log☇︎
417600+ entries in 0.281s
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: i'm not convinced that there is enough 'genuine cheat' or whatnot to go around. hence, the simulacra.
mircea_popescu: the web 2.0 has, basically, failed in all its promises except one. it does give monkleys something to play with.
assbot: Spamming reddit, an "experiment". on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1fsDRpu )
mircea_popescu: they pretend like they're advertising, but aren't actually reaching anyone. they pretend like they're socializing, but they're socialising with perl scripts (as per http://trilema.com/2014/spamming-reddit-an-experiment/ ). they pretend like they're doing banking except they aren't actually, and "cheating" on their wife with gif-provided motion and indian call center provided voice.
trinque: kakobrekla: heh was every line trying to figure out if it was going to be scrollable?
mircea_popescu: and what they do all day is, PRETEND like they're doing something.
mircea_popescu: then there's a secopnd web, to use its own terminology web2.0. this is composed of ALL the sites that uses https, for any purpose. such as "logins" as if that makes any sense.
kakobrekla: a 'missing' 'overflow: hidden' was the cause
mircea_popescu: which is to say : there's two webs. one is the original web, which exclusively consists of non-interactive http served documents. this is the same it always was, more or less.
assbot: Logged on 20-08-2015 03:59:34; mircea_popescu: re the ashley madison thing, i believe it chiefly provides the same service faux exchanges etc provide to the click-bound generation. ie, they get to pretend like they're traders, don juans, what not, all from the safety of their own den, and - crucially - without actually doing it.
mircea_popescu: incidentally, re http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=20-08-2015#1245067 : it occurs to me that this situation is not just pseudo-exchanges and fake dating sites etc. this is universally true of the web. ☝︎
trinque: it's one of those giant monstrosities that every simple question is hard to answer
mircea_popescu: i guess it COULD be that it actually rejected the provided ids "because they start with digit" and ending up with a soup ?
trinque: can be narrowed by specifying IDs, using > to specify "just immediate child" etc
trinque: cause it has to search the whole DOM tree
trinque: could be heavy depending on the structure of the markup
mircea_popescu: trinque the file i uploaded uses the same css the not working log used tho, and worked fine!@
trinque: some css selectors can be heavy to apply
felipelalli: mircea_popescu, thank you for the links! I was trying to find something relevant on log but I didn't so far.
mircea_popescu: but listen... all i took out was the js!
mircea_popescu: ahhh this is nice to get back.
assbot: Third pass addressing the more common pseudo-arguments raised by the very stupid people that like the Gavin scamcoin proposal on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1fsD6gg )
assbot: Let's address even more of the more common pseudo-arguments raised by the very stupid people that like the Gavin scamcoin proposal on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1fsD6g6 )
assbot: Let's address some of the more common pseudo-arguments raised by the very stupid people that like the Gavin scamcoin proposal on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. ... ( http://bit.ly/1fsD6g3 )
mircea_popescu: felipelalli or alternatively the cannonical texts on the topic. http://trilema.com/lets-address-some-of-the-more-common-pseudo-arguments-raised-by-the-very-stupid-people-that-like-the-gavin-scamcoin-proposal http://trilema.com/lets-address-even-more-of-the-more-common-pseudo-arguments-raised-by-the-very-stupid-people-that-like-the-gavin-scamcoin-proposal http://trilema.com/third-pass-addressing-the-more-common-pseudo-a
mircea_popescu: danielpbarron lotta people are sorta like that, really. the hope and expectaton of a "greatness of the people" is hard to shake.
mircea_popescu: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all" href="http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/css/all.css" />
trinque: danielpbarron: man, he's a socialist? that's disappointing.
mircea_popescu: the only thing i changed is the head, now it reads
mircea_popescu: http://trilema.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/log.html << check that version out. it loads fine, at least for me.
assbot: Logged on 11-08-2015 06:07:22; trinque: man, I love Maddox so much
danielpbarron: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=11-08-2015#1234461 << i've been listening to his podcast ever since his article on the dance party for the shamed fat guy; the show is just barely interesting to have on in the background thanks to his somewhat libertarian-leaning co-host, Dick Masterson. Maddox himself is a damn dirty socialist, and also a self-described 'programmer' who frequently speaks to the virtues of winbl0ws ☝︎
kakobrekla: its always in the head.
mircea_popescu: the problem is in the head.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i just loaded a version without the head section
danielpbarron: js is what makes the selected line (via url) turn yellow
ascii_field: mircea_popescu, kakobrekla: why does that thing need js??!!!
trinque: the browser is the ultimate "make a name for myself" hell.
ascii_field realized long ago that standards committees attract at least half a dozen distinct types of vermin. one of which is the sort of fella who vandalizes bus stops, carves initials in
mircea_popescu: <script src="/js/jquery-1.8.3.min.js"></script><script src="/js/jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js"></script> < those changed ?
ascii_field: 'cause some twit
ascii_field: is there ANYTHING that wasn't there in june ?
kakobrekla: there is no colors in the code now, still slow
mircea_popescu: might not be... i noticed after they were introdfuced tho
kakobrekla: but its not the colors!
mircea_popescu: ima pore through this file now see wtf.
ascii_field: it started on or very close to the hour when the colours were introduced.
mircea_popescu: but i guarantee this was not present 1 month ago, or even a week ago.
mircea_popescu: could there be a cache involved ?
