95100+ entries in 0.904s

mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes: this suggests a novel attack vector: depress price strategically to drive miners out, <<< except miners don't go in and out with the price. the market is amortisation driven, they have the gear and have to use it, so they'll use it.
mircea_popescu: pete
_dushenski: it's completely wild to see how much the bitcoin network hashrate fluctuates. << you understand those aren't directly measured, but more like calculated after the fact ? it's normal variance, you're trying to guess how many times a coin is tossed by how many heads you see. well...
☟︎ cazalla: mircea
_popescu, i remember hearing about this kid, nfi if he actually was part of lulzsec or not
thickasthieves: <+mircea
_popescu> being a miner is notoriously a "nobody's business" type of affair. there's nothing to be gained really. /// well, what if we picture the future 10 years out? are representatives of large hash more communicative? or is there 'political' position on bitcoin technicals more known?
mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes no dude, it's a pos libtard venue astroturfing the shit out of the internet.
pete_dushenski: ben
_vulpes as opposed to... lol crafting your own based on imaginary spec?
fluffypony: pete
_dushenski: at present value, yes :-P
fluffypony: pete
_dushenski: I'm going to be in LA from next Tue till Nov 2nd, and then in Utah & Las Vegas from Nov 2nd to Nov 17th - any chance you're mosying on down in that vicinity?
thestringpuller: ben
_vulpes: lol i wish i had that kind of budget << instead of paying for college pay for full time tutor for 4 years?
thestringpuller: pete
_dushenski> it feels like bitcoin is accelerating that process!
thestringpuller: old pete
_dushenski will one day think like Jeezy, "Seen't it all"
pete_dushenski: mircea
_popescu: romania was for a while on par with somalia. << but romania got "aid"
thestringpuller: pete
_dushenski: if we were still on gold standard, China could just dump gold and cause a collapse
pete_dushenski: mircea
_popescu: this is also quite right. either russia or china can in fact raise interest rates causing a collapse. << their own rates? or just dump some us bonds and trigger us rate increase?
pete_dushenski: mircea
_popescu: a quarter bn in 2014 ? seriously ? all into shit ? << lol. tip of the derpberg.
pete_dushenski: mircea
_popescu i'll repent by updating my "how to run a node" article with ben
_vulpes' final work :)
ben_vulpes: provided set
_lk
_max
_locks type configs are in place?
mircea_popescu: there is one caveat, specifically, that you must make a file named DB
_CONFIG that contains a set
_lg
_dir database set
_lk
_max
_locks 500000
mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes anyway, i'll pass you a signed tarball tomorrow ?
mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes i suppose "first otc rating" would be better way to go about it no ?
ben_vulpes: <mircea
_popescu> 0.5.6rc3 works << enhanced sync speed?
artifexd: <mircea
_popescu> how the fuck it is code never shrinks ? << Code does shrink sometimes. But not due to concentration on features or bugs. If it happens, it happens because the developer grows and improves. One of my favorite days was deleting 60k lines of code that I had written and replacing it with 100 lines. Simpler. Faster. Easier to understand.
pete_dushenski: mircea
_popescu lol will do. i remember that article well.
mircea_popescu: <ben
_vulpes> <mircea
_popescu> anyway, the consensus seems to be 6.3 ? << i've yet to hear a compelling argument for anything past 0.5.3 << ok, so 5.4
mod6: ben
_vulpes: so the main issue was the deps so far. i went to the deb site and it gave me some to add to the sources.list, but didn't seem to help. i can try something different tomorrow if you have suggestions.
ben_vulpes: <mircea
_popescu> anyway, the consensus seems to be 6.3 ? << i've yet to hear a compelling argument for anything past 0.5.3
ben_vulpes: <othernubs`> ben
_vulpes, speaketh << nothing strictly necessary post 0.5.3
decimation: mircea
_popescu: it strikes me that if rates are hiked both stocks and bonds would take a hit
mod6: ben
_vulpes's thing is gonna install 0.5.3
BingoBoingo: <mircea
_popescu> the bug is not so much of a concern, nobody is typing the book into a machine. << Wait, then what was the purpose again?
TheNewDeal: mircea
_popescu: there's not enough lsd in the world... << agreed
mircea_popescu: ben
_vulpes: what is this, late bettor hour? <<< asciilifeform will keep his bet now.
mod6: <+ben
_vulpes> mod6: let me know what style inputs you have << once tested, will do!
othernubs`: mircea
_popescu, so you're spilling your seekrit code fork or what?!
mod6: ben
_vulpes: in the sense that "this looks like it works" :}
othernubs`: decimation, mircea
_popescu bibles are like fine cigarette papers, made from rice
decimation: ben
_vulpes: that's a helpful blog (your summary of major changes)
mircea_popescu: TheNewDeal: mircea
_popescu was that AdamIRaway guy really a developer in the MMADX platform? << i have no idea. he said no. one of the guys he lists as associates was involved with it.
mod6: ben
_vulpes: <+mod6> any reason for deb 6 and not the latest?
mod6: ben
_vulpes: thanks for putting that script together.
decimation: ben
_vulpes: I donno, I haven't looked into that in detail
jurov: ben
_vulpes is weak in the faith
Apocalyptic: ben
_vulpes, have you read the HARDENING section in the makefile ? I think there is one from 0.6.2, not sure before
jurov: ben
_vulpes: paste it?
Apocalyptic: ben
_vulpes, otherwise it seems pretty reasonable
BingoBoingo: ben
_vulpes: You need to get crypto functions from somewhere
Apocalyptic: ben
_vulpes, "libqrencode-dev" is really needed for bitcoind 0.5.3 ?
pete_dushenski: jeff garzik made me do it. with a little nudge from Pierre
_Rochard
TheNewDeal: mircea
_popescu was that AdamIRaway guy really a developer in the MMADX platform?
mike_c: ben
_vulpes: i know in later version i had to explicitly set it blank
kakobrekla: ben
_vulpes i assume theres a default value ?
Apocalyptic: <ben
_vulpes> so forgive my c makefile naivte, but is there a difference between an USE
_UPNP= and just not declaring the variable? // that i do not know, not a bash specialist
ben_vulpes: so forgive my c makefile naivte, but is there a difference between an USE
_UPNP= and just not declaring the variable?