338500+ entries in 0.199s

mircea_popescu: "[116] I have previously concluded, on a balance of probabilities,
that
these documents were intended
to illegally assert a debt against
the Officer and Alberta, and
that
the attempt
to file
the documents Powell notarized is an indictable criminal offense. Powell is obviously in breach of
the Code of Conduct."
mircea_popescu: then
the bit where he attacks
the notary is particularly precious.
mircea_popescu: gee whiz, i wonder where plaintif caught on
this idea
that "unless you so and so in 30 days you so and so"
mircea_popescu: doh. he doesn't
think you're special. because you're all equals and whatnot. what's so hard
to grasp ?
mircea_popescu: ct, s 23.1(3), should
the Minister of Justice and Attorney General wish
to do so within
that period of
time. Absent any submissions
this order will become final on November 6, 2015." <<
the best part is
that
the dude spent a while harping about how bullshit foisted agreements are bullshit ;
then went on
to do EXACTLY
the same ; and all
the while fails
to understand wtf exactly impels
the guy
to behave
thusly.
mircea_popescu: "[112] I make
the above order on an interim basis effective immediately. In keeping with
the procedure adopted in R v Fearn, at para 54, Chutskoff v Bonora, at para 138, and Lymer (Re), 2014 ABQB 696 (CanLII) at para 58, final operation of
this Order is stayed for 30 days until November 6, 2015
to allow
the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General
to make submissions
to change or vary
this order, per Judicature A
mircea_popescu: 24.(1) Every one who, having an intent
to commit an offence, does or omits
to do anything for
the purpose of carrying out
the intention is guilty of an attempt
to commit
the offence whether or not it was possible under
the circumstances
to commit
the offence."
mircea_popescu: "
The fact
that
this Court would never have entered Boisjolis materials as a default judgment
that could
then be enforced by conventional means is immaterial. Criminal Code, s 24(1) is explicit
that
the fact an attempt
to commit an offence could not succeed is irrelevant
to whether or not
that offence was attempted:
mircea_popescu: epic. civil procedure applied
to criminal code adjudications.
mircea_popescu: "For
the purposes of
this vexatious litigation decision what is important is whether or not delivering
the September 25, 2015 documents
to
the Alberta Court of Queens Bench satisfies
the actus reus and mens rea requirements of Criminal Code, s 423.1. On a balance of probabilities, I conclude
that it does."
BingoBoingo: 17 months of Qntra, with 5 of
them at
the helm... I
though I hit a significant milestone.
Then it
turns out
that either I was honestly confused for Mircea Popescu or just maybe... Luke-Jr just
tried
to steal
that milestone because he has so much contempt for me he was compelled
to steal my satisfaction.
BingoBoingo: ;;later
tell Luke-Jr Fuck yourself for editing
that reddit comment and
taking my glow away. I want you
to go
to
the grave of blessed Mary mother of Jesus and very deeply and profoundly fuck yourself.
BingoBoingo: !down Luke-Jr Before you
take my glow away
BingoBoingo: No it's Mircea doesn't have
time
to write
that much for Qntra.
Luke-Jr: wait,
that's you? I
thought it was mircea_popescu
BingoBoingo: I have no idea when I'm going
to stop glowing about recieving special contempt from Luke-Jr
BingoBoingo: Does anyone know if
there's a prize for
that
BingoBoingo: In other news
that
time you personally get called a lunatic by Luke-Jr and not just a lunatic, but
the only lunatic whose opinon doesn't matter.
https://archive.is/ChHAo BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> BingoBoingo:
the slashdot
thing is raw sewage. srsly i 'want my five minutes back' plox. << Ask gasenwagen driver for a cigarette when
the
time comes
mircea_popescu: it is provedly consistent (what'd be a "mathematical corectness" and empirically applicable with great predictive power.
that's... not it.)
mircea_popescu: and when i say "not yet seen" i mean
that in
the strongest sense. not seen ONCE. fucking darwinism is not PROVEDLY correct.
mircea_popescu: math is nice and good, but a method or mechanism
through which
to prove
the corectness of implementation in
the sense contemplated here is not yet seen and altogether may be an impossibility.
mircea_popescu: then you invalidate
the assumptions in practice without realising and heuristics eats your lunch.
mircea_popescu: moreover, it's sadly unclear what
the
task even is. yes you can rigurously define assumptions ; yes you can rigurously prove safety.
mircea_popescu: actually
the 4 color map
thing is in my head just as good if not better
than knapsack
☟︎ mircea_popescu: believe it or not, sifting all
the incoming email produced some nuggets.
mircea_popescu: and besides, i'm not asking
them
to solve it, i'm just saying, should you have a solution...
