log☇︎
218600+ entries in 0.064s
mircea_popescu: incidentally, the people here are really fucking derpy, for many reasons. one of which - all the clubs where kids go are like 100sq ft. literally.
mircea_popescu: srsly.
mircea_popescu: http://traackr.com/ dude all these web 2.1 bullshits, where you can't even establish wtf they're supposedly doing AT ALL. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: ;;later tell mthreat https://laalameda.wordpress.com/tag/prostibulo/ << check out the drama surrounding that derpy bar in recoletta.
mircea_popescu: :p
mircea_popescu: where n is the cost of just writing it
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes the cost of properly stealing his code would be i guess log n
mircea_popescu: seems the sort of meta-prograsmming task for which lisp was invented anyway. keep your code as a s-expr of the code you deliver. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: then as a licensee you DONT know what you need to transform to wipe the watermark, so you have to transform... "everything". which results in a turd, which as he says, who the fuck will want that.
mircea_popescu: on it goes.
mircea_popescu: bit 2 : name of function x
mircea_popescu: bit 1 : presence or absence of space after dot at position x y
mircea_popescu: yes.
mircea_popescu: and then just make a hash and interpret it as bitflips over that list
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes he would maintain a list of places where he can change things
mircea_popescu: entries like "add blank space after dots in following positions" or etc
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes he would just build a list of things to change and change them all.
mircea_popescu: yeah, the result is not worthless. << i mean, the result of this convo, re code watermarking, even if notperfect is still not worthless.
mircea_popescu: yeah, the result is not worthless.
mircea_popescu: this is a drastically degraded version ofthe code tho, i readily grant
mircea_popescu: (comments count as spaces)
mircea_popescu: all names hashed, all spaces removed, etc.
mircea_popescu: by transforming everything that's not required by the machine.
mircea_popescu: but code being by its nature code, i have a firm guarantee that i can wipe your watermark out.
mircea_popescu: i can see the 32 bit hash names.
mircea_popescu: before i leak it i just hash all entity names with a "fuck gabby" salt
mircea_popescu: you woukdn't tho.
mircea_popescu: which may be more work than they're willing to put into it, but still, would kill your drm like it kills that stupid "sound security" thing we discussed a coupla weeksa ago
mircea_popescu: course, they could just edit the names to some random hash of their own.
mircea_popescu: who knew.
mircea_popescu: ya you CAN actually watermark code.
mircea_popescu: wow.
mircea_popescu: hm.
mircea_popescu: then just alter the salt.
mircea_popescu: of course you could use a "32 char hash" convention for all your entities
mircea_popescu: but this is too fucking laborious.
mircea_popescu: name a class HerpyClass in one version and Herpy_Class in another
mircea_popescu: (i suppose you could, if you were very devious
mircea_popescu: traditionally this is solved with watermarking, but that only works on idiots and catpictures. you can't watermark code.
mircea_popescu: and from D it goes to E and soon enough it's free, at which point everyone loses the -ev counter-incentive.
mircea_popescu: and you can't find out, because they all deny.
mircea_popescu: except if D proposes to get it for half price and not tell you, they are now +ev
mircea_popescu: the problem you have, however, is one of externalities. say A, B and C are your customers, and yes for them giving your stuff away is -ev if you know about it.
mircea_popescu: on the oher hand, i guess i also would never starve.
mircea_popescu: but it isn't actually enough for to pay for me to be doing it.
mircea_popescu: this is also a point. amusingly enough, trilema makes more money than the mean of web properties, notwithstanding the fact that it's enforced very laxily.
mircea_popescu: not persuaded taking that away is enough to fix drm tho
mircea_popescu: interesting point this. yes the drm crowd wants contradictory things
mircea_popescu: eventually you end up causing > 1k worth of damage to idiot party on top of everything
mircea_popescu: aquired by further fool, idem...
