log☇︎
263000+ entries in 0.17s
mircea_popescu: no question, it surely is tractable.
asciilifeform: i will observe that, e.g., new york times front page, has 1,001 new faux-people every morning. whereas here we get 0. and so in principle the problem is tractable.
thestringpuller: This is how I imagine MP and ALF when talking in channel. Makes work less boring: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/02/Statler_and_Waldorf.jpg
mircea_popescu: the beauty of language is that it allows this sort of analysis.
mircea_popescu: oh. well, the same way everything else is done, you match against the structure and increment a counter.
asciilifeform: 'esteemed sir, the defective transistors were packaged separately for your convenience.'
mircea_popescu: "i want my theory to work therefore network anchors aren't people, evidently"
asciilifeform: how is this even in principle possible ?
mircea_popescu: do you ever count how much of this "i want this not that therefore the facts are so and so" you do in an average day ?
mircea_popescu: the talking heads are 0cost faux people ; and most of their subject matter, from hussein bahamas down.
mircea_popescu: and to revisit <asciilifeform> fact is, enemy has not yet devised a means of making faux people at 0cost. : please watch the news sometime.
mircea_popescu: but the whole fucking point of technology is to broadly open new cunts.
mircea_popescu: anyway. the "suffices" thing is all a matter of who's attacking you and why. keeping each other's balances in excel spreadsheets also "Suffices".
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform there is no "kind" you racist lout you.
mircea_popescu: anyway, yes asciilifeform has a point in that penis makes for a fine way to make friends. the thing is that as i near 40, i'd dearly love some alternative method. this thing won't last forever.
asciilifeform: let the covertresses live with own kind. and the knuthes - own. etc
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: i don't grasp the need for a global 'humanity filter.' working wotronics implies that folks will assortively peer by degree of muppetry, and this imho suffices.
mircea_popescu isn't in the business of driving people nuts.
mircea_popescu: trinque my shit is uniquely confusing. i call them slaves, because it is the proper term. yet they have more personal freedom and general, intellectual and otherwise independence than any "liberated" hear-her-roar-in-english-only.
mircea_popescu: and of course, the discussion is carried in terms of go but isn't ABOUT go. it's about "human only tasks"
asciilifeform: incidentally, less time than it takes to tell man from muppet by playing go (how many folks even play above 1995 computer level ? does mircea_popescu ? )
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: now there is a 'complicated' 'let's talk for five minutes'.
trinque did wonder about the magic which kept many women in close quarters with each other without killing each other
mircea_popescu: now there isn't really.
mircea_popescu: prior to the sedol debacle, there was a simple "let's play go" solution to human vs machine
asciilifeform: it works on a narrow and well-defined toy problem.
asciilifeform: i dun see how the go machine relates.
mircea_popescu: new girls can go for years without meeting most of the others ; forget all.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform it'd surprise you to find that less than half my harem finds itself in my presence at any given time.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yes, but with the go algo it's come pretty damned close.
mircea_popescu: fuck that. i been there, done that, it's enough to run a smallish trown and no more.
mircea_popescu: really, you want your source of power to be chats in coffee shops ?
asciilifeform: which does not have such a thing as 0-cost sybilmaking.
mircea_popescu: ie, "you just want to and someone else gotta do the work now"
asciilifeform: it recurses to meatspace.
mircea_popescu: that the problem recurses to oldkey now.
asciilifeform: incidentally what the hell is wrong with 'i won't answer message from $newkey unless an $oldkey vouched for him' ?
mircea_popescu: and this "making attacks costly" is exactly mining, any way you turn it.
mircea_popescu: the reality of the wot is that it provides the tools to make, perhaps, attacks unfeasibly costly. PERHAPS.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform no, that's the whole delusion of wot, in the minds of aspiring shamans such as yourself.
Framedragger: hm, true.
mircea_popescu: there's a reason you feed your horse with your own hand, even if you don't have to.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: ~entire point of wotronics is to eliminate 'field of worms as far as the eye can see in all directions' as a thing of this world.
mircea_popescu: Framedragger people want, sensibly, to reduce the things they worry about. however, they often get confused in between things they could not worry about but have to, and things they can't not worry about but don't have to.
a111: Logged on 2016-09-06 15:39 mircea_popescu: http://log.mkj.lt/trilema/20160906/from:150/to:150#150 << if you go to all the trouble of building multiple freestanding items, why then vulnerabilize them so. the idea is to take the bikeshed out, not import it forever.
