236100+ entries in 0.171s

mircea_popescu: svg however better - it can be read, as
text, and drawn, by hand. png, not so much.
mircea_popescu: so no, png in no sense better
than svg in
this
theoretical approach.
mircea_popescu: yes, but if nic is never plugged and you never import
turds - doesn'\t work
mircea_popescu: yes, per image load - if you don't have
them, image won't load.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform are you nuts ? libpng eats 10mb+ of www
turds!
phf: asciilifeform: nothing at
this point, none of
the xml parses uses DTDs (as predicted by naggum)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i could readily reduce
the svg if you wish, most of it is dreamweaver-style pointless
tagging
☟︎ mircea_popescu: hang on dawg, we're just
trying
to figure shit out here
mircea_popescu: ill report in a sec, machine currently hosed painting
the svg over 200k x 200k canvas
mircea_popescu: you first debased
then concat'd and it still worked ?!
jurov: i de-base64 each one,
then concat and i can open it fine
jurov: then it decodes and i can view
the svg
mircea_popescu: convertor cut it in half, which considering we went from binary
to readable format is pretty performanc.
mircea_popescu: there's no way
to make an arbitrarily complex schematic fit in an arbitrarily short space.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform look, saying "the v is not allowing x char sequence i wanna use" is one
thing. saying "o woes i have
this here book of 5mn chars and i want it
to be readable in 3 minutes" is another
thing.
mircea_popescu: phf i have nfi what he's on about. seems
to me
totally broken gimp install.
phf: mircea_popescu: no, but your svg works with mac's default
tooling
trinque: I am discussing a supposed
tmsr sign format
that does not have but a header and payload
trinque: wtf if I invalidate #1
that says nothing of #21
mircea_popescu: it seriously looks good. even your 10K for R5 is
there
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform get a working gimp ? i dunno what
to say. mine eats it, i am looking at a 1960x2490 version of it atm, looks fine
trinque just made it
to
the surface.
trinque: I signed his signed
thing is already done
trinque: what's
the problem with a P sig header appearing inside another ?
phf: which is probably ballpark what vectorizing
those dxf's produces (probably with significant info loss)
mircea_popescu: anyway, "png as v format" is inept beyond belief. let alone "i wish
to inspect
this matter and can't use my eyes", it's worse : "suppose i want
this
to be 3x as large" "oh can't do
that". well da fuck.
a111: Logged on 2016-12-11 19:14 phf: binary blobs remain an unsolved problem.
the whole idea of binary (or base64) is contrary
to some of
the more philosophical aspects of vpatch you and mp like
to discuss, so i don't know if base64 even solves it.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform why aren't
these schematics svg anyway btw ?
a111: Logged on 2016-12-11 19:05 asciilifeform: i have nfi right now what
to do with
this nonsense.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform hey it's not my fault you keep going around starting fires! oh what does
this button do, oh what if we made own hardware, oh etc!
mircea_popescu: while xml is shit, it's not directly clear
that
the correct move here isn't, eg,
to make a
tmsr-cad format.
phf: so my proposed "put everything into prelude" solution preserves
the literacy angle, and uses prelude as a "annotation" section, i.e. space for verbiage, supporting material etc.
this will work for free with
things like btcbase. can also pack it into a
tar file and sign ~that~, but breaks a lot of
tools
mircea_popescu: ie,
the reason koch-gpg-clearsing worked ok for us for a long
time is
that while flawed as alf correctly (and repeatedly for a year now) points out, nevertheless its hole falls atop a hole of v, namely
that it doesn't do "-----"
phf: mircea_popescu: well,
the way i got what you grokked from v when it originally came out, is
that vpatches are literate, for
things
that you can reason ~and meaningfully amend~. "unicode on a chalkboard"
thread is also relevant
mircea_popescu: the whole point we're
trying
to get out of is
that adhocness
mircea_popescu: so
then "it always can be done in particular" is no asnwer, is it ?
jurov: there's also svg using data uri, where you can put all data on one line,
thus avoiding +++ on line start problem