, but it was deprioritized becasue I didn't want
to spend
the
time converting my keys. Another oversight, I suppose
mod6: let's
take
the rockchip discussion into #pizarro
mod6: is it specifically about
the rockchip? or v?
douchebag: would anyone mind chatting with me via PM so I don't shit up
the logs asking questions about how
to get everything on
this gentoo box sorted? I have minimal expereince working with gentoo so I have quite a few questions
a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 16:03 esthlos: if I need
to be able
to respond within a day
to work with you guys, I will do my best
to change
things around
esthlos: ah
true, no point in generating flow for antecedents, etc
mod6: well, not always based on flow, but it might be, depending on
the operation, otherwise
the map is used
to
traverse, sometimes.
esthlos: yep mod6,
that's effectively what I'll be doing.
mod6: for instance, my
thing basically checks all people in
the current wot,
then verifies
the seals based upon
the current wot,
then build a map, from which I build a flow.
then all operations
take place fro mthat.
esthlos: ok, and
to
that point, should EVERY operation spitting out vpatches (flow, antecedents, and so on) check all vpatches for sig?
mod6: yes, should error immediately.
thats what mine does anyway.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-03 20:19 mod6: Don't be like me, set your system
time, first
thing, diana_coman.
mod6: Do
that,
then
try again.
mod6: Did you ever set
the system
time?
mod6: for god sake man, please, just learn how
to use p.bvulpes.com.
mod6: WoT is what happens
to you while you're busy making other plans.
douchebag: Forsure, I should have got
to working on
this earlier. I've just been incredibly busy lately with finals for college, work, and preparing
to move overseas in about 2.5 weeks
mod6: douchebag: you just happen
to be
the first one.
That's all, could have been anyone.
mod6: He'll let us know, which is fine. But overall, it's best
to
try
to get a clear understanding of how
to handle
these now.
douchebag: But right now I'm setting up nginx + php + mysql on
the bbox
mod6: I agree, which why, if you read above, I'm posing
the question
to our customer, mircea_popescu.
diana_coman: mod6, you do have a say; but you have your say with
the one paying for
the box!
mod6: So, what we're saying
then is, if someone rents a box for someone else, and
that someone else gets neg-rated,
then it's up
to
the renter
to figure it out? What if
the renter says, "hey fuck what pizarro and its customers
think". Does Pizarro not have a say in it's own customer usage
then?
a111: Logged on 2018-05-03 18:30 mircea_popescu: but logically, would you really want
to rent your garage
to anyone ANY of your friends
think is no good ?
BingoBoingo: <mod6> could have been you, renting it for person X. Person X is under your wing, so
to speak. << At your mercy is more like it
BingoBoingo: <mod6> diana_coman: i simply mean, mircea_popescu rented
the
thing for
the guy. 'tis all. << MP rented
the
thing because
the guy can't
mod6: could have been you, renting it for person X. Person X is under your wing, so
to speak.
BingoBoingo: If you have been disenfranchised,
the case is
that yes, you have
to have others do
thing for you because you can't (MP in
the case of leasing
the rockchip douchebag uses)
mod6: diana_coman: i simply mean, mircea_popescu rented
the
thing for
the guy. 'tis all.
☟︎ mod6: This is all why
this discussion is needed. Because it's a pretty inflexible rule, as it stands.
BingoBoingo: mod6: But in
the case
the negrated fellow isn't leasing
the chip. MP is.
diana_coman: well yes, but first and foremost: what does it meant
then "it's X's person"?
mod6: Pizarro shall follow
the rule and remove access
to
that scammer. Simple as
that.
diana_coman: then you go and
talk
to mircea_popescu , yes
mod6: This is overall dubious
then. If someone scams me, and I neg-rate
them, but
their mircea_popescu's person in question,
then what?
☟︎ BingoBoingo: If I recall it was MP
that rented
the rockchip for douchebag.
☟︎ diana_coman: mod6, my reading is
that pizarro does business with mp here
though, not with douchebag
mod6: douchebag: scroll up, said somethings, or just check
the log
diana_coman: lobbes,
there is no positive cancels negative; for starters, it's not a sum
mod6: Read
that log post
that I pasted above.
That is
the current rule.
mod6: but
this is strictly un-republican, and un-verified.
mod6: in a pinch -- you could always
try
to just : `patch -F 0 -E -p1 < mp-wp_genesis.vpatch` in some directory and just inflate
the
thing.
mod6: so douchebag: nope
that's not working, if it fails like
that, just blow away your press dir, whatever is
there is no good.
mod6: hanbot: how are you currently pressing mpwp, what
tools should douchebag use for
this?
mod6: this is what brought on
the whole
thing about phf doing his v stuffs or whatever.
mod6: yeah, my v doesn't work with
that
thing.
mod6: When you see it in
the flow,
then you should be good.
