8200+ entries in 0.021s
mod6: my question is then; with regards to the tmsr-rsa rough-sketch spec, do we then entertain the idea of other key-lengths, no just 4096 as currently outlined?
☟︎ mod6: hmm. so let's say, for instance, that you figure out how to make the 2^n version the same as the 64 width classic version -- performance-wise.
mod6: asciilifeform: thanks for posting
mod6: !~later tell mike_c hmm, ok thanks, we'll work through it.
mod6: ubuntu and it's hanging chads, i know the pain.
mod6: ok, well feel free to reach out to me when you're ready to try again, even if not today. i'll be here.
mod6: heh, ok, sorry for the pain.
mod6: ok, that's correct.
mod6: now `cd /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin ; make`
mod6: there should be a Manifest.sha512 in tehre too.
mod6: not the extracted stuff or anything else.
mod6: yeah, we just need the deeds.
mod6: ok, next: `cd /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin/deps ; cp ~/*.asc .` -- hopefully, in your ~ you only have .asc deeds, and not, say, other stuff...
mod6: we can pick this up later if you'd rather too. no worries.
mod6: you can try, but it may not help. i'd suggest starting clean from a failed build.
mod6: now, `cd /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin ; make clean`
mod6: copy /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin/deps/*.asc to some other holding tank and let me know when ready.
mod6: so now, let's back up your /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin/deps directory.
mod6: you must smite it :]
mod6: i think you can check in /etc/alternatives or whatever, to ensure there are no links or nothing to gcc5.
mod6: let me know before you try to rebuild, i'd like to walk you through flushing the tubs.
mod6: try 'purge' too if you need, consult man page for 'apt' if required.
mod6: are you certain that gcc5 is vanquished from your sys?
mod6: this bug seems to pop up with gcc5 iirc.
mod6: do you have rsync installed?
mod6: yeah. it doesn't work with gcc5. this looks like the ncurses bug.
mod6: ok. can you paste the error. i'll help you now if you have time, or we can try tomorrow (whenever) you have more.
mod6: have you ever built the new way phf?
mod6: if this doesn't work, i'll just help you step-by-step myself. no worries.
mod6: for the record, i don't have that in my builds either, ignore that mike_c
☟︎ mod6: phf: <+mike_c> this exists: /var/trb/trb54/bitcoin/build/toolchain/usr/x86_64-therealbitcoin-linux-musl
mod6: and there's no way, apparently, to solve this for everyone until bitcoinos/cuntos is a thing.
mod6: this is driving me crazy aha.
mod6: if he follows the directions exactly, shouldn't be an issue.
mod6: ultimately we determined it to be some type of environment issue.
mod6: we never did resolve what it was. and strangely, i've never seen it before. im perplexed.
mod6: that should be fine. there was a fella in here about a week ago with the same problem as you're having/
mod6: mike_c: did you get all of the vpatches, seals, and other things as described in the Howto?
mod6: make sure to use gcc4, i've seen problems myself with gcc5
mod6: <+mike_c> oh. yeah. ffs, why was i following offline todo. << aha, the ONLINE version is certainly less work
mod6: <+r0nin-> no << heh, so much for that eh
mod6: I think it's fine, we can ratify / ammend it as needed I suppose.
mod6: In that case, I have a bit more simplified version of mine that more closely resembles what I started with before.
mod6: yeah man. solid job.
mod6: using PeterL's method, i get the same number with openssl
mod6: im not sure i know how to code this.
mod6: i thought it was 1*2*3*5*7*11*13 ... all the way up through whatever prime fits into < 4160 bits.
mod6: maybe i misunderstand the request.
mod6: this primorial thing is gonna run for a while eh
mod6: thanks for humoring me though
mod6: having to do the 'rename'
mod6: a topic for further discussion i suppose.
mod6: looks cleaner. not sure it is necessary though.
mod6: ah, ok. so you gotta add a subtype for that.
mod6: alright. thanks for the explanation.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> and incidentally mod6 , is it obvious why this only works if L is restricted to powers of 2 ? << no, i think im missing the entire idea of why this is written this way.
mod6: i dun get why, if you didn't change the maff, why you would make it more complicated
mod6: the math is different from one to the other, is it not?
mod6: just was curious if your readability issue could be resolved with pulling the paramaters of Mul_Karatsuba back out in similar fashion to the original. 'tis all.
mod6: maybe i should ask a different question: which part do you find to be less readble?
mod6: not that the latter is all /that/ bad.