316400+ entries in 0.219s
kakobrekla: yes, however i repeat:
the condition
to self-voice is no longer L1>0 || L2>0 but instead L1 + L2 > 0
kakobrekla: l1 is unchanged but for one
to be in l2 one must be rated by l1
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla i don't rightly understand what
this midway solution actually is. so if l1 is empty,
then how is l2 defined. and if l1 isn't empty
then... what ?
kakobrekla: not really a democracy but
there is no more immutability for l1
mircea_popescu: i'm about as interested in participating in democracy of any kind or description as you can imagine. #b-a existed
to any degree and in any sense for as long as it wasn't
that. it can go back
to being #okcupid or whatever
the fuck else
the "power of
the people" warrants.
kakobrekla: that being said, i believe b-a should be self regulating and not depended on what mp or kako
thinks,
the solution, already in effect, is:
the condition
to self-voice is no longer L1>0 || L2>0 but instead L1 + L2 > 0, which also goes along
the notion
that lordship no longer exists.
the power is your hands now, people.
☟︎ assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 23:35:36; mircea_popescu: i dunno, but
the fact remains
this nonsense can't continue, if for no reason
then because i won't be any part of
the most recent attempt of fiat world
to reclaim
the republic. so for
the sake of variety, let's go with : kakobrekla, you willing
to
take nubbins off
the l1 ?
kakobrekla:
http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2016#1439692 < and i actually suspect, given your recent reckless behaviour followed by destructive actions you have been compromised by
that very same fiat system and are on a good way of dismantling
the republic (simulate a world where mp admits a mistake and eats his own cooking and see how it compares
to
this)
☝︎☟︎ assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 23:35:31; mircea_popescu: 2 requires
the man who just saw
the product of his not-inconsequential efforts die over "not doing what mp says, with money" have
to choose whether
to do what mp says... but with people,
this
time. we did in fact start
this channel
together, just like bitbet, and he did do a lot of infrastructure work here, just as
there. so... what do ?
kakobrekla:
http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2016#1439691 << haha! how pretentious. its almost as entertaining as
the miners konspiraci. anyway, unlike bitbet which was a shared
toy between us and was damaged beyond repair by your foolish actions for which you dont care
to
take responsibility (but will be, on
the end, enforecd upon you), let
the record state #b-a is solely my creation and you inhabited
the chan a week or so later. and yes,
☝︎☟︎ assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for bingoboingo from 2
to 3.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for pete_dushenski from 2
to 1.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for phf from 1
to 3.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for davout from 3
to 4.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for rye from 3
to 2.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for
trinque from 3
to 4.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for jurov from 3
to 4.
assbot: Successfully updated
the rating for chetty from 2
to 10 with note: will never sin again
pete_dushenski to his non-autonomous car
to
take a cruise
this fine spring evening
pete_dushenski: though i admit it's a bit strange
that we're not on 19ghz boxes in
the back seats of our autonomous cars...
pete_dushenski: but ya, being as rich as i
thought i ~wanted~
to be by
this point would not doubt cause as many problems as i imagined it'd solve. besides, what fucking problems ??
trinque: better
to learn
to be a man first
than suddenly have so much gunpowder
pete_dushenski: lol more
than a few of us probably also
thought we'd be riding
the btc-waves
to being deca+millionaires by 2016.
this bitcoin
thing is
taking far longer
than i, at least, had anticipated.
mircea_popescu: and
to be perfectly clear - it ~was~ my stupid fucking idea of seeding
the lordship off
the stats page on roughly
the basis of activity
that got us in
this mess.
☟︎ danielpbarron: if just one more switches from positive
to negative we can see once and for all if a lord can be !down'd
pete_dushenski: anyways, my rating him made no goddam sense
to begin with
danielpbarron: aw
that's only a single click, but better
than nothing
pete_dushenski: after skipping half of
today's lengthy logs myself, i'm all
too happy
to do my part
danielpbarron: only 3 more clicks.
That's
two changing
their mind, or 3 making
theirs up
mircea_popescu: i dunno, but
the fact remains
this nonsense can't continue, if for no reason
then because i won't be any part of
the most recent attempt of fiat world
to reclaim
the republic. so for
the sake of variety, let's go with : kakobrekla, you willing
to
take nubbins off
the l1 ?
☟︎ mircea_popescu: 2 requires
the man who just saw
the product of his not-inconsequential efforts die over "not doing what mp says, with money" have
to choose whether
to do what mp says... but with people,
this
time. we did in fact start
this channel
together, just like bitbet, and he did do a lot of infrastructure work here, just as
there. so... what do ?