Then you'll have
to do : ./v.pl p v mpwp mp-wp_genesis.vpatch pd mpwp sd .mpwp-seals
☟︎ BingoBoingo: I assume she was hit while wandering aimlessly in
traffic as
the zombies
tend
to do here
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 03:43 mircea_popescu: if
that guy's not wearing brown underwear now...
mod6: or whatever you named
the different seals dir.
mod6: then
the command would be like: ./v.pl f pd mpwp sd .mpwp-seals
mod6: cause you will need
that.
mod6: crud, one sec. im guessing you have a separate .seals dir for
the mpwp vpatch
too right?
douchebag: it ran
the command, no output. going
to
try verbose
mod6: see what it
tells you
mod6: ok
try
this: ./v.pl f pd mpwp
danielpbarron: i don't know exacts, but you were
talking back
to me over in lrh around
the same
time you were polluting snr in here, and my +1 was preventing others from !!downing you
mod6: I would say, focus on
trinque's
task list.
Then read back on
the other neg ratings given and see if some repair can be done
to your wot-status.
douchebag: danielpbarron: what's
the exact reason you negrated me?
danielpbarron: i'm not married
to
the rating, will consider arguments
danielpbarron: looks like mp and lobbes more
than balance it out
though. +2 from each
trinque: and douchebag, sounds like you have another lord from whom
to ask forgiveness; pizarro account is still in peril
mod6: Depends on
the audience maybe.
douchebag: If I'm going
to run a blog, wouldn't it make sense
to have a domain name
that's easy
to remember?
danielpbarron: i also have him at -1 for mouthing off
to me in
the eftard channel
douchebag: do you guys
think douchebag.press is a good domain name?
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-03-29 14:37 mircea_popescu: anyway, whadda ya
think mod6 , can we get him back
to positive rating ?
a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 18:16 mod6: Because I don't want us
to ever ask someone about
things such as
this;
their rating of someone.
a111: Logged on 2018-05-03 18:27 mod6: anyone? or any
TMSR lord?
lobbes: re wot: I mean,
the serenity of leveraging
the wot, imho, is
that it is a purely individual-to-individual
thing by design. In
this case, you have Pizarro (P) who has customer relationships with MP and D. D has been negrated by
T on
the basis of
Tx. MP can either decide 1)
Tx means enough
to request P get rid of D, in which case P now determines if it values MP or D moar, or 2) MP decides
Tx does not mean enough
to request P get rid of D.
mod6: What is it complainig about? Btw, I'm not sure
that
this projct even works with my version of V.
douchebag: No, I'm
trying
to figure out what I'm doing wrong right now
douchebag: right now, I just
threw
that up so
that I have something at least
☟︎ douchebag: I need
to get a domain now, and get mpwp setup
mod6: Alright, sounds good
trinque.
trinque: mod6: means from where my butt sits, if it's
tomorrow, I pull
the
trigger. so get crackin
trinque: mod6:
the example's illustrated for logs, and now e can discuss it
trinque: douchebag:
tomorrow comes and no post, negrated and
that's
that.
mod6: Well... see,
this is not really how it should be. Don't let ole mod6
talk ya down.
trinque: mod6: since his remedy involves access
to a place
to post
the report, I'll give it until
the end of
the day, which is ample
time
to get a blog up and a post (even incomplete, so what) up.
☟︎ mod6: And what I should have said is: In light of
the douchebag being neg-rated by a someone, a
TMSR~ Lord especially, douchebag will be removed from access.
This may change if his status changes.
trinque: mod6: I don't mean
there's an actual contract, just referencing
the notion of "cure period"
trinque: because dick-pulling comes before
the republic. immature bullshit
to be weeded out.
☟︎ a111: Logged on 2018-05-20 03:43 douchebag: Alright, I can have
that done in
the next week or so. I'm currently using
the rockchip box
to host a webpage
to
troll someone, so I want
the lulz
there
to continue
to it's full potential
mod6: Because I don't want us
to ever ask someone about
things such as
this;
their rating of someone.
☟︎ mod6: Was just
trying
to avoid (perhaps stupidly) some Pizarro gyrations.
mod6: There is no contract here. I don't want
to ask anyone about
their ratings. Perhaps I shouldn't have asked what I asked
there above.
☟︎