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla specifically what was i testing ? log.bitcoin-assets.com right ?
ascii_field: somehow i wasn't thinking in that key.
kakobrekla: mircea_popescu try now
mircea_popescu: i'm tryin' to pass along to you the methodology knowledge of people in this field, ya know ?
ascii_field: mircea_popescu, kakobrekla: i also noticed this. even dug in the payload, found nothing
mircea_popescu: it's also applicabe to things like "internet websites", for the same reason. hence the b-something comment above.
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i use the log daily and the problem only started maybe 2 days ago. somehow.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: funnily, the saltus thing is applicable to modern crapware written by morons who slavishly copy one another with minor variations
kakobrekla: yeah looking into it, checked and old backup copy of the file - still slow
mircea_popescu: this is a fine approach for computer viruses. for very good reasons i won't go into for the sake of not boring everyone.
mircea_popescu: "fits in head" too ?
mircea_popescu: i bet alf's idea of microbiology work is "examine the bugs individually under microscope"
mircea_popescu: "benzinga.com" ? wtf, your dragnet's too tight, picking everything
mircea_popescu: ascii_field thanks
mircea_popescu: felipelalli suppose you actually read the logs.
felipelalli: if Bitcoin Core pushes forward to increase the block size, how to resist to it if the miners decide to support the fork? Any other version unsupported by the miners would be very vulnerable to attacks from the fork side?
mircea_popescu: im reduced to using it through archive.today ffs.
ascii_field: mircea_popescu: http://dpaste.com/3M0W299.txt << have a turd
mircea_popescu: or as that works out in bitcoin, from "developers" to "XT team"
mircea_popescu: but they were, according to usg, unknown. only recently were they moved from field to embassy duty
mircea_popescu: hearn was added to support gavin almost as soon as gavin did his "presentation" at cia.
mircea_popescu: yes. except this need wasn't perceived back in say 2013.
ascii_field: (existed to make 'core' look like a decent thing)
mircea_popescu: in the current state this is actually fine. "debate core vs xt" misrepresentation is a degradation of "core consensus" prev state.
danielpbarron: yet another guy who "teaches the controversy" that the "debate" is whether to use 'Core' vs 'XT'
danielpbarron: some guy who isn't in the WoT
assbot: shitco.in | The Bitcoin XT Trojan ... ( http://bit.ly/1NwckBo )
felipelalli: I'm reading http://shitco.in/2015/08/19/the-bitcoin-xt-trojan/ now. Who is this guy "goat"?
trinque: mein gott the lolz
trinque: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/20/us-ashleymadison-cybersecurity-idUSKCN0QP20K20150820 << In a message, the hackers, who call themselves the Impact Team said: "Hey Noel, you can admit it's real now."
danielpbarron: and to those who might not have noticed, the assbot bit.ly links forward to archive.is
felipelalli: ascii_field, yes! :) this is true.
ascii_field: felipelalli: from that perspective, a fella who was offered every chance to get in wot, and we saw that he understood how it works, but refused - has already negrated himself to -$maxint
felipelalli: trinque, the link I tried to enter was this one: http://dpaste.com/10RVK2B.txt (above your commentary). But I should enter in deedbot link, not this one that is expired.
trinque: felipelalli: good reason to do business in-WoT though
trinque: at least as long as the life of the chain
felipelalli: ascii_field, this is actually useful to identify scammers. Scammers does not like to register in WoT systems because they are easily got.
trinque: this is actually the thing that most excites me about bitcoin: permanent social memory
trinque: "fuck he who did X" is a fine thing to preserve permanently
trinque: this is why I suggest deeds for this, rather than WoT ratings
ascii_field: why does wot need to be a dead hand ?
ascii_field: felipelalli: why not simply rate'em if they ever show up.
felipelalli: trinque, ah, lol, amazing. thank you! The deedbot link didn't work when I tried to enter in it. My idea was to be able to rate an "abstract entity" that could represents a person or company that wasn't registered on WoT.
thestringpuller: ascii_field: has been watching face-off too much
trinque: ascii_field: not at all; making a deed serves a similar purpose if the individuals are easily identified by the contents of the deed
ascii_field: felipelalli: 'I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.' (tm) (r) (babbage)
trinque: felipelalli: 'twas above that one, BingoBoingo made a deed in which he promised to rate certain individuals -10 should they ever appear in the WoT ☟︎
assbot: Logged on 05-08-2015 06:35:37; trinque: ;;later tell felipelalli you've spoken about the idea of rating people not in the WoT; there's a great way ^
felipelalli: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=05-08-2015#1225351 << trinque I'm sorry, but I didn't understand. I tried to find in the history but I couldn't. What exactly is a great way to rate people outside the WoT? Thank you! ☝︎
BingoBoingo: *no colon there
BingoBoingo: thestringpuller: is working on the blacklist article