log☇︎
219800+ entries in 0.145s
asciilifeform: iirc there was a mircea_popescu parable where someone attaches a parasite to a wife and somebody else objects to removing, because 'how do you know where it ends and other it begins'
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes do you mind ? i'm having a quality moment here with the alf.
mircea_popescu: omfg the original code is priviledged what part of this is hard to grasp!!1
asciilifeform: i killed those right after baking the genesis ☟︎
mircea_popescu: the thing gavin thought constitutes the basis of his importance.
mircea_popescu: it's a cheap and welcome cut, reduces the codebase, that and the idiotic "alert messages" are certainly next to snip
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: existing code is privileged omfg what part of this is hard to grasp
mircea_popescu: i think he was just being contrarian, isn't seriously holding the position.
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: how do you square this "someone mighta" with "nothing for allcomers", and in particular "a specific thing for nobody"?
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: panda fur gasket on there for a reason!
ben_vulpes: heat flux through butt on gold toilet turns out -- not pleasant
asciilifeform: no golden toilet either?!
mircea_popescu: so that someone could go hang.
asciilifeform: in my extensive practice as an absolute nobody -- i also did not. but supposed that someone -- could.
mircea_popescu: in my extensive practice as a major economic agent i never either wanted to or did bother to verify one.
a111: Logged on 2017-01-27 19:10 asciilifeform: there are historical signatures floating about, and one might wish to verify them
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-27#1608249 << i honestly don't see the problem with taking out the bitcoin signature idiocy. ☝︎
ben_vulpes: "address-generation from mining" literally does not compute for me unless there's some amount of "pubkey hash must meet this criteria" a la bitcoin
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it is impractical to make as drawn here.
ben_vulpes: in addition to "mine for subsidy"?
ben_vulpes: is there some amount of "mine for privkey" involved?
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: 'planet x, provably mine, now belongs to ben_vulpes ', signed, asciilifeform
ben_vulpes: i never successfully worked through how transacting would work
ben_vulpes: this one also continues to boggle me: http://btcbase.org/log/2016-03-05#1422790 ☝︎
mircea_popescu: nevertheless, once the headcount crosses millions into billiosn, well... forgetaboutit.
mircea_popescu: yes, property is functionally as well as fundamentally "this is mine which means it's not yours nor yours nor yours nor - i see you there hiding in the back, yours either!"
mircea_popescu: still, none of this solves the fundamental problem, which is : as more and more people get involved, the cost of reporting each transaction to everyone else balloons.
a111: Logged on 2016-08-31 18:02 mircea_popescu: until the coinbase halves, you can only use 50 btc ; then 25 and 12.5 etc.
asciilifeform: but i can't seem to turn it up
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: we had a thread a while back re 'fragless' coins
asciilifeform: aah like the electroluminescent shirts.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform nah, all the ones i've seen use normal 1.5v watch battery.
mircea_popescu: it's actually pretty cool ; can't possibly miss even in the dark. also cunt looks good in it.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform did i tell you about the led crotchless "underwear" ?
asciilifeform: happened, for good or ill, with cpu cycles ('why the fuck there is a computer in my flashlight' thread), plastics, LED, etc.
mircea_popescu: davout the thing that SHOULD be done about it is make it work in such a way it doesn't choke in its own fumes. not that i know how to do that. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: i tried this ; it doth not work irl.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform this is like thinking if universities stopped stupidifying girls tomorrow you'd get good service at the diner.
asciilifeform: consider the discovery of electrolytic aluminum refining.
davout: mircea_popescu: i can see that too, not much that can be done though
asciilifeform: if alchemy tomorrow -- would all get plated in au.
davout: and whenever i do i manage to glue it to sane txen in order for it not to be dust anymore
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: not really oversupplied, there are quite a few unplated contacts in use.
mircea_popescu: davout the problem discussed is where the most serene republic spans 85 million stars and a trillion planets and everyone involved holds a few satoshi and ten thousand times more slaves.
davout: and in this regard, doing-by-hand certainly has value, in the sense that i don't end up with dust
davout: i make pretty much all of my txes by hand and fragmentation is something i try to avoid as much as possibru
asciilifeform: (incidentally, though unanswerable, would be interestig to learn what the purely industrial worth of gold would be.)
mircea_popescu: davout not really a problem of tools.
asciilifeform: going strictly on industrial gold for this example
davout: seems to me like defragging could be a thing given the correct tools
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform gold is worthless for the exact reason goldbugs/idiots think it better than bitcoin. no scaling, because anchored to irrelevancy
asciilifeform: but notice, folx do collect the gold. it is +ev.
mircea_popescu: it still doesn't solve it thought
asciilifeform: in same respect, it would likely cost quite a bit to collect gold contacts from every old cpu in every junkyard.
