61000+ entries in 0.033s
mod6: king
the explicit
time
to get my head screwed back on straight.
mod6: You know, I just went for a quick walk, and
the cold air did me some good. I
think maybe part of my problem is
that
the stress from being in
the soup for
the better part of a year has been a bit rough on me mentally. Been saying idiotic
things without
thinking, pasting shit without
thinking, etc. I dunno feels like a bit of sand-falling
through my hands -
trying
to get back into
the good graces without
ta
mircea_popescu: hey, we went
through a week or so of nubbins going "mp is a liar!!!", did exactly jack.
mod6: I see your point
totally.
trinque: if you don't see how
this leads straight
to
the contemporary hell, you do need
to
take
that vacation.
trinque: taking it
the other way, now
there's
this process where
trinque swears
to whoever's ledger
that asks (fee or not, doesn't matter here).
this comes
to signify something,
trustworthiness, w/e., can go
to wells fargo now and bring in
this credit report
to get a mortgage. now folks come churn deedbot
to produce
this empty signifier. later
trinque is asked
to you know, DETECT FRAUD, maybe with machine learning
☟︎ mod6 will bbl
to answer q's if required.
mod6: Thanks for
the wake-up call.
mod6: Basically, if someone says, "mod6 is liar!", and I publish my deedbot ledger, well,
then it stands alone.
To be evaluated at face value.
mod6: I have no real argument with your wanting
to stay out of any
type of arguments, or discuss anyones deedbot
tx's. Which, is
the rightful
thing
to do.
mod6: And
to
the 0% part, I just responded "Cool." because you reminded me of what was right and proper.
mod6: Well,
to your point of "emotional".
mod6: Maybe being around here so long has blurred
the lines for me, I consider you guys my friends.
trinque: you responded
to 0% of
the substance of what I said, and came back with "sorry you don't like me". come on, give it some effort!
trinque: yeah, I'm not looking for an emotional connection here when I'm
talking
to you.
mircea_popescu: nobody's offended, man. we're concerned, because you seem
to have contracted earworm.
mod6: I didn't mean any offense by
the
thread, I hope you and
trinque will forgive.
mircea_popescu: no, i know,
that's
the problem. you
thought you were being logical, and
the logical
thread you were following went along
the lines of...
mod6: Like I said, Mr. P. I'll be stepping away. I only remain just
to answer ben_vulpes's questions.
mod6: I didn't
think
that was
the case! I
thought I was being quite logical,
tbh.
mircea_popescu: which
then leads
to
the suspicion
that 4) regular dosing with idiocy
through direct exposure in his daily life is poisoning mod6.
mircea_popescu: mod6
that's fine and dandy, but look how
the logic works : 1)
the republic exists principally as a succession of schelling points, meaning
that "given a situation of structure X, republican will land on selection y" ; 2)
the impression is hard
to shake
that with ~extreme regularity~ your landing diverges from
that y, and in specific ways. which leads
to 3) somehow mod6 ended up mentally at odds with
the fundamentals of
tmsr,
trinque: if someone shows me
the
thing didn't work, I go fix a bug, but dispute resolution between users happens in *your* courts, not mine. if I later condescend
to involve myself in
the affairs of lowlier folks
than anyone present, it'll come yes with a hefty fee, or hanging both, or whatever most dissuades
the behavior.
mod6: I actually figured,
that in
the case where or if someone's deedbot history was ever called into question, someone would verify
the claim.
mod6: I guess I didn't know
that.
mod6: Other
than just by what people say.
mod6: I dunno, bad idea I guess. Just realized
that
there really is no way
to verify someones ledger.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-18 21:03 mod6: As you wish, you're a
trusted bitcoin lord
though, and you could even charge a fee for a service, perhaps? But what do I know.
ben_vulpes: in retrospect, doing any of
this in pm was entirely unnecessary and counterproductive.
mod6: (18:25) <ben_vulpes> .2 is sitting in bingoboingo's posession, and .3 was sent
to mats in july, so reduce
the cash balance by .5 and
that's what i'll deliver you
mod6: (18:24) <ben_vulpes> once i get your signoff on
that report, i'll send
the balance of
the cash
to your deedbot account
mod6: I do have logs of
that, would you like me
to paste
them here?
ben_vulpes: mod6: sorry for
the obtuse ask last night. it's not strictly necessary, but i would like you
to corroborate
that i wrote
those
two lines
to you in a private message on
that date. if you grep for "once i get your signoff", you'll find what i'm
talking about.
mod6: ben_vulpes: makes sense,
thanks.
a111: Logged on 2018-11-18 20:04 mod6: d10b713fd66312f2a498b8b93620d87836283bafcbd4b969b1b842ccf11b2beb | ben_vulpes | 6.56190000 | 2018-07-11 06:52:43.265797-07 |
Transfer of entirety of outstanding Pizarro funds
to deedbot wallet.
trinque: it is *your* choice what you say about yourself and
that's where it ends.
trinque: certainly not whatever. I'm not becoming a source of information about people's bot use.
the panopticon habits are not made clean when somebody calling himself a lord picks
them up.
mod6: Someway
to cross-reference
this if need-be could be a service. But like I said. Whateves.
mod6: True, at
the end of
the day, someone has
to
take my word for it
though when it comes
to me signing my ledger.
trinque: and it's better
than
the imperial "some faceless dork with a hat vouches for everyone"
trinque: the wot is already
the mechanism
to do what you're
trying
to get me
to do.
mod6: As you wish, you're a
trusted bitcoin lord
though, and you could even charge a fee for a service, perhaps? But what do I know.
