534500+ entries in 0.343s
decimation: yeah I like
the surprisingly reactionary 'election'
hanbot: i guess "unactivated" is
the socially acceptable
term for nonhuman. and here i
thought it was
the concept itself
that bothered folks.
mircea_popescu: well, whadda
they want, bitcoin scam foundation sold lifetime seats and ran out of money. of course it's not gonna honor
them
assbot: Bg002h comments on Looks like over 80% of Bitcoin Foundation members are not allowed
to vote in
the current election - including several candidates & current board members. ... (
http://bit.ly/19iWv0t )
assbot: Looks like over 80% of Bitcoin Foundation members are not allowed
to vote in
the current election - including several candidates & current board members. : Bitcoin ... (
http://bit.ly/19iWbPm )
mircea_popescu: well, i would imagine if
they actually aim
to be female
they'd miss having a cunt more
than having a dick.
Bagels7: I never asked but I might assume
they miss having a dick
Bagels7: okay so i heard
that
there are some who lose
their sex drive and become some sort of bitter bitch but
they must have been
the ones
that were confused or coherced
mircea_popescu: well, i guess maybe you're better connected in
the group
than me. i mostly know clinicians.
Bagels7: yes, mainly
them i had in mind
Bagels7: yeah but
they call
themselves women not
transsexuals
Bagels7: how are
there no "happy postop
transsexuals"
Bagels7: so i was reading
trilema.com, just gets me wound up sometimes
BingoBoingo: Japanese companies
tend
towards similarly high share prices because of a lack of splits
mircea_popescu: well, berkshire is kind-of famous for
this reason. you never heard of it ?
wpalczynski: ive just never seen a share of any company worth nearly
that much
TheNewDeal: ;;later
tell
TomServo I'm in
town
this evening, out
tomorrow morn. Will be back
thursday
wpalczynski: what are
they
talking about? how can one share be
trading at 185k?
assbot: BitBet - Bitcoin
to surpass Berkshire as an investment :: 1121.15 B (20%) on Yes, 4393.47 B (80%) on No | closed 53 minutes ago ... (
http://bit.ly/1CtSH6l )
wpalczynski: what do you guys make of
this btc rise? any new behind it?
mircea_popescu: these people and
their narcissistic delusions of self importance.
joecool: *shrugs* stranger
things have happened
thestringpuller: eventually i plan
to run cron job
that pulls data from kako's w.b-a.link api
thestringpuller: Nah its a static graph. And I need
to redo one of
the algorithms
to only list
those with L2
trust, a few pop up
that shouldn't be
there.
joecool: thestringpuller: is
that only importing from gribble's wot when a new member joins
the -assets wot?
mod6: Anyway, none of
this really matters until we can get a statically linked build.
mod6: There's a lot of moving parts in
there, and deps. It's hard
to put a finger on what exactly it is, right now. Especially since we are all using slightly different environments.
Too many variable.s
mod6: We'll figure it out at somepoint. I
think, for now
the important
thing is
that we have a workaround.
mod6: as you just proved, it'll make it past it sometimes, and sometimes not. im sure
there is some sort of reason for
this, but we dont know what it is at
this
time.
mod6: it probably will
take a while.
mod6: aight. so yeah, stay
tuned. as soon as I get anything working with static libs and static linking of
the output object files from
the bitcoin source base, I'll give an update.
mod6: makes for a larger output binary (by about 10mb) but is more safe incase someone were
to do something nasty with a lib
that is dynamically linked
thestringpuller: okay i see. been a lot longer
than I realize before really looking at C/C++ code. (although
this i pretty much all boost which I guess alf pointed out)
mod6: it will build all of
the necessary
things inside of
the output binary, instead of leaving
that stuff
to call out
to a seperate place
mod6: for
the last 48 hours i've been working on
trying
to get it
to build against static libs.
mod6: it'll build, it'll build
the `bitcoind` binary dyamically linked.
mod6: when statically linking via
the makefile.unix
that's included with v0.5.3, I can't even get mine
to compile correctly. So, I'll be spending a lot of
time probably re-writing
the entire makefile
punkman: I compiled and run up
to wedge on deb 7
mod6: ok
thats awesome. although, i
think what everyone has been running up
to now is a dynamically linked version of
the output binary. which shouldn't even be availab.e
mod6: thanks for
testing. if you put
together a pastebin of your findings: `./bitcoind getinfo` `openssl version -a`, etc.
that would be helpful for our permutation matrix
thestringpuller: if it gets current blockheight, i'll open up ports and run
this as my full node instead of 0.8 version was
tricked in
to using.
mod6: you might be
the first
to be
testing on deb7, not sure.
mod6: so its
totally inconsistant
mod6: and recently,
TomServo was able
to fully sync
the blockchain with config: v0.5.3 + patches + { 1, rm_rf_upnp, 2, 3, 4, 6 & 7 } AND with openssl v0.9.8o
mod6: well, remember, I've personally gotten past
that block probably a dozen
times with openssl 0.9.8o with config: v0.5.3 + patches { 1, rm_rf_upnp, 2, 3, 4, & 6 }
thestringpuller: it's also slow as molasses and
they want
to increase
the size of
these blocks?
mod6: If you got past 168,001 without any erros reported in `./bitcoind getinfo`
then you should be alright.
mod6: <+thestringpuller> mod6: ben_vulpes it got past
the wedge <+thestringpuller> "blocks" : 164713 << looks
to me like you just hit a spot where it was slow, maybe a lot of disconnected blocks.
this isn't
the "wedge" block we were hitting.
tx we had issues with (VerifiySignature) was in block 168,001. It's all in
the logs.
trinque: kicked it up
to a bigger ec2 instance; not exactly a mindboggling increase in
the rate of munching blocks
trinque: redid
the
thing with
the bootstrap
torrent on
the server, and it's on mid december as of now
trinque: mircea_popescu: btcd chewed up a drive on me;
that stream of "adding orphan block" was preceded by an input/output error barf
cazalla: danielpbarron: he's never worked for a living in his life <<< maybe he can get a job as a postman because he never fails
to deliver
cazalla: way
to butcher PseudoNode spelling
punkman feels no need
to
talk about bitcoin with random people or meet local bitcoin holders
Adlai: hanging onto cash during
times of
trouble is rather similar
to 'hodl'
Adlai: social, in
the sense
that you hold fiat because
that's what everybody else holds
Adlai: well, ok, not anybody,
those
that have learned from being marginalized
that 'society' isn't necessarily acting on any good reason
Adlai: my first 'irl friend' who became a holder has remarked
that
the main (if not only) obstacle
to holding is a social one; so anybody who has been marginalized
their entire life (in
this case, we were discussing religious minorities, but
this equally applies
to
the 'functionally insane') is automatically more receptive
than
the mean
mircea_popescu: * Adlai wonders what such a person's shrink would
think if first hearing about bitcoin from such a patient << srsly.
danielpbarron: i'm not sure how much of it he sincerely believes, and how much is an attempt
to get a rise out of me
Adlai wonders what such a person's shrink would
think if first hearing about bitcoin from such a patient
danielpbarron: yes; he gets checks from
the state for being crazy
danielpbarron: he has nothing better
to do, and has apparently been obsessing about me
punkman: danielpbarron: why
the hardon for you?
punkman: wasn't he
the fellow with
the broken dick?
punkman: ruin_dpbs_life: danielpbarron: you're a dead man i'm going
to fucking do whatever it
takes
to hurt you << lolwut