log☇︎
64400+ entries in 0.037s
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform it's obvious, we don't even know serpent is in fact no good, hence "you persuasively suggest may not be good (but not actually done the work to turn that suggestive theory in practice)"
mircea_popescu: good thing we have strong entreopy, to run serpent off it.
asciilifeform: ( btw is it obvious that we haven't , at this time, broken anyffing ? or not )
asciilifeform: imho the 'thing that makes us good' is that we dun do dumb shit like 'we know it's broken but we'll still use it because fuckyou should've discovered yer death ray in 1998'
mircea_popescu: might as well capitalize on Mocky 's experience turn it into a ruby gem, yes ?
mircea_popescu: why is s.mg better off with republican stack than with java stack ? it's still using serpent!
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform well, maybe your thread. my thread was re "are we fucking idiots ?! we have a foundation that wants to publish statements of the nothing as its only output, we have a bunch of smart people not helping our own industry avoid pitfals, and in this vein forever" ☟︎
asciilifeform: but to rage over 'why not found this in 1998' is imho odd at the very least.
asciilifeform: incidentally if mircea_popescu dun want to read re serp. scheduler, he dun have to !
mircea_popescu: they can go to a posh afair and show the designs to each other.
asciilifeform: thread was strictly re 'canhaz block ciphers?' , rather than 'let's talk mircea_popescu into switching to $weird'
mircea_popescu: let them design all they want.
mircea_popescu: im not hiring anyone to do it, not anymore. tried and failed.
mircea_popescu: the point there is I DESIGNED IT!!!
mircea_popescu: yes, im going to use a shittier-than-hoped for cipher, for lack of alternative.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu actually kicked off thread where 'could have replacement ? ' so added one to the record, in case a replacement turns out to be needed.
asciilifeform: i did not say 'let's use nao this replacement'
mircea_popescu: it's, as they call in busioness, "a no brainer" -- i ain't doing jack.
mircea_popescu: understand the position here : code (practice) <-> algos (theory). we currently have actual code for an algo that you persuasively suggest may not be good (but not actually done the work to turn that suggestive theory in practice) and suggest replacement algos (but not done work again). my option is to either put in 0 work for 0 result, or else put in x work for 0 result.
asciilifeform: and mircea_popescu is a trained maths fella, in fact theoretically moar qualified than asciilifeform to have found it
asciilifeform: 'why didn't you turn over this stone in '15 ?' 'there's 10^100 stones'
mircea_popescu: oh, that's easy, i didn't cuz i can't code.
mircea_popescu: is the idea more along then lines of "i knew about this all along, just didn't feel about telling you schmucks anything until after you poured cement" ? rather than "i literally could not be arsed to even look at this until someone poured some cement somewhere so i could pester them then" ?
asciilifeform: i had to algebraize the thing , and have just the right rng bits flip in head , to get the 'ceiling tiles' ( why didn't mircea_popescu get'em in '15 ? ) ☟︎
mircea_popescu: so then what the fuck happened, by your lights ?
asciilifeform: recall thread ?
mircea_popescu: that's all there is to it.
mircea_popescu: the only different element is that today, unlike in 2015 (and not even RIGHT NOW, today as in this year) diana_coman published serpent code.
mircea_popescu: looky, the past 3 days' work could have been done just as well in 2015 as today. ☟︎
asciilifeform: i found this (potential?) find by carrying out an experiment over mircea_popescu's objection, lol
asciilifeform: ( and , recall, mircea_popescu almost talked me out of it, 'nobody needs iron disk crypter with questionable serpent' )
asciilifeform: turning up the (potential! i aint even got a proof yet) weakness of the scheduler algo, took specifically the 'let's fpgaize, i think this is solid!' approach.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: fwiw i tried all kinds of approaches to breaking serpent in '16
mircea_popescu: in the sense of "wait for diana_coman to publish ada code and then i'll maybe give it 6 hours of attention". that's your 3years
asciilifeform: 'why didntcha find this sooner' is ridiculous q.
asciilifeform: i dun see why conjure up the presense that 'didn't participate at useful time' ; asciilifeform attacked problem of 'blockcipherism' ~continuously for 3+ yr.
mircea_popescu: and yes, ima implement "a cipher alf doesn't like" over alf's objections. because the only way alf'd be a stakeholder in this is... if... he had participated at a usefgul time. not at the time he felt like.