Framedragger: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-09-06#1534898 << i guess that *would* then be a truly single point of failure, in terms of historical reliability, hm. not an easy problem ☝︎
asciilifeform: quite certainly not. but if he is found worthy by all concentric N circles of L_n wot arount razi, then he is worth testing.
asciilifeform: to get through 10,000,001 enemy meat puppets, the would-be proselyte will have to fight his way through jungle, desert, etc.
mircea_popescu: the weakness of this scheme is exactly as described : fuzzing and the binary tree propagates a few through it all the way to you.
mircea_popescu: who, perhaps, in turn.
mircea_popescu: the thing you do not wish to say, because you do not wish it to be turned to dust under scrutiny, is that razi is either dead, or else depends on sub-razis-1 through n
a111: Logged on 2014-10-16 00:01 asciilifeform: consider ancient scholars like the persian Razi.
asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2014-10-16#876727 << where i address the point. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: then address the points.
mircea_popescu: well if you won't read and address the points there we'll have to stop here, i'm not restating it.
asciilifeform: spam raises the bar to 'i want to be a man', yes. but cannot raise it infinitely high.
mircea_popescu: the moment you stop this, you're too old for life.
mircea_popescu: so then your gossipd just died ?
mircea_popescu: seriously read that 2nd link.
mircea_popescu: yes. but how do you distinguish the one that isn't, from the one that merely appears not to be, from the other 9999 ?
mircea_popescu: spam was always point-driven. it's easy to fight the man who wants to steal.
asciilifeform: if there were 10,001 covertresses, i would read ~none~ of them
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: we already did this exercise. in 1990s. it was called spam.
mircea_popescu: your brain will pick patterns, and now i managed to get a few inside through fuzzing.
asciilifeform: (for the most part, i don't. except that one time there was this odd parrot-like... etc)
a111: Logged on 2016-08-17 17:02 mircea_popescu: Framedragger the reason there's a lot of credence in phf's perhaps harsh criticism is http://trilema.com/2014/how-to-make-money-on-the-internet-while-pretending-you-know-what-youre-talking-about-and-accumulating-a-legion-of-mindless-followers-for-fun-and-profit/
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-08-17#1523269 << re-read this, and think about it. if i want to attack you, i make literally a trillion names ; then i sort them in binary tries like that ; then i send them to chatter at you. ☝︎
asciilifeform: same way i distinguish between the birds in my oak tree.
mircea_popescu: how do you currently distinguish between two names ?
asciilifeform: why would you or i wot to any of him.
mircea_popescu: you understand HOW music changed from music to idiocy, yes ?
asciilifeform: (how else would there be any connection between the sybils and actual people?)
mircea_popescu: no, he's be using the algo that beat sedol to create as many accounts as his electricity can power, and fuzz everyone out.
mircea_popescu: the armsrace is still there ; subtlier.
mircea_popescu: at least on appearances. but now model what someone trying to sybil would be doing.
mircea_popescu: no no. the sense is correct.
asciilifeform: in that sense BingoBoingo pulling weeds in his corn field is 'mining'
mircea_popescu: ie, what makes my knowledge secure and the third party's knowledge dubious is... the people who i know to mine it \for me.
mircea_popescu: yeah, as contemplated in gossipd there is no difficulty. but mining, still exists.
a111: Logged on 2016-05-16 14:04 mircea_popescu: similarily, the ACTUAL order of message, and the presence or absence of "j/k" messages in there can a) never be established beyond reasonable doubt and b) can only be usefully guessed by people. which is to say, well connected, intelligent nodes.
asciilifeform: i am speaking of 'mining' in the bitcoin sense, where a stranger can connect and shoot your difficulty to pluto and leave, etc.
mircea_popescu: lemme dig it up then.
mircea_popescu: in fact, mining is included in the gossipd implementation of privacy ; re-read the example given there to phf.
mircea_popescu: it's the feeling of "i've just been indescribably stupid."
asciilifeform: the reason i occasionally return to the idea in my notebook is that it is the only solution i know of thus far to the idiocy of mining.
mircea_popescu: "mechanized" is stupidified, generally. careful with mecanizing stuff for the sake of feeling like you just came out of a us college.
Framedragger: i recall someone attempting an implementation / spec of this 'everyone has their own currency' thing. just with wot being less central to it, perhaps
asciilifeform: Framedragger: iirc nothing further came from this line of thought, to date, it is only interesting as gedankenexperiment.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: for some reason i cannot turn up the thread. but idea was something like a crackpot generalization of the idea of altcoins, i.e. every node can issue obligatory notes, if you will, in whatever qty, and their worth rests wholly on wot graph relations of that node, and strictly to his peers
mircea_popescu: apparently this is a phase.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform "i want to send penny wtihout bank" "bitcoin" "oh, without blockchaion, maybe little bank" "use little bank" "no, all these things have the disadvantage that they don't include my 3yo self in a central manner sufficiently"
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: 'i want to send penny without bank' 'use my bank'
Framedragger: asciilifeform: multidimensional in what way? simply that it'd have many parameters; or that there'd be many cliques / 'issuers' / whateva?
mircea_popescu: you jus' wanna turn nodes into networks ?
PeterL: I was just trying to think of a way to standardize between multiple nodes
mircea_popescu: PeterL and this doesn't suggest to you the solution in search of problem angle ?
thestringpuller: yes lets put on our VR headset to send my bff 5 bucks for a beer :D
PeterL: well, yes, eulora could be one of the nodes in such a network
mircea_popescu: you can pay one satoshi instantly and without blockchain bloat. today. go, do.
PeterL: I was thinking it could be used to facilitate micropayments, things too small to deserve blockchain space