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: 1 has
the manifest disadvantage
that it is an exact replay of
the bitbet drama. it may be argued
that it is "clean" and "elegant" and "all i wanted was
to protect you, son", which is so much idiotic patriarchical nonsense it makes my skin crawl - and
thus let's extend kakobrekla in public
the same sympathies extended in private ;
mircea_popescu: reviewing
that, i can either 1) log as mod and ban
the schmuck or else 2) ask kakobrekla
to alter
the l1.
mircea_popescu: while it is incontrivable
that
the lordship has failed utterly, and is in no sense
the guarantor of keeping spammers and idiots away from
the forum as intended (youhadonejob.png!!!),
that is a distinct and separate problem from what
to do with #b-a.
mircea_popescu: mk, so upon consideration,
the issue here is
that me nulling
the logs is at best a stopgap, and no sort of long
term or
tenable solution.
there's certainly no sense in me continuing
to pour words into a bag i won't read
the logs of, wtf.
assbot: Logged on 08-03-2016 18:12:51; asciilifeform: nubbins`: dead pilots in
the '30s-'40s were sometimes found with
the control joystick literally
torn from its moorings.
they pulled against jammed flight surfaces and physically destroyed
the stick. it did not help.
jurov: mrottenkolber: it's fine, as long as
this won't cause V
to
take up complexity from git
assbot: Logged on 18-01-2016 16:15:45; ascii_butugychag: btw i hope everybody understands
that life with 'v' is always going
to resemble dark age blood sports like cvs, etc. far more
than modern greased poles (e.g., 'git')
mrottenkolber: Should be enough
to produce vdiffs and signatures from git repos, for whoever might want
that, and god forbid, press “v signed” branches from Git (ducks).
pete_dushenski: BingoBoingo: purist would argue
that NA (1st ge) was
the only
true miata, but
that ND (4th gen, MY2016) is a strong return
to form.
nubbins`: i just started keeping
track of what i ate
BingoBoingo: pete_dushenski: No.
The most recent
thing
They've attached
the name
to in
the US is clearly not actually a Miata. I'm not invested enough in
the question
though
to make a hard determination on when
the newer vehicles stopped becoming miatas
BingoBoingo: pete_dushenski: It's just a shame
they've stopped making new Miatas
pete_dushenski: when all
the world's an obeast,
the skinny girl looks like a freak, aha
BingoBoingo: pete_dushenski:
The miata's just one of
those vehicles
that looks worse
than it should because of poor aesthetic direction on other motor vehicles
nubbins` goes
to print layer 7 of new btc posters
pete_dushenski: BingoBoingo:
two bucks says
that
the miata owner is not
the least bit displeased
that
two honies romped around in his ride. he's surely sorry he missed it! jealous wife, on
the other hand...
pete_dushenski: it addresses exactly
the "can i pick it up if it's dropped?" question
danielpbarron: which I
think is made clear enough by
the line about how it's
the sole discression of MPEx
to decide how
to resolve issues
danielpbarron: the only one who can violate an MPEx listing agreement is
the non-MPEx party signing it
jurov: the rules apparently is
that if he claims
that was not a mistake but mining cartel,
that is beyond discussion.
danielpbarron: you just said
the rules go against your values, jurov ; not
that he made an error
nubbins`: "you need
to get
the rats out of
the kitchen and
then later you'll want
to make a meal
there? i
think not"
jurov: you're under impression i'm
trying
to oust him? just by reminding him he may have done an error?
danielpbarron: so what
then, you need
to oust
the current rule maker and
then
this place will be worth inhabiting? I
think not.
jurov: and
that not even for a good discernible reason
jurov: no,
the very rules going against my values
danielpbarron: jurov, what happened again and again? people not following
the rules? How is
the a strike against
the rule maker?
danielpbarron: punkman, indeed
that might be why private addresses became a
thing. account holders signing agreement
that anything sent
to
that address gets credited
to account. Since we know
that
there are side-contracts for
the less-than-50-btc renewal of keys,
this should be possible
jurov: but
this happened again and again, bitbet being last case
punkman: considering everyone is using private addresses
these days, I wonder if donations are still a
thing
jurov: i just can't run business
that way
jurov: this was made deliberate by design and easy
to avoid
danielpbarron: what's
the issue? MPEx says send X. Guy sends Y instead.
jurov: sorry: *wences sending rounded amount and
then suing over fiduciary responsibility
jurov: wences sending rounded amoutn and
the suing over fiduciary responisibility
punkman: nubbins`: i actually didn't realize mp owned assbot << I
thought kakobrekla owned assbot
jurov: with label "whatever falls in, is donation
to shareholders"
jurov: it goes back long
time
to
things like
the wences lawsuit, i likened
the situation
to mpex having a sinkhole in
the foyer
jurov: i wish i got some sound reasoning here,
too