mircea_popescu: i said to diana_coman "implement serpent". that's it.
mircea_popescu: what, is this discussion abotu some magic number ?
asciilifeform: unlike the massive pile of pgpgrams-cum-aes we've collectively shat out all over the net, nobody's even ciphered anyffing with serpent of yet, aside from diana_coman's tests
mircea_popescu: i don't follow the logic.
asciilifeform: what i dun get is wai mircea_popescu thinks he has reached the place where 'no option' , afaik he hasn't baked $trillion asic . conceivably if mircea_popescu ( who 'i will live & die by factoring-is-not-in-P !' ) can reduce problem to factoring-not-in-P, he still has option .
mircea_popescu: i suspect, if you care to know, that you have a major problem in that you only want to work on anything once it's too late. not coincidentally, but structurally, it being too late is principally part of the criteria impelling you to work.
mircea_popescu: and if you're curious -- the reason they "whisper" is because they have 0 confidence there's any listeners. and listener means a very specific thing : the sort of person who both a) meets the intelligence bar AND!!! ALSO!!!! b) does not hallucinate options. such as "oh, dun need to do this now."
asciilifeform: it's how pc/os ended up what it is, neh. buncha folx 'i spent $trillion and nao i Dun Have The Option to stop..'
mircea_popescu: maybe you're magical and have this option of going back in time, and good for you. i do not.
mircea_popescu: i saw the problem, in advance, i did my best to solve it, this is what came out of that.
mircea_popescu: not a matter of ~want~. i DO NOT HAVE THE OPTION.
asciilifeform: i certainly dun dispute mircea_popescu's right to do it, if he wants.
mircea_popescu: i foresaw this need, in 2015. i put 10 btc behind encouraging people to fix the problem. it died an ignominous death, what i have is serpent, that's what it is.
mircea_popescu: not quite the same point.
asciilifeform: ( why bother with cipher, then, could make 9000x point by 'i'ma plaintext! take that!' )
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: i dun get it , you'd willingly use a broken cipher to make a point ?
mircea_popescu: this notion of "be anyone" etc is entirely fabricated, out of the venom of mother inca and the overactive brains of idle smart boys. nobody agrees with it, nothing agrees with it in practice, it never is nor ever was nor ever could be found in nature... it's like you thinking santa claus is real. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: g a point in case. if she's aspiring to "work for the government" she'll tell you about how unfair it is for blacks, if she aspires to work "for tech" she'll tell you how bad homeless are, if she wants to marry and dependopopotamusize she'll tell you handgun stats, whatever.
a111: Logged on 2018-10-31 00:12 mircea_popescu: in-group signalling, obviously someone not in-group would not say "drumpf" just like that.
mircea_popescu: Mocky "After enough conversations with chicks I found the pattern. They talk the same by race, they act the same they think the same. It’s like NPCs backed by a bored dialog writer wielding a Markov chain." << honestly, i dunno how much time you spent talking with us-born chickies, but the EXACT SAME THING APPLIES. and they even actively work to create such systematic nonsense, http://btcbase.org/log/2018-10-31#1867831 bein ☝︎
mircea_popescu: mod6 BingoBoingo send me those deets again, wouldja.
asciilifeform eats buffer, might take a while
mircea_popescu: for all i know, just about the time i'm done uprooting this and planting that, you'll be geniusing the exact same thing about that. i have 0 confidence this won't happen, specifically because of historical evolution, and so...
mircea_popescu: i ain't about to change the code i have for a theory that might maybe work because the theory behind the code i have might maybe not work according to this drawing.
mircea_popescu: how about that!
mircea_popescu: so the way this is going now -- serpent is going to be perfectly good (tm) for the republic, because the republic is the republic of slow moving, mentally confused morons that miss their opportunities to speak usefully.
mircea_popescu: not for his crime of "being smart" and "figuring out the true truth". but for his crime of saying things out of time. because there was a fucking time for this discussion, and it was strictly BEFORE s.mg paid money for people to work their ass off in preference of playing with their kids to get it a serpent.
mircea_popescu: the little architect hung by the neck until dead.