☟︎ trinque: mod6: you don't want me derping about like I'm republican
transunion.
there isn't such a
thing.
diana_coman: jurov, BingoBoingo confirmed, I can see
them;
thanks!
jurov: BingoBoingo: diana_coman:
the shares were pushed
a111: Logged on 2018-11-18 16:57 asciilifeform: unrelatedly, ave1 , diana_coman , mircea_popescu , phf , other folx with a gnat and 10min of free
time -- asciilifeform would like
to see outputs of
http://www.loper-os.org/pub/ffa/thousand_muls.txt ( ch12 benchmark ) on various irons
deedbot: Invoiced BingoBoingo 0.02 << CoinBr asset
transfer
jurov: !!invoice BingoBoingo 0.02 CoinBr asset
transfer
mod6: (Thank you again for conducting
this audit, I very much appreciate it.)
mod6: Does
that complete any corroboration
that you were looking for?
mod6: Not sure why
the dates are off a bit, but
the amount seems
to make sense
to me now.
mod6: Ok, I see where you got
that number now.
mod6: Anyway, we all know
that I'm not very clued on
this stuff, but I don't see how your records say you sent '6.56190000'
to me, and my deedbot wallet ledger shows '6.21445021'.
mod6: trinque could even audit my publication and signoff
that it indeed matches his records if need be.
mod6: Anyway, if it's helpful, I'm happy
to sign my deedbot wallet ledger and publish it for
those
to review. Just say
the word and will do.
mod6: I can confirm
that approximately ".2" was said
to be held in BingoBoingo's custody outside of
the deedbot wallet. And I can confirm
that I have notes
that state
that you paid mats .3, and
to reduce
the amount by .5
total.
mod6: (this all from what I consider
to be
the 'source-of-truth'; my deedbot wallet ledger)
mod6: This is how much I received, and on
the 15th
mod6: Before
that
tx, where you send me
the remaining pizarro funds, my balance was "0.08479669 BTC".
mod6: The amount and
the date appear
to be off
to me.
mod6: d10b713fd66312f2a498b8b93620d87836283bafcbd4b969b1b842ccf11b2beb | ben_vulpes | 6.56190000 | 2018-07-11 06:52:43.265797-07 |
Transfer of entirety of outstanding Pizarro funds
to deedbot wallet.
☟︎ mod6: "Let's show what we're filtering out as well:",
to which
this
tx, amount, and date appear:
trinque: just wrote a
tool
to minimize
the human component of doing
that,
though.
mod6: BingoBoingo: Can you confirm for us all
that you have '0.20113128 BTC' (from ben_vulpes' note above) set aside from bbisp, etc? I only ever see ".2xxxx" mentioned in places.
trinque: big
transactions
take a lulzy amount of
the stuff
to import into
the cold wallet
trinque: for
those waiting on withdrawals, I'll return and complete
them once I stock back up on .....paper! brb
a111: Logged on 2018-11-18 07:13 ben_vulpes: mod6: i ask for your corroboration of a log line in
that letter.
mircea_popescu: but be
that as it may.
there's ~nothing of interest
to you here, so you can just safely forget about it.
mircea_popescu: the chicks
that commission actual installations for me, be it an acre of ground-to-ground missile
tubes or a parking lot, are devops. not
the chicks
that copy recipe books.
mircea_popescu: and so it's "devops" because what exactly, you wrote
them a ruby gem or w/e. ?
echelon: yeah, but most pirates just ripped from a
tv
tuner anyway, so i don't
think it had much effect
mircea_popescu: ie, a job
that's strictly impossible in
the general case, but
then again dealing with
the sort of morons who actually care about hbo, so not quite hard
to do in particular.
mircea_popescu: mkay. and
the idea was
to put
the ip or w/e of
the "subscriber" into
the downloads so
that if
they
turn up on
torrents hbo lawyers know what soccer mom
to send abusive readers' digest spam
to ?
echelon: i dunno if
they do anything different now
mircea_popescu: drinking by yourself, you know. what
the fuck is it ? some variant of
the above.
echelon: asciilifeform: it was watermarked in real-time on
their "go" service
a111: Logged on 2017-04-09 23:14 mircea_popescu: "who do you
think will win, mr 13,
the
team with
two guys and monkeys or
the
team with
three guys and monkeys ?"
echelon: mircea_popescu: it's like stegonagraphic watermarking, so even if you resize
the video resolution,
they could forensically identify
the source of
the piracy
mircea_popescu: what's
this supposed
to even be, in human language, "i wrote
the bills of purchase for
the project manager in charge of provisioning
the one room in hbo
tower where
they
take copied hard-drives
to see whether
there's hbo shows on
them, aka devops eng" ?
echelon: ben_vulpes: yeah, on bezosnet, but using
the api for automated provisioning with ansible and stuff
mircea_popescu: what
the fuck is a forensic watermark anyway ? don't you have
to have
the watermarks ~before~ you can "forensic" ?
ben_vulpes: clickin buttons in bezosnet and mashin
tab in intellij?