log☇︎
404200+ entries in 0.263s
asciilifeform: there are no germans today, as surely as there are no romans.
phf: trinque: it took an awfully long time, i want my utopia tomorrow!
asciilifeform: then they lost a war and got culturally annihilated and enslaved by the anglos. ☟︎
trinque: phf: the germans weren't that great once upon a time, then they came around
asciilifeform: yes, every last 'phreedom fighter' in the desert.
asciilifeform: to the point of being cattle for washington.
trinque: heh, there are those social spiders in the Congo
phf: i guess ascii's point is that skullfuckers are not particularly good at ic design, etc.
asciilifeform: but this is not interesting to me personally.
asciilifeform: since mircea_popescu is asleep, i will have to fill in for him and point out that cockroaches COULD develop civilization after ten million years of inhabiting the burned-out husks of the skyscrapers.
trinque: every time one group weakens and falls inward, someone else is there to skullfuck them
trinque: I think the problem with the idiocracy idea is precisely "here is everywhere"
asciilifeform: and if it were to be fought, it will be fought with museum pieces from 1950s (all modern aircraft, for instance, are) and the next war will be fought with bow and arrow.
asciilifeform: trinque: too lazy even for proper war.
asciilifeform: not the least reason for this is that research PER SE is now a lemon market.
trinque: but the analogy was that one could sell technological dope to fund research on the other thing
trinque: I don't underestimate anyone who can handle that level of organizational complexity
asciilifeform: fact is, dealing dope is rather like, e.g., smelting aluminum, but much more so: attracts eminently practical types with zero imagination. by necessity.
asciilifeform: notice that they exist only in fiction.
trinque: ever read Egan's thing about Colombian biotech-lords?
asciilifeform: 'owning' is easy, it merely requires the other contenders to die.
asciilifeform: i should look for great cultural product from them ?
asciilifeform: and when the cockroaches own it?
trinque: owning the southern united states someday.
asciilifeform: what great cultural products ought i look for from the sellers of crack ? ☟︎
trinque: that cartels sell crack and heroin does not preclude them from whatever other activities they might undertake
asciilifeform: and sunlight that can be charged for is not sunlight.
asciilifeform: trinque: and THAT is why no one has rebuilt computing.
trinque: all businesses that grow operate like this
asciilifeform: trinque: aha, get to the moon by stacking chairs. i'll watch.
trinque: I've seen men before that fixated on a desired end result so much that they didn't bother with the intermediate steps at all.
asciilifeform: 'Grow up, graduate, marry, start a family, buy a house, have an accident, get seriously ill for a while, or a number of other very expensive things people actually do all the time, and the value of your work starts to get very real and concrete to you, at which point giving away things to be "nice" to some "community" which turns out not to be "nice" _enough_ in return that you will actually stay alive, is no longer an option.'
trinque: which is why I keep bringing up incremental products along the way to rebuilding computing
phf: well, i have a 2.4 box that runs "if your dodgy stack fails, this must remain" operations, like email, sms, incidentally that is also last version i can find my way around (pretty sure massive amd/intel commit blogs came later), but it's impractical to use it as main system, unless you go to extreme measures of "my gimp 1.2 is as good as your photoshop" rms style
asciilifeform: 'All of this "code sharing" is an economic surplus phenomenon. It works only when none of the people involved in it are in any form of need. As soon as the need arises, a lot of people discover that it has cost them real money to work for the community and they reap very little benefit from it, because they are sharing value-less services and getting value out of something that people take for granted is hard to impossible.' ☟︎
asciilifeform: he more or less gave up on life, after failing to find the answer to this.
phf: asciilifeform: i don't think "having-been-doing-it-since-2000" is true, naggum ran into the main issue when he tried to run his own fork of 19 without the mule braindamage, gave up since merging changesets becomes unproductive. i think somewhere around those emails he talks about how he no longer has stamina to review new changes that are introduced into his system, and that's 2001 or so
trinque: people buy derpy firewall devices all the time
assbot: Logged on 01-08-2015 05:46:04; mircea_popescu: taci si suge.
asciilifeform: trinque: the businessman will go broke.
asciilifeform: enough of them as it is.
asciilifeform: it has to do with 'i will not deliberately introduce undebuggable faults into my life'
trinque: a businessman might begin with creating the network device, then later try to build a boy that needs no bubble
asciilifeform: and more to do with 'my machine is mentally mine'
asciilifeform: it has fuck-all to do with 'attacks'
asciilifeform: trinque: this is a common misconception. has nothing to do with attacks.
asciilifeform: trinque: anyone who wants to abandon the net can do it right now.
trinque: the "blobs" for example, the concern is attack vector, right?
