27000+ entries in 0.084s
PeterL: <asciilifeform> but if any of them had seen it fit to return so much as one satoshi of the doublesend - i assume
mircea_popescu, kakobrekla, or davout would have mentioned. << If I did want to return part of doublespend, where would I send it and be sure MP does not just pocket it?
ben_vulpes:
mircea_popescu issued a receipt and all
BingoBoingo:
mircea_popescu: Well the stop drinking thing was a rather substantive change in the usual. I think reduced the N in my SNR, but I'm not entirely sure.
davout:
mircea_popescu: i can make one
davout: btw, is
mircea_popescu in a position to transfer the bitbet.us domain?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 15:37:30;
mircea_popescu: the result is that your dream diverges from reality by that much, and it's not clear breaches OF THAT NATURE can ever be healed.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 15:03:51;
mircea_popescu: "the simplest"
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 14:06:24;
mircea_popescu: anyway, take it from a software design perspective. you are proposing to change the stateless parser (bet accepted) -> (bet resolved) -> (bet paid out) into a stateful and undefined (bet accepted) -> (bet resolved) -> (???) -> (some thing paid according to some rules you can't know)
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 13:56:37;
mircea_popescu: fine, if you absolutely must : suppose owner made an agreement with a third party that the nth txn goes to x and the nth+1 goes to y. are they now bound to revise their agreements on the basis of how you may wish to liberally reinterpret the protocol ?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 14:20:36;
mircea_popescu: solrodar there's no bitcoin precedent of "unjust enrichment", and if it is introduced it applies first of all to all miners.
davout:
mircea_popescu: that way does sound like a good way!
davout:
mircea_popescu: epic convo :D
solrodar:
mircea_popescu: the bettors entered a contract with bitbet, then you, acting on bitbet's behalf, paid them too much by mistake. Even if there's no property in bitcoin, doesn't the existence of that contract allow you to introduce an argument of unjust enrichment?
davout:
mircea_popescu: i guess i did when i said 'bettor'
davout:
mircea_popescu: you haven't provided any support for the notion of "a fellow" that you introduced, or did i miss it?
solrodar:
mircea_popescu: aren't you the one that always argues that there are no people, only keys? In which case there's nothing wrong with recovering money from keys. If the key is controlled by multiple people, that's their problem.
solrodar: so we say
mircea_popescu controlled a large quantity of bitcoin, and had agreed to consider a certain quantity of it the property of bitbet, but that concept of property does not go beyond any agreement which may have existed between him and bitbet?
nubbins`: whether their name is snackman or
mircea_popescu diametric:
mircea_popescu: i'll let you know if i develop popcorn lung
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2016 00:31:03;
mircea_popescu: it's actually a pretty serious health risk. the plasticisers / other treatments that make the 3d feedstock behave sufficiently like ink are all items of concern in food chain.
assbot: Logged on 22-03-2016 20:56:07;
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes happens to me all the time! then alf runs off and invents it and i'm like fuuuu wasn't this on trilema!
assbot: Logged on 22-03-2016 20:49:10;
mircea_popescu: if someone, as oft is the case for say mod6, is trying to make the whole pile of what was said abvout X, they encounter a very present difficulty.
mircea_popescu: !v assbot:
mircea_popescu.rate.mrottenkolber.1:7ae7bb4fe0a9bf41b838dc065d19fceca42142f999e7016fa2cd143e92a2412f
assbot: Logged on 22-11-2015 06:30:10;
mircea_popescu: abstraction is loss. you throw out all sorts of stuff and hope&pray that it wasn't actually needed.
davout:
mircea_popescu: maybe use log.b-a.com for that purpose? how would pm tagging work?
mrottenkolber:
mircea_popescu: No, sorry, still mumbling aout the why I am in b-a
hanbot:
mircea_popescu you know that line gave me pause at the time, but i figured he was entertaining the noisebox so what do i know what he's answering to. all in all though, pretty odd.
hanbot:
mircea_popescu i'm really interested in 'em, dead or alive.
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 07:43:11;
mircea_popescu: hanbot mod6 maybe an extension to deedbot where people could go !tag <string> and then a collection of clickable tags is published somewhere, each leading to a list of loglines ?
phf: <
mircea_popescu> [20:02:06] i am currently of the " ' technology won't be solving human problems ' has been deeply abused and is taking its pound of flesh" school of thought. << i failed to parse, you saying "technology won't solve" has been overused, and there's need to lean in opposite direction?
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 23:50:23;
mircea_popescu: for the record, and to revisit that old definition of "public" ie the forum vs "private" ie the gynacaeum, something is public when it has what has been here referred to as a "real" part. ie, when it is possible to make a definition for it that is meaningful for everyone.
jurov: yes, and withdrawing.. and i have to ping
mircea_popescu again
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 23:11:33;
mircea_popescu: in a different restatement, people "willing to take responsibility for their actions" only has an imaginary part, and no real part ; for the necessary reason that responsibility can not be defined coherently in the real space.
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 19:50:15;
mircea_popescu: and it is cheaper for this group to put forth an ideology than to do any actual investigative work
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 19:50:15;
mircea_popescu: and it is cheaper for this group to put forth an ideology than to do any actual investigative work
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 19:49:37;
mircea_popescu: yeah, sure, not a difficult one for as long as one lives on imaginary half mil a year and theorizes away. in practice, it will not be seen, nor has it.
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 19:48:46;
mircea_popescu: and, importantly, if it WERE to fail, how would we resolve the problem if it is or it isn't your fault.
mod6:
mircea_popescu: formally, a group would have to be constructed to investigate and analyze failures and place blame where beyond required -- if it can be proved beyond any doubt.
mod6:
mircea_popescu: well, indeed. i mean, i can "swear and affirm" that my code won't fail you, but really, I can't be certain one way or another. too many variables.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> this patch has 'all signers:
mircea_popescu trinque asciilifeform mod6' << i'll note that this signatures you're referencing are strictly for genesis.vpatch
assbot: Logged on 10-11-2015 22:25:29;
mircea_popescu: ie, there, "it's not the job of the state to protect the cultural patrimony OF INDIVIDUALS and their clans ; if those individuals and clans are so degenerate, bankrupt and chlorotioc as to no longer be able to protect their heritage, let the worms havce it. no, not even for comunist metaphisics ; no, the property of x isn't "ours", no x's history isn't "ours". let them uphold it or let it die.
mod6: <+
mircea_popescu> hanbot mod6 maybe an extension to deedbot where people could go !tag <string> and then a collection of clickable tags is published somewhere, each leading to a list of loglines ? << This could work -- it's in the vein of the 'BUTTSECKS' flag. Which seems simple enough. And the given topic-'tag' is a decent idea, i.e. 'OOM' or 'Cramer-Shoup' or 'keccak'
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 07:47:15;
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo i have traveled to africa. unless one means specially designated experimental lab (some towns in south africa etc), internet connection is poor.
assbot: Logged on 21-03-2016 07:43:11;
mircea_popescu: hanbot mod6 maybe an extension to deedbot where people could go !tag <string> and then a collection of clickable tags is published somewhere, each leading to a list of loglines ?