asciilifeform: this keeps in perfect fitting with the 'computing industry'-as-a-protection racket business model of the last 20+ yrs, where it 'solves' exclusively those problems which it, itself, creates.☟︎☟︎
asciilifeform: the other is the entirely sane hunger of pretty much everyone with half a brain to escape from winblowz, or, failing that, at least not have his private keys touched by winblowz.
asciilifeform: one is the microshit/palladium/fritzchip/treacherous computing (see rms essay by same name) totalitarian batshit
asciilifeform: there are at least two independent political pressures for the 'trusted' separate cpu-in-a-cpu thingies
asciilifeform: but i suppose this is when i say a bit about WHY we have these idiocies.
asciilifeform: (deprive it of firmware, switch it off.)
asciilifeform: this is not untrue, but there is a key difference - FOR FUCKS SAKE AMD DOESN'T FORCE IT TO BE ON !
asciilifeform: 'But is the situation much different on AMD-based x86 platforms? It doesnt seem so! The problems related to boot security seem to be similar to those we discussed in this paper. And it seems AMD has an equivalent of Intel ME also, just disguised as Platform Security Processor (PSP)'
asciilifeform: there is literally 1 paragraph devoted to amd:☟︎
asciilifeform: and gotta love the crock of shit where x86 == intel
asciilifeform: otherwise the fw is rsa-signed (2048b iirc)
asciilifeform: (to prevent you from cutting it out of the bios image)
asciilifeform: punkman: phun phakt: intel's recent (few yrs) cpus have a countdown which cuts power in 30 min. if the me firmware doesn't execute
asciilifeform: dell's 'chromebook 11'. but keep in mind 1) it requires heavy-duty massage to transform into something like a civilized pc and 2) 'mil-std' is not 'stops rifle bullet' but simply means it passed some degree of traditional vibration, dust, water tortures.
asciilifeform: speaking only of the particular pet, it is innocent of makeup, and has purse solely because pockets are not consistently implemented in woman's clothing
asciilifeform: i won't spoil it, will let folks drop their jaws when they look up precisely what.
asciilifeform: ;;later tell mircea_popescu http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=25-10-2015#1308259 << pet sayeth: 'how does mircea_popescu square his masked-superhero-for-fungibility theory with the fact that the actors appear maskless for long stretches of any one of these films ?'☝︎
asciilifeform: i can already picture the reaction folks will have to my sha512 that takes 10,001 times longer than the customary one
asciilifeform: anyway it is inevitable that there will be multiple generations of this. it is a very thick mental cock that folks will have to slowly and methodically dilate for before it can fully park.
asciilifeform: my understanding was that mircea_popescu is asking for a virtual version of something that could later be siliconized.
asciilifeform: simply that we're encoding constants as ternaries ?