trinque: could consider your computers "bubble-boy", unfit to interact directly with the outside world
asciilifeform: what's that to do with it
trinque: this is why that packet-parsing networking device interests me so much.
asciilifeform: punkman: it is so wrong to asl for at least the performance of my 2007 desktop in the portable?
asciilifeform: hell, increasingly difficult to get a stationary box that runs blobless.
asciilifeform: but go an find a ~portable~ box with high-res ips lcd, with RECENT cpu, that runs without blobs.
asciilifeform: this is why i'm fundamentally in agreement with mircea_popescu's traditional retort 'go back in time and make better life choices'. but it applies just the same to my own sins, just different ones, not involving linux
trinque: when I say desktop, I mean place where I tape together system functionality into functions I use in daily work
asciilifeform: phf: the thing is, it is still possible to run linux as if it were 2005.
phf: desktop linux destroyed linux as a system for professional workstations. poetering (or whatever) made his name on desktop-ification of subsystems that were supposedly "hard for common user"
trinque: and this tape-job holding emacs and stumpwm (and now conkeror) together is hideous
asciilifeform: cannot be made to work ~decently~ (that means thinkpad w540 or AT LEAST that level of hardware) for ANY AMOUNT of money
trinque: so you either spend the inordinate amount of time I have writing your own tools for the "desktop" or pay someone who already handled that for you
phf: but would play videos, do projectors and connect to wifi, or whatever was the pet peeve. battery life
phf: this is also roughly the period when people running various unixes on their thinkpads imho decided that as long as you have to deal with shitty code, might as well use a mac, which let you run same userspace, at the time still had an opensource kernel, etc.
kakobrekla: fuck claims, thats rand()+2
punkman: phf: and in 2006 it had that nice rng bug
trinque: kakobrekla: claims 9hrs; I would expect with heavy use it's more like half that.
phf: in ~2015~ it's a different story, and i'm not arguing the value of gentoo here
kakobrekla: trinque whats the buttery time on that thing
phf: asciilifeform: it's not theoretical. base set of debian packages was fairly clean in 2005, and the few that you wanted to behave your way, you could ~trivially~ modify
asciilifeform: even if could, theoretically, 'remove' with tweezers.
asciilifeform: i don't want the cockroaches in the kitchen to begin with
phf: asciilifeform: these days it is, yes. back then the little amount of crap you had could be manually removed by patching your deb package or whatever
asciilifeform: aha. plus judicious package selection in the first place.
asciilifeform: i don't want anything on my box I DIDN'T PUT THERE.
asciilifeform: phf: the point of gentoo, in my view (i've been on it for more than a decade, freebsd before that) is to BANISH CRAP from machine
phf: funkenstein_: when gentoo came out it had a reputation of being a "ricer" os, like how people put spoilers on cheap cars to make them "racing cars". all you need to know is how to tweak a few flags, and then spend a night watching a compilation log. of course these days ~even that~ is an arcane skill
asciilifeform: trinque: there are two major chemistries, 'tn' ('twist-nematic') and the superior 'ips'
kakobrekla: tn matrix of the lcd screen
kakobrekla: thats tn ?
asciilifeform: funkenstein_: you are running a closed turd
trinque: don't ask me what I did to make it work, though
trinque: my gentoo install on the x1 is entirely adequate, can suspend
asciilifeform: funkenstein_: and did you PERSONALLY build the kernel, without closed blobs ?
kakobrekla: well just once. i was trying to see how sturdy it is. and i broke it. was an easy change of part tho.
funkenstein_: qubes on a lenovo box here at the moment
funkenstein_: 12 year old girl installed debian on a dell box the other day
funkenstein_: once i moved to only open source software I have to install linux on a few laptops every month
asciilifeform: funkenstein_: since you apparently missed the whole thread, the reason is TO HAVE A PORTABLE UNIX BOX THAT EVEN SORT-OF WORKS ☟︎
funkenstein_: as I see it the reason to have a crapple is you can pretend to know nothing about computers
kakobrekla: heh toys.
asciilifeform: kakobrekla: funny thing is, a number of the other folks where i work got top-of-the-line 'macbooks' - one had spontaneous lcd crack a few weeks later, the other - reboots by itself...
kakobrekla: you can actually upgrade some old tps to ips.
phf: what trinque said
asciilifeform: kakobrekla: yes, FUCK tn.
asciilifeform: thing is, i can entirely predict, i think, what mircea_popescu will say: 'your life choices are wrong, you should not need a laptop'
trinque: I recall before that it was IBM thinkpads
kakobrekla: and ips seems to be quite scarce among non apple. sux0r. i cant see a tn anymore.
trinque: macbook pro did seem to step into the "professional computer" role
phf: i actually think apple killed thinkpad
kakobrekla: i have a few x220 (which seem better than x230 which the girl uses)