289200+ entries in 0.208s

mircea_popescu: i am actually suspecting something like
this exists in ethereum, but meh, not worth
the chase atm.
mircea_popescu: anyway, it's mostly "cloud" bullshit anyway, so don't regard any of
this as peculiarly reliable info.
mircea_popescu: which
they intend
to CHANGE anyway, so it's a bit iffy
to bake for
the idiots.
mircea_popescu: anyway,
they use some shit supposedly memory hard, whatever.
mircea_popescu: it's not altogether clear anyone bothered
to bake one yet.
mircea_popescu: "yes, under arbitrary restrains you propose on random particular avenue,
things can't be done"
tm.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform
the
top article contains comment saying guy got 17mh on one core out of 5 on modest card.
mircea_popescu: understand : ethereum pretends
to be 1/10 of btc financially, while it is 1/10`000`000 hash-wise and outright 1/infinity
technologically.
mircea_popescu: it's almost like
the seeds of disaster are by now epigenetic,
the population carries
them like
the swine carry ascari lumbricoides.
mircea_popescu: how
the ever living fuck,
they're not smart enough ?!
they're not educated enough, not experienced enough,
mircea_popescu: "anyone who ever gets 51% can fuck up
this historical item worth
this many mn coins. hurr!"
mircea_popescu: this, incidentally, is EXACTLY what
technology debt means. apply bullshit "fixes" as MIT & co bright minds produce,
mircea_popescu: they can do whatever
they want. 51% means
they don't get
to have an opinion.
mircea_popescu: let's follow
this. so i mine
the next block. 49% guy mines
the 2nd. i build on mine.
mircea_popescu: (it went up by about 4x since last year. hardware's
the most expensive part of a scamcoin.)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform ethereum difficulty is, if memory serves, ~50TH. so about half
that.
a111: Logged on 2016-06-23 14:30 Framedragger: (e.g. i agree with chomsky's "There is a notion of success ... which I
think is novel in
the history of science. It interprets success as approximating unanalyzed data." which does indeed suck.)
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-06-23#1488111 <<
the guy's defense, notably, "yes it's collecting butterflies -
there's nothing wrong with
that" is actually
tendentious. it's NOT collecting butterflies. yes, it COULD BE, but i don't see any of
that happening. just a bunch of "we have butterflies in
this black box, come hear about our weight loss ideas"
typically ustarded marketing and "engineering"
☝︎ phf: oh, shit, sorry, i'm late for something, i'll pick up
this conversation later
phf: right
this very moment, probably nothing
phf: i find 1s eval delays unacceptable when i'm in
the zone
☟︎ phf: well,
then you should continue working with it :)
phf: main
thing sbcl did is improve build system at
the expense of some of
the subsystems (an interpret mainly)
phf: well,
tradeoffs
that sbcl made are more in line with modern practices, so
there was a
transition from old and stodgy cmucl
to new and shiny sbcl
phf: cmucl doesn't have
threads not because it's a baby system. it doesn't have
threads because sbcl both made adding functionality of
that nature easier and canibalized developers from cmucl
phf: well, native
threads were added
to sbcl at
the expense of good gc
phf: you only say
that because you
think sbcl is somehow "clean". chrodes managed a very neat hack, a build system improvement,
that's where neat hacks have ended, and modernization began, but it's not like
the legacy cmucl codebase somehow disappeared from sbcl
phf: i once managed
to follow rainer joswig's instructions
to bring cl-
http up, but i couldn't reproduce it last
time i
tried
phf: (a much harder
task in hunchentoot)
phf: well,
to be fair it's not very good, but it hosted cliki for 10 years, easier
to hack on
than hunchentoot on account of having simpler design and i'm
trying
to make it sling byte arrays
ben_vulpes: and it's *still*
too newfangled hipster by some metrics.
ben_vulpes: > latest patch
to source
tree from january 2006
trinque: what www
thinger do you use? hunchenfart?
phf: killing a couple of
threads "fixed"
the issues, but i'm not sure what
the problem was :/
phf: oh, interesting,
that's odd
mats: have
there been any other 1k+ btc 'coin destruction' events like
the one orchestrated by counterparty?
trinque: or
they just find loose cannons and groom
them for a while