mircea_popescu: they pay for a year or five eventually go bankrupt
mircea_popescu: i think this is the best thing to do - get a domain, have some lulz, let it drop, idiot "vultures" registe rit because WOW WAS USED!11 is VALUABLE!!1
mircea_popescu: i'd pay to be hidden from them.
mircea_popescu: cazalla think about it. the typeins are by definition idiots.
mircea_popescu: cripplefight/bitchfest as to what "should be" ensues.
mircea_popescu: cazalla so tl;dr : ver scammed okcoin into paying for a domain name, which is as we all know NEVER worth any money. okcoin got out of original depry phase after 3 months through eithry smarting up or running out of cash.
mircea_popescu: <mats> how is it possible this has escaped audit all this time << welcome to the wunderbar world of FOSS, aka a chunk of raw meat in the sun, festering with a million grub eyes
mircea_popescu: <mats> i'm not caught up on logs but someone else noticed this right << not publicly.
mircea_popescu: cazalla such lolcows these ppls.
mircea_popescu: trinque meanwhile he died!
mircea_popescu: who ?
mircea_popescu: aha
mircea_popescu: not some derpy woman's concotion
mircea_popescu: pete_dushenski "The Secret Life of Salvador Dalí" in english
mircea_popescu: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=4 << and a very young alf.
mircea_popescu: not every dislike is a phobia. to say nothing of "insufficiently enthused tolerance"
mircea_popescu: then all software will be bitcoin gems.
mircea_popescu: orly.
mircea_popescu: "clearly, you breahed the contract" "did not" < unresolvable dispute
mircea_popescu: and once a third party has it, what do you do ?
mircea_popescu: Adlai yes
mircea_popescu: abject begging. sort-of like what englishman venturng in asia would see.
mircea_popescu: https://8ch.net/btc/index.html << i suspec this is representative of what we'll be seeing in future in any btc-for-general-public venue.
mircea_popescu: i don't get how it'd work.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes and how do you distinguish who squelched ?
mircea_popescu: seeing how it wouldn't trigger unless we find two
mircea_popescu: if anyone feels like downloading phuctor's P and trying all these types of divisors on it see if we already contain one
mircea_popescu: hanbot yeah actually, not bad heuristic.
mircea_popescu: funkenstein_ the what now ?
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla verily.
mircea_popescu: and some keys are made of modules with two central symmetry factors, whereas some other keys only include one
mircea_popescu: then there's central symmetry like in 7.1 or 4.2, but there's also simple repeating like in 4.1
mircea_popescu: let's try and count the types. first, there's two types with key 4.2. type T1.1 like 4.x and 10.x, which include a central symmetry factor 2nd key ; type T1.2 like 6.x and 9.x which does not
mircea_popescu: key 10.2 : 12884901891 = 1100000000000000000000000000000011
mircea_popescu: key 10.1 : 4294967297 = like key 4.2.
mircea_popescu: key 9.2 : absent
mircea_popescu: key 9.1 : like key 4.2.
mircea_popescu: key 8.2 : 21474836485 = 10100000000000000000000000000000101
mircea_popescu: key 8.1 : 12884901891 = 1100000000000000000000000000000011
mircea_popescu: key 7.2 : 30064771079 = 11100000000000000000000000000000111
mircea_popescu: key 7.1 : 98784247831 = 1011100000000000000000000000000010111
mircea_popescu: key 6.1 : absent
mircea_popescu: key 6.1 : like key 4.2.
mircea_popescu: key 5.2 : 270582939711 = 111111 00000000000000000000000000 111111
mircea_popescu: key 5.1 : 7301444404 = 1101100 11001100 11001100 1100110100
mircea_popescu: key 4.2 : 4294967297 = 100000000000000000000000000000001
mircea_popescu: key 4.1 : 17742509903907 = 1000000100011 0000000000000000000 1000000100011
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform check it out, all the nontrivial factors found have very interesting binary symmetries.
mircea_popescu: lulzy
mircea_popescu: seriously, you "can't spy on military" because magic ? srsly, "time is his for the asking" for being FAMOUS ? gtfo.