2700+ entries in 0.128s
copumpkin: it's not really our responsibility to educate you
copumpkin: what else is a european stereotype?
copumpkin: take mircea_popescu, stereotypical european
copumpkin: and I take it you make a point of seeking out articles from sources that might not necessarily reflect your political leanings and preconceived notions, right?
copumpkin: whence comes your information on said european attitude then?
copumpkin: so you were fully aware of that aspect of "european culture" while you were visting, a long time ago?
copumpkin: Bane_Capital: have you been to europe?
copumpkin: you make an excellent argument and I concede
copumpkin: so you either need to have too much BRK-A, or too little
copumpkin: you can't do that, because you don't have fractional shares
copumpkin: say you have some criterion for picking an optimal portfolio, and the optimal portfolio wants 1.3 shares of BRK-A
copumpkin: that's what I was saying is more efficient
copumpkin: Smoovious: what's wrong with having loads of tiny shares?
copumpkin: if you're not going to let people take fractional shares, having lots of small shares is almost as good :)
copumpkin: Smoovious: what's wrong with that?
copumpkin: reporting smaller crossed orders can be exact
copumpkin: well, if you report the aggregate active order, you need to talk about the average price it executed at
copumpkin: that would explain them coming in batches and being comparatively small
copumpkin: mircea_popescu: does MPEX report a separate trade for all orders crossed?
copumpkin: I think it's like mtgox, where if your order for X crosses 100 small orders during execution, all of them get reported
copumpkin: it's pretty standard practice to make a ladder of orders
copumpkin: pfft, black scholes is so last century
copumpkin: Chaang-Noi: so do you still think I'm a terrible person?
copumpkin: Diablo-D3: you had your due process
copumpkin: is that he spelled its with an apostrophe
copumpkin: I get an internal server error if I click
copumpkin: he makes some excellent points, and I think that NASA should address them
copumpkin: kakobrekla: I have a friend who runs a website that disproves the moon landing
copumpkin: I've been eating that for a while too
copumpkin: Smoovious: is it the shit that michael jackson has been munching on for the past couple of decades?
copumpkin: and you'll be able to fit everything
copumpkin: kakobrekla: you mean dog on the forum?
copumpkin: smickles: does it mean anything to you if I say "divs on CFF under GAAP?"
copumpkin: I'm saying make it clear on the site what we're signing up for :P
copumpkin: I shouldn't have to read the thread on the forum if I'm trying to use your site to raise capital :)
copumpkin: nefario: anyway, I'm just saying, make it more clear
copumpkin: nefario: yes, that's possible, but the question is why _you_'re the one making the call
copumpkin: that's something for the law to do, if anything
copumpkin: not something you can take away because you decide
copumpkin: it's usually assumed that my company is mine
copumpkin: you need to make it clear that people listing their securities on your exchange are accepting your pseudolegal oversight as well as your exchange services
copumpkin: I think it's just misleading, honestly
copumpkin: can you show me where on the TOS it allows you to do this?
copumpkin: nefario: he's asking you now. Why is that not enough?
copumpkin: nefario: I just mean that you're using the TOS as an excuse to not show shareholders in one case, but then unilaterally move in and make an executive decision regarding DMC
copumpkin: nefario: so you can't show people their shareholders because you'd need to change the TOS, but you can do this?
copumpkin: Chaang-Noi now thinks I'm dishonest!
copumpkin: they even accuse me of being a scamer!
copumpkin: Diablo-D3: I wouldn't take it too personally. It's a raging lynchmob on there
copumpkin: but it's buried in a sea of diarrhea