mircea_popescu: i suppose
the fiat world has burned
these poor people so consistently (see
the plouffe
thing recently discussed, see
the notorious wolfram
thing etc) it's just
the default expectation. and
then ~bitcoin~ is
the scam.
mircea_popescu: "Anyhow, it would be a bunch of work for 10 BTC. Hardly worth anyone's
time, given
this bozo is gonna
take all
the credit, you probably don't even get fame nor fortune..." << jesus almighty.
this is why it's fucking public, and lordship and all
that, right ?
mircea_popescu: what colors are your bits, bitch! and how much entropy is
there in
this dword ?
mircea_popescu: "256 bits has sufficient entropy
to render any brute force attack, and even severe weakening (e.g. sq root effort attacks) utterly infeasible." << dude where
the fuck do
they come from.
BingoBoingo: brb, stepping away from
the anti-social media
mircea_popescu: "Behold, Mr Mackey, riding a horse so naturally it makes your dick hard. And
there be bitches, oh yes." << i wonder what knowitall derp'd do if he actually knew what he's
talking about.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo
the internet is but a series of
tubes. see c) above.
mircea_popescu: mats i guess
that's right, surfer chicks do end up looking 514 by
the
time
they're out of college.
BingoBoingo: The scary
thing is she dreams of someone doing
that
to her
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo
that part is easy : a) you cook a bunch of slop ; b) you catch
the sow and chain her down ; c) you insert one
tube in ass and another
tube in mouth (should be same size, orientation indifferent) and
then you d) pour.
BingoBoingo: But I'm glad MP no longer can disbelieve
the one on
the right being 21 because "No way she's 21,
that isn't enough
time
to eat so much"
BingoBoingo: Modded +4 Interesting with "The block cipher is a proof of work function which
takes some effort
to compute."
mircea_popescu: pure conjecture, but
towards a unified
theory of cryptography!
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag honestly, i suspect a) all actual cryptography revolves around º and º' pairs and b) rsa is
the only one where º = º' = multiplication.
ascii_butugychag: (actually posing
the question often produces many little 'bill gates'-en, who famously uttered a hope
that one day 'science may discover a means of factoring large primes')
ascii_butugychag: i kinda wonder, how many of
the folks barfing, could explain how, e.g., rsa, works,
to save own life
mircea_popescu: nm
that i linked
to djb's 500-1k
typical rewards for
the field
to help
them avoid stepping in
that one.
mircea_popescu: o hey, check it out, all
the rotinculo
that live off foodstamps know what a reward sum SHOULD have been.
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> "Not satire, just stupid and wrong." lol BingoBoingo just how much derp butthurt have you produced
today ? << Less
than usual actually.
mats: was
this socat
thing even rsa?
assbot: Logged on 22-09-2015 01:22:33; asciilifeform: 'The real power,
the power we have
to fight for night and day, is not power over
things, but over men.' He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: 'How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?' Winston
thought. 'By making him suffer,' he said. 'Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is sufferin
ascii_butugychag: mircea_popescu, i suppose, is a natural-born exterminator. whereas i see crushing, poisoning vermin as hard
thankless work
mircea_popescu: i'll be honest with you : i actually prefer encountering scar
tissue
to actual people. i have many more
toys for
the former,
that i wouldn't normally apply on humans.
ascii_butugychag has been
trying
to detect 'signs of intelligent life' in
the cryptological world, a very depressing exercise
mircea_popescu: "Not satire, just stupid and wrong." lol BingoBoingo just how much derp butthurt have you produced
today ?
mircea_popescu: While its unknown how Wang chose
the prime, other commenters on
the post said
that checks in OpenSSL and other
tools used
to generate primes cannot be sure if
the numbers are prime. Rieger
told
Threatpost: I do not know if a quick way exists
to check
this definitely. No attempts were made at all. << and we never heard of phuctor etc.
mircea_popescu: "Socat said it has generated a new prime
that is 2048 bits long" << clearly evil.
mircea_popescu: ever since
the previous spammer sold my site
to
the current one people ever give less and less of a shit! oh if only i could be friends with a rich guy like slashdot!
mircea_popescu lookes over at stats ; check
that out, slashdotting counts for something like 2-3% of ordinary
trilema
traffic.
ascii_butugychag: is
there somewhere, i wonder, a perl script,
that pastes
this pediwikian claptrap in
ascii_butugychag: Proving hardness is something you do for asymmetrical ciphers, but asymmetrical ciphers are way
too slow
to be useful for actual messages.'
ascii_butugychag: 'Also, he awards bonus points for proofs of hardness. No one has managed
to prove hardness for any existing block cipher. Block ciphers are simply ways
to jumble
the plaintext up in a reversible fashion.
They are not based on difficult mathematical problems.