89100+ entries in 0.641s

danielpbarron: trinque,
I don't think there is any mention of bigfoot in The Bible
danielpbarron:
I can see why the levianthan would be particularly hard to accept, seeing as how the thing is supposed to currently be alive in the ocean, whereas many of the other far-fetched sounding things in The Bible are supposed to have only existed long ago
trinque:
I wonder if it's truly that the USA was *that* wealthy that it had this far to fall, that there is not yet starvation.
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
i suspect this may be a case of "you may not use that tool here" being taken for "
i don't like that tool". it was a domain problem most likely, but do link ?
mircea_popescu: when exactly was
i allergic to it ; and for that matter
i've been preaching blogging to people for years.
mircea_popescu: "
I think Free Software and Open Source addicts will get down from their current high and become tremendously frustrated when the obvious problem of having millions of pieces of source code available and they actually can't move in any direction because the ability to make modifications that they have so lauded in the past turn into a very serious problem when much bigger problems require modifications to much larger systems t
mircea_popescu: it is a problem BECAUSE
I AM THE BOSS OF YOU ; NOT YOU THE BOSS OF ME.
mircea_popescu: "|
I don't see why anyone would insist on a way to do things that does not solves the real problem, but rather solve an ancilliary problem that is a problem only because someone is very stubborn." << the political ineptidude of these people.
mircea_popescu: so then there's the two and only two available strategies. the psychopath (the more
i lose, the more
i send, fuck you) ; and the woman (the more
i lose, the less
i send, may my children cover the earth).
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you will note that there exists no life of the spirit outside of exactly this "
i will pick high level abstracrtion and proceed to allign realia to it"
mircea_popescu: anyway, the incomprehensible mists were him, not you. who the hell knows what's in the box of a guy who does such contradictory things as alf pointed out.
i wouldn't risk much on the theory we share any mythology, and it's not even directly evident gabriel_laddel actually lives meaningfully related to the human condition.
mircea_popescu: phf this "you already know all knowledge, just, you know, wash" is ridiculous enough, but nowhere the ridiculousness is in starker evidence than in the harem. "so
i washed, can
i bellydance yet ?" "no, wash more."
phf: mircea_popescu: that point is consistently being driven home. in fact
i got to talk lisp to a bunch of random people and had a very visceral experience of the gap. hathayogapradipika says to keep your yoga secret,
i.e. don't be a incomprehensible myst. but sometimes
i still get carried away. ~some~ people grok me though, even when
i start speaking internal experiences.
gabriel_laddel: asciilifeform: we've already discussed this.
I'm going to be selling masamune computers + related until the leap can be made from the cee machine to... something else
gabriel_laddel: asciilifeform:
I live in silly-con valley. If
I - just - wanted to make money
I'd be out doing it.
phf: mircea_popescu:
i don't take it all the way to the cave,
i believe that one can tap into shared mythic space which has more to do with human condition than it does with humanless abstract. but for how often
i'm misunderstood,
i suspect that socratic method is much more effective.
phf: mircea_popescu:
i'm actually more of jungian
phf: mircea_popescu:
i think that it is shared between all designers, it's just that newbs have a very adhoc design space vision, it's better formed with experience
gabriel_laddel: phf:
I just want the fking thing to work and make me some money.
phf: mircea_popescu:
i think asciilifeform and gabriel_laddel goals are very similar, combined together they'll produce an easy low complexity (but perhaps less glamorous) design space traversal path. gabriel_laddel doesn't see it, because he thinks that a certain stop on his path is "dirty" or somesuch, so he wants to avoid it altogether
mircea_popescu: phf the fundamental problem here is that you misuse words. "to resolve on the basis of" requires a basis, which is to say, something shared. whether right or wrong -
i can resolve quantum physics disputes on the basis of coran suras if need be. yet your thing is "this is cool so should be basis". how cool it is has no bearing on how shared it is, you know ?
phf:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-12#1519202 << it's kind of a pun,
i think of systems design as landscape traversal.
i think there are frequently paths, as is the case here, that hit multiple design goals and have lower overall complexity, better than a seemingly direct path, that has a hidden high complexity. abstract discussions about ideological goals, that don't take into account design space traversal can be resolved by actual taking
☝︎ gabriel_laddel: asciilifeform:
I can assure you that the problem here is not me. 'dated' (for some value of that word) a 35 yr chinese woman who had zero hangups
mircea_popescu:
i suspect the subtext there is "you're poor".
i've known irani chicks, not exhibited such problems. perhaps their daddy being petrified of me a large factor.
mircea_popescu: trinque> you'll actually get more useful work done if you take time to fix your life. <<
i support the notion. life's not a sprint but a marathon, and attempting to build anything serious on the very rotten shifty bases here described is not unlike trying to do clim in windows 95.
trinque: gabriel_laddel: y'know
I used to do this "fuck everything but work" thing, trying to get somewhere.
gabriel_laddel:
I had a girlfriend. was staying at her place when parents were out of town etc
gabriel_laddel: were
I fundraising for clim, yes, it would not be via 'crowdfunding' and yes, the numbers would be in the 10ks
gabriel_laddel: asciilifeform: also,
I'm not taking thousands in donations. jackdaniel is being paid several k to work on CLIM
☟︎ mircea_popescu: generally speaking,
i specifically do not wish for anyone to be able to redefine anything ever.
mircea_popescu: it's not that
i chose not to redefine sink as toilet. is that my sink CAN NOT BE so redefined.
mircea_popescu: you've just said "
i build escherian trestlework around it"
mircea_popescu: for the record, if a system had this sort of "semantic indirection" built in where any fuckwad could "redefine OPEN()"
i'd burn it and piss on the ashes.