asciilifeform: ag3nt_zer0: it wasn't especially viable then. and after adoption as official usg policy in a mildly perverted form, i can't think of who might voluntarily work with such a thing today
asciilifeform: one, or none, of those keys - may turn up.
asciilifeform: decimation: thing is, nothing can ever be proven 'lost forever'
asciilifeform: ag3nt_zer0: the paper referenced in the article, however, has nothing to do with me
asciilifeform: one might suppose that its existence is 'priced into the market' somehow.
asciilifeform: this bomb is there, whether anyone wants to talk about it or not, and may - or may not - explode one day
asciilifeform: ag3nt_zer0: the 'atomic bomb' is - now, as when i wrote the piece- -- the mega-holdings under a sole key, which never move.
asciilifeform: ag3nt_zer0: hard to argue that ~coins that never move~ are 'e-wallets behind one address'
asciilifeform: decimation: this is doubly lulzy because amex is the 'pay to play' cc issuer
asciilifeform: why this was - i can't recall. might like to ask him.
asciilifeform: ag3nt_zer0: i don't recall mircea_popescu ever devoting a whole article to specifically that one. his position, iirc, is 'satoshi lost the keys'☟︎
asciilifeform: i can't think of a reason to suspect that this was ever public, but doesn't hurt to look.