mircea_popescu: anyway, the issue of fees hopefully limits the smallest practical unit to maybe 1k or so, which blessfully shaves 3 zeros from the problem, and at the right end
mircea_popescu: note that the per-block value is liable to stay ~constant ; it certainly varies less than the price of bitcoin for instance. so those satoshi will always be worth a lot in fiat terms anyway
mircea_popescu: but this one ... well, the numbers actually don't work.
mircea_popescu: this is the only part of the system that's truly badly designed. the node/miner thing, meh, that's iffy.
asciilifeform: so at max fragocalypse, one might have situation where to move 100 satoshi, occupies a block
mircea_popescu: so yes, if we aim to go from "all coinbases = 1 satoshi" through merger to "all coinbases = 2 satoshi" we're looking at a whole shitload of blocks.
mircea_popescu: depends on factors and things but as degree of magnitude it's there.
mircea_popescu: did i misunderstand teh q ?
mircea_popescu: anyway. war in this sense, as in napoleon invading, is a loss of information. ie, library burning.
asciilifeform: incidentally what does a tx to consolidate N addrs having 1 satoshi each, weigh, in terms of N
mircea_popescu: yes, but as they progress so does the bitcoin fragment.
mircea_popescu: tell you what, to the stupid cunts getting pregnant at 13 and failing to learn how to wash or twerk by 16, the little details of their dirty interiors are relevant.
mircea_popescu: this is the definition of racism.
mircea_popescu: of "value" in a very novel, post-bitcoin, deeply information-theoretic interpretation of the term.
mircea_popescu: from the pov of the network, glueing together is technically speaking a loss.
mircea_popescu: kinda what bitcoin doesn't want though.
asciilifeform: then comes hitler and glues all back together,
mircea_popescu: three generations later, all of saxony is 500 duchies, princely domains etc the size of your yard.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform think of evolution of holy roman empire. currently, block of thousand btc all carry the same meaning, "we belong to holy roman emperor".
asciilifeform: why they cannot be defragged ?
mircea_popescu: as time wears on, more and more tinier and tinier bits of coin carry irreducible meaning, and can't be defragged
asciilifeform: but why in this case is it so, if defrag tx takes up no moar space than the original fragging tx
mircea_popescu: technically speaking sticking people back into their mother's cunts to get two people out of a litter of 12 also costs the same.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform the defragging is an antientalpy movement.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: as i understand it, a defragging tx weighs exactly same as fragging tx , though
mircea_popescu: much like nobody seriously bothers to say "the wavefunction that is office chair"
mircea_popescu: now this ontological preoccupation is of no great practical importance, which is why people don't generally gas past "hey it's an uxto"
mircea_popescu: all coins, in the sense of agglomerations of satoshi, exist as descendents of an original block subsidy, and in that sense ARE coinbases ; much like electrons or photons are wave functions. they manifest verifiably in certain points, as "unspent transaction outputs" ; muych like waveform collapses. they interact with matter, in certain ways,this is called a transaction.
ben_vulpes: i am under the impression that a coinbase would not need to be injected, but that the individual utxos do need to be.
a111: Logged on 2017-01-27 19:00 davout: thestringpuller: UTXO set is ~2gb tops, indexing might be nice but necessary to scan for UTXOs that match a given set of addresses, also the wallet part can cache them if that particular wallet is the only one able to actually spend those UTXIs
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-27#1608204 << this brings back an ancient discussion re the most likely failure mode of bitcoin. technically speaking there's 2.1 quadrillion coins which may in principle move independently, worth ~100 bytes each. ☝︎
ben_vulpes: let us sweep the floor then, and settle the semantics. "unspent transaction out" is now "coinbase" according to mircea_popescu ?
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes all coins are the same thing.
ben_vulpes: "coinbases" in this post means something rather different from what i've come to know them as eg the block subsidy
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes recall the cut article ?
ben_vulpes: wait no i don't, why is tx-gen box to be offlined and not the signing box?
asciilifeform: btw i found toslink modules for ~35 cents ea.
asciilifeform: with which to tcp
asciilifeform: not to mention asking it to have a nic
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: requiring faraday cage microcontroller tx gen box to speak whole bitcoin protocol, is imho nuttery
asciilifeform: in point of fact if trb knew how to eat raw tx, you have the knob, neh?
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform yes but there's no clean way currently for me to replace old-wallet with davout-wallet. so in that sense, modularize the wallet out of the code.
a111: Logged on 2017-01-27 18:51 asciilifeform: it'd be one thing if davout proposed the cut ~in tandem with~ a standalone walletron. even if it were made entirely out of the old one.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-01-27#1608165 << it's the right process. if you aim to cut function out, first separate it, then produce replacement. modularize, as it were. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: bitch, you're nobody's wife and there's a reason for that.
mircea_popescu: this #1 disease of the failed female, "if i were your wife i'd poison your coffee."