78800+ entries in 0.038s
mircea_popescu: how, specifically, it goes varies by case. very often, at least in my youth, it was "that mp, he's such a great guy, not like the other vagabonds you keep bringing home!!1". ie, they self-repressed.
mircea_popescu: even with women that were orphans, or didn't talk to their mothers in years.
mircea_popescu: i'll say this much : that never in my history, with ANY woman, was it the case the mother didn't go some variant of apeshit and i repressed her into irrelevancy.
mircea_popescu: this is the important point here : that you're not attracted to the daugther's cunt. god knows there is naught more abundant on this earth. BUT you are to repress the mother into political irrelevancy.
mircea_popescu: the charge of the bacteriologist may well be that, but entirely different item, a charge.
mircea_popescu: i dunno dood, old women. who the fuck understands the mechanism of their trying to ruin the world.
mircea_popescu: you can't simply walk away / pretend it's not your problem. it is your problem.
mircea_popescu: so, the young woman wants to individuate, gives her cunt to male, old woman / mother goes apeshit, male protects cuntlet from her mother. this is how it goes.
mircea_popescu: let me explain to you how the duty of fucking works, because you're perhaps unaware.
mircea_popescu: sina : that's how this stuff goes, and wehy someone biting bullet and writing an impl, even if he writes it in php, is worth it. was deliberately demonstrated with the fabulous hash function, and generally.
mircea_popescu: i've seen some awesome bird-bird rape since i've been here btw. you have NO FDUCKING IDEA what birds do.
mircea_popescu: do you know how many soviets yelled at the television set ?
mircea_popescu: i don't want to grind myself by the measure of some 9.60 an hour mexicans in a kitchen somewhere.
mircea_popescu: see, because if she is too slow, i don't just SAY she's too slow. she fixes it. and if she dun fix it fast enough i got whips to help along. what's the gps do ? it doesn't afford you any agency towards the pizzeria. yet you're wartching. so what do you do ? you turn inward, educate ~yourself~.
mircea_popescu: slavegirl to run kitchen >>> gps to watch kitchen being run in
mircea_popescu: computer pseudoscience may be the only engineering discipline in which the ancient solutions actually are better.
mircea_popescu: but, and here's the beauty, for the same money today had salmon.
mircea_popescu: sina do you see how this is an extra cost, not an added benefit ?
mircea_popescu: sina the problem with the non-tmsr things is that they are undependable. in the complete sense of that term : temporally, functionally, you name it.
mircea_popescu: it can work, depending, but it doesn't work by itself, it has to be a very strictly examioned thing.
mircea_popescu: this is the root of the divergence so far, so not a bad reference. encountering a problem, sina tends to seek the "correct" dependency to bake in.
mircea_popescu: notice how it's not even POSSIBLE for the "same" message to be delivered via gossipd. for purely quantic reasons.
mircea_popescu: not "it won't work" but rather "will it be worth working"
mircea_popescu: the problem with it, once ammended for the sign issue, was not exactly technical, more in terms of how expensiuve it is
mircea_popescu: there's a difference between my client showing alf as "online" and my client being built on the concept of sessions.
mircea_popescu: the idea was to report to the operator, "We have link with x". but conceptually, sessions as a fundamental building block of comms, are not used.
mircea_popescu: Framedragger that is what "forever" means to machines.
mircea_popescu: sina i imagine it's a keyid of some kind. that makes a session ?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform exactly. nmot that i'm against further exploring the lighthouse thing, but gotta be separate item for nao.
mircea_popescu: if the operator of B opts to relay, at t5 various nodes will receive a P.?j
mircea_popescu: if the operator of B opts to respond, at t4 A will receive a P'.Ai
mircea_popescu: at t3, providing B has opted to decrypt P.B1, it is in possession of P. if P is a standard message, it contains a reference allowing it to respond.
mircea_popescu: at t2, B is free to decrypt or not decrypt P.B1. it is supposed to make this decision on the basis of B1 and whatever other data it uses to make such a decision.
mircea_popescu: there's no peer discovery as a gossipd function ; at all times it knows already all the peers it will ever know. in lawyer speak this is called "never ask a question you don't know the answer to."
☟︎ mircea_popescu: the only way for A and B to be introduced, outside of the grandfatherly, A fucks B and they exchange bits of paper, is C tells A about B and B about A.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: prolly should separate the re-discussing of that from the guy trying to comprehend the spec
mircea_popescu: you know, the lighthouse idea, while an idea, didn't actually get included.
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2017-06-28#1675565 << the problem with the concept of a "session" is that it attempts to link machine state to world state. this is a very tenuous proposition, and the fundamental reason why sessionificatyion of (the correctly designed) stateless
http protocol failed for 30 years straight and will continue to fail forever.
☝︎☟︎