mircea_popescu: 3. s.mg tried to be the one fucking thing in its line with encrypted comms, for which purpose it attempted to take some guidance and apply it in practice. NOW, after the money's spent, and the work put in, now smartass-architect comes by to explain "how arches really should be" and "why these arches are terrible". this is worse than useless. not a little worse than useless -- much, MUCH worse than useless. all it does is get
mircea_popescu: t's doing it. because this is what la serenissima is all about -- the doge back in venice is more then welcome to wholeheartedly support whatever the fuck the merchants on the blue find correct just and expedient.
mircea_popescu: im not attached to serpent in any way other than in the following sense you're well fucking advised to pay attention to : 1. s.mg is a corporation, meaning ith's here to make money. 2. s.mg is also trying, but as a fucking distant second, to be a "good" corporation, however that is politically defined. it doesn't give a fuck about this, not in any deep sense, if the money's good it'll go against policy, and CHANGE policy as i
asciilifeform: ( pretty lulzy, btw, i had nfi mircea_popescu were so attached to serpent, nao i feel sad, it's almost like i killed his dog or wat )
asciilifeform: the discovery of 3y is that pc is actually pretty slow machine for bignumism once you stop leaking with timings
mircea_popescu: we've been talking about c-s for what, 3+ years ? it's still in the same phase.
asciilifeform: i recommend to at least draw it on paper, before throwing out.
asciilifeform: so far it's the least retarded variant i can think of. ( beats the shit out of sboxism, at any rate )
a111: Logged on 2018-11-01 16:55 mircea_popescu: Mocky Your comment on the following post is awaiting moderation: http://mocky.org/Souq-Waqif/ << nice cgi work keks
Mocky: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-11-01#1868297 >> congrats, ur the first person to leave a nameless comment on my blog. I may have to update my cgi to complain now ☝︎
mircea_popescu: if 1layer then there's no space for your other-sequence.
asciilifeform: see, rabin dun replace rsa, because of the 4-roots headache; but given as you kick off the 'session' with a rsagram, the latter can contain a bitstring that gives seq #1 . then it gets incremented and appended to payload of each rabinogram, allowing the 4 roots to be distinguished.
mircea_popescu: so have another layer of transport ?
asciilifeform: so no need for cryptotron to know about game structures.
asciilifeform: aha, this one'd be strictly for use in which-root
asciilifeform: ( the roots, note, are only available to the fella who has p*q of the n )
asciilifeform: as part of the rsa payload, give sequence #, and each rabinism will contain the correct next-seq in the correct-of-four roots
mircea_popescu: not in the general case at any rate.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: ideally you'd have some entirely unrelated mechanism, to do it with ( i dun currently have one to give )
mircea_popescu: the drawback is that now you mix game code into crypto lib, to discriminate possibles.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform right but it seems to me trivially easy to select among 4 possibles seeing how you know "this is a game packet, gotta have so and so serial and so and so id etc"
mircea_popescu: Mocky Your comment on the following post is awaiting moderation: http://mocky.org/Souq-Waqif/ << nice cgi work keks ☟︎
asciilifeform: ( i've all the necessary logic for it , even : it dun need optimized exponentiations )
Mocky: mircea_popescu, ok, thx
mircea_popescu: aactually... i guess i should've left that as a comment on the article in q. brb.
mircea_popescu: leaving aside how they all look like gypsies anyway.
mircea_popescu: a skill that'll prove most important in their own fucking country, last i heard all the fuckable women they grew locally they exported
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: the 'destructiring problem' is universal to all systems, even rsa
mircea_popescu: and it turns out qatar is actually more important for india than india itself realises : it's where the aspie indie elite goes to learn to be "gay", ie, "i can't get any cunt anyway, might as well get used to living with another dude, wardrobe as well as everything else comes cheaper this way, cheap enough in fact for even scum like me to get some".
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i dunno that'd be the end of the world. part of the problem of the usecase (eulora comms) is that you have highly structured inputs.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform not really looked into that deeply.
asciilifeform: ( tricky to actually use tho, produces decryption 4 ambiguous outputs, of which only 1 is correct answ )
asciilifeform: more interesting, imho, even, is rabin's system, which (unlike rsa) is equiv to factoring problem, and iirc requires only 4 multiplications to decrypt ( and only 1 squaring to encrypt )
asciilifeform: ( the fundamental q is not 'canhaz 4 ring binder?' or 'canhaz 3?' or 'canhaz clean desk' but rather 'canhaz symm cipher whose difficulty reduces to factoring but cheaper than abused-rsa ? ' )
asciilifeform: subj appears in the l0gz, but